HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2017, 7:15 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by osmo View Post
MLB in Montreal is viable as not many other options left for markets in the USA
Charlotte, Portland, Nashville....

Mexico City is a pipedream for a number of reasons (altitude being one) but Monterey makes sense on a number of different levels. Montreal is probably at the top of the list but all applicants need owners and stadiums. Vancouver gets thrown around some but stadium would be a giant hurdle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueandgoldguy View Post
I don't think you can build a "no-frills" MLB stadium with 35,000 seats for $200 million. That $200 million stadium proposed for Montreal in the late 90s would probably be $500 million today...maybe even slightly more.
Absolutely.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2017, 4:03 AM
osmo osmo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,717
I don't understand why the Texas Rangers can't renovate the stadium and install larger awnings to cover the seats?

Maybe people don't go to games because the Rangers have been up and down and inconsistent for the past 20 years. Maybe also because the ballpark is in a suburban bog that makes sense for ten football games a year but is a stretch for 80 games?

Arlington Ballpark is a gem. A quirky suburban model that was a retro style response to Skydome which attempted to copy the same "mixed-use" elements by incorporating an office building into the ballpark.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2017, 4:23 AM
Berklon's Avatar
Berklon Berklon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by osmo View Post
I don't understand why the Texas Rangers can't renovate the stadium and install larger awnings to cover the seats?
The awnings would protect the fans from the sun and the extra heat it gives off, but I'd imagine it's still too hot even in the shade in Texas. It's not going to compete with a roof and air conditioning. Phoenix opened their baseball stadium just 4 years later, and they were smart enough to build it with a retractable roof.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2017, 6:55 PM
cjones2451's Avatar
cjones2451 cjones2451 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Port Moody, BC
Posts: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berklon View Post
The awnings would protect the fans from the sun and the extra heat it gives off, but I'd imagine it's still too hot even in the shade in Texas. It's not going to compete with a roof and air conditioning. Phoenix opened their baseball stadium just 4 years later, and they were smart enough to build it with a retractable roof.
Houston has the same thing with Minute Maid Park....Same with Miami too. But getting a new stadium after 20 years seems so Atlanta
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2017, 4:17 AM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,520
The rangers have ODOR so they suck. As for the stadium maybe structurally they can't add awnings? It's a decent venue otherwise.
__________________
"Less is more" – Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2017, 11:32 PM
blueandgoldguy blueandgoldguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,847
Ohhhhh. Snap Edmonton!

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...ena-1.4313740?

"One of the reasons Calgary is in this situation right now is because so many other cities have so weakly capitulated when Bettman and their billionaire buddies have made the exact same threats," said National Post columnist Jen Gerson.

"Edmonton is the clear example of this. I mean, clearly, so much of Edmonton's flagging, sad, little ego is tied up in their hockey success that they needed to sign a scam of a deal to give a sweetheart arena over to (Oilers owner) Daryl Katz. And now all of a sudden the expectation is that Calgary is going to fall in line?"

"I'm afraid we're not that pathetic," she said. "We're just not that pathetic, as a city."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 1:55 PM
Jaws Jaws is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueandgoldguy View Post
Ohhhhh. Snap Edmonton!

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...ena-1.4313740?

"One of the reasons Calgary is in this situation right now is because so many other cities have so weakly capitulated when Bettman and their billionaire buddies have made the exact same threats," said National Post columnist Jen Gerson.

"Edmonton is the clear example of this. I mean, clearly, so much of Edmonton's flagging, sad, little ego is tied up in their hockey success that they needed to sign a scam of a deal to give a sweetheart arena over to (Oilers owner) Daryl Katz. And now all of a sudden the expectation is that Calgary is going to fall in line?"

"I'm afraid we're not that pathetic," she said. "We're just not that pathetic, as a city."

