Quote:
Originally Posted by mistercorporate
We can still maintain much of our administrative structure where it's needed most. Maintain Ottawa-Gatineau as an administrative capital, no need to move too many jobs around, but the symbolism of having Winnipeg as an official capital with primarily legislative functions is what I'm speaking of. For practical purposes, the Central corridor is where the bulk of our governance responsibilities are so the big organizations will be based there. If our legislative branched is executed or captured during war our bureaucracy (primarily military bureaucracy) is the most important wing anyway. Realistically much of that will be in the Algonquin Highlands of Ontario, the forests and military bases near Quebec City and the Northern Prairies.
|
Why would we move the legislative functions but not he bureaucrats? That would just complicate the whole thing.
Seems to me Ottawa was, is and always will be the best choice as the capital.
If we're talking symbolism, the city is situated right on the border of French and English Canada. It has also been a symbolic place for the aboriginals (granted, Winnipeg is also something of a melting pot for French, English and Indigenous, but arguably not as much as the Ottawa region).
Talking economics, demographics and history, we are a short distance from half the population of the country with the financial capital (Toronto), the historic heart (Québec City) and former cultural and economic capital (Montréal). It is also arguably easier to defend with more military bases nearby.
The biggest blow to Winnipeg, I think, is that it is too isolated to take on the roles and responsibilities of a capital city.