HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #381  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2024, 5:10 PM
MarkR MarkR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by shelltime View Post
No parking in the burbs is never going to happen, you wouldn't be able to market a project. Downtown, way less parking is being built compared to 10 years ago and seems to be going in the right direction... Jeff is just pandering to the anti car crowd.

the culture war around cars aside, our transit sucks. Fix that and maybe Ottawans won't drive.

Regarding parking - live in Centretown and try and have someone coming by car visit during the day. The hourly parking limit is all over the place. For instance, Bay St. is 3 hours, Percy and James are 2, but Gilmour and Florence are only 1. No rhyme or reason to it that I can see...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #382  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2024, 7:55 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by SL123 View Post
And the Mayor and his minions LOVE to reject these grants claiming the buildings will likely be built anyway (for example, the airport hotel that is now u/c without the grant, but scaled down). Ironically, many of these projects that were approved today are actually already u/c.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #383  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2024, 12:53 AM
CastlesintheSky CastlesintheSky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by SL123 View Post
Brownfield Grant Application Approved

https://pub-ottawa.escribemeetings.c...ab=attachments
This might be a very stupid question, but why have they approved a grant for a building that is halfway through construction? Obviously