Blah, blah, blah. Sounds like someone is jealous. How can it be that Edmonton can have something that they don’t have?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 2:41 PM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaws View Post
Blah, blah, blah. Sounds like someone is jealous. How can it be that Edmonton can have something that they don’t have?
Well they have The West Edmonton Mall and I am quite happy with that being a three hour drive north of me.
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 2:49 PM
BlackRedGold BlackRedGold is offline
Progressive Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ottawa / Elsewhere
Posts: 797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaws View Post
Blah, blah, blah. Sounds like someone is jealous. How can it be that Edmonton can have something that they don’t have?
Clearly they don't want what Edmonton has - an NHL rink financed primarily off the backs of taxpayers - so why are they jealous?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 8:21 PM
Jaws Jaws is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackRedGold View Post
Clearly they don't want what Edmonton has - an NHL rink financed primarily off the backs of taxpayers - so why are they jealous?
Time to do some research before spouting off. This is being funded by a CRL, ticket tax and the Oilers. The city borrowed the money and the aforementioned revenue sources are paying off the loan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 8:51 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
They didn't pay for the arena with magic beans, they money came from somewhere. Yes it was financed in large part by taxpayers
__________________
Short term pain for long term gain
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 9:10 PM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaws View Post
Time to do some research before spouting off. This is being funded by a CRL, ticket tax and the Oilers. The city borrowed the money and the aforementioned revenue sources are paying off the loan.
The Oilers only put up $20 million, the rest of the monies the Oilers agreed to pay was funded up front by the CoE.. And the CRL monies, if no arena then where could've those monies been used?
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 10:03 PM
BlackRedGold BlackRedGold is offline
Progressive Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ottawa / Elsewhere
Posts: 797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaws View Post
Time to do some research before spouting off. This is being funded by a CRL, ticket tax and the Oilers. The city borrowed the money and the aforementioned revenue sources are paying off the loan.
I'm going to guess you're from Edmonton, the land where the Oilers can do no wrong even when they're drafting first year after year. I'm going to guess Katz didn't flirt with Seattle to pay for everything himself.

According to Wikipedia (and please correct me if Wikipedia is wrong), here's where the money is coming from:

$279 million from the Community Revitalization Levy (CRL) and other incremental revenues (increased parking revenue, reallocation of existing subsidy paid to Northlands and new taxes from business in the arena)
$125 million from ticket surcharge on all events in the new arena
$137.81 million from lease revenue for the Arena
$23.68 million in cash from Edmonton Arena Corporation
$25 million from other government sources


The $279M is money from the city. The CRL is property tax revenue and the other things are all money from the city. This is almost 50% of the cost.

The $125M is presumably a loan from the city being paid back by the Oilers and whoever else is running events at the arena.

$137.81M is presumably a loan the city is giving out that is being paid back by the Oilers. But with the city owning the building, what is the property tax on it?

$23.68M is how much Katz directly put into the arena.

$25M is more taxpayer money spent on the arena.

So tell me again who is financing the arena?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 4:11 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
Jen Gerson a pseudonym for Trump? Why be so divisive with belittling Edmonton? They're not the Calgary Flames organization.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 4:32 PM
wave46 wave46 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Jen Gerson a pseudonym for Trump? Why be so divisive with belittling Edmonton? They're not the Calgary Flames organization.
Calgary-Edmonton sibling rivalry showing a bit there?

After reading the piece, it's basically the opinion of 3 analysts - it's a non-news item. There's no new information here, just 3 people giving their opinion.

We've covered this pretty extensively already in this thread.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2017, 10:03 PM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
A CRL could've been used in many ways besides an arena, that's all I'm saying. Katz was the real winner here in only having to fork out $20 million of his own money, pocket change for him.
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2017, 12:06 AM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
It doesn't really matter where the CoE got the monies, the simple fact remains s that the CoE has taken over 95% of the initial financial risk that will decrease over time. CSEC would most likely love to have a similar deal I'm Calgary but right now it appears very few in Calgary are willing to bankroll a similar project to such an extent with debt that will be carried by the CoC..

But the CoE had three wonderful facilities in the new arena, Commonwealth Stadium and the Butterdome of which the CoC has nothing that can even remotely compete on the same level. I do not believe that the CoE has bled their finance well dry to get this arena deal done or at least I hope they haven't.

Never the less, some of these things should probably be built sooner than later in the CoC - just not sure how we'll get there in the CoC..
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2017, 3:21 AM
itom 987's Avatar
itom 987 itom 987 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,083
240glt, I would totally agree with you if the deal consisted of only the arena itself. But the fact that Katz has helped build Stantec Tower, JW Marriott hotel, City of Edmonton tower and the Ice District means he has been living up to his side of the deal. Will the deal make Katz a lot of money? It looks like it, but Katz has taken on lot of risk as well. Lets be honest here, most developers don't have the guts do what Katz is doing in a place like Edmonton.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2017, 7:26 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by itom 987 View Post
240glt, I would totally agree with you if the deal consisted of only the arena itself. But the fact that Katz has helped build Stantec Tower, JW Marriott hotel, City of Edmonton tower and the Ice District means he has been living up to his side of the deal. Will the deal make Katz a lot of money? It looks like it, but Katz has taken on lot of risk as well. Lets be honest here, most developers don't have the guts do what Katz is doing in a place like Edmonton.
You're confusing guts with political connections. Others developers would have stepped up their game too if handed such a sweetheart deal. Stantec was going to sign a lease downtown and they were looking for new. The CofE was staying downtown too. You would still have office construction even if Katz didn't have his competitive advantage to win these RFPs.

Great photo. Exemplifies how internally focused the design of the ICE District blocks are. That's one a cold, bland streetscape.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2017, 6:35 AM
itom 987's Avatar
itom 987 itom 987 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
You're confusing guts with political connections. Others developers would have stepped up their game too if handed such a sweetheart deal. Stantec was going to sign a lease downtown and they were looking for new. The CofE was staying downtown too. You would still have office construction even if Katz didn't have his competitive advantage to win these RFPs.

Great photo. Exemplifies how internally focused the design of the ICE District blocks are. That's one a cold, bland streetscape.
Your comment above shows a complete lack of understanding of what was available at the time.

I am aware that there were something like 7 proposals that showed up when the City of Edmonton tower RFP was announced. One of them was to convert a company owned park on Jasper Avenue into a tower. Another wanted to demolish an old movie theatre, another one wanted to fill a small parking lot, yet another one wanted to build a 'flatiron' style skyscraper in the quarters. Another developer wanted to build a tower just east or Epcor Tower, another wanted to replace a park in front of the Hotel McDonald into a tower,. Another proposal was to build on an already existing podium (Manulife Place 2). I am very sure that all those proposals would have gave Stantec the opportunity as well.

Yes, those proposals would have happened if Katz never purchased the Oilers. We would have been left with a little change here and a little change there but nothing truly transformative. The buildings built would not have been as iconic as what is being built in the Ice District. If chosen, Manulife Place 2 would have been the tallest of them all at 600 feet.

Katz purchased two entirely undeveloped blocks, the Staples site and many other sites around Rogers Place. No other developer offered so much change to the largest hole in downtown's urban fabric. The towers proposed were all significantly larger than the ones proposed by other developers. The residences on the top half of Stantec Tower, I believe that is solely Katz doing, and I bet the same goes for the residences on top of the JW Marriott hotel. Wow, talk about bold moves... As for City of Edmonton tower, it was on the closest site to City Hall so the choice for them was obvious.

I'll take that cold bland streetscape over the black hole that was there before any day. Oh; bye the way, did you know that a restaurant called "Joey Bell Tower" was built beside the podium of Bell Tower on the opposite side of the City of Edmonton tower in that photo that Katz has nothing to do with? I'm sure you heard of it before but didn't remember, your welcome!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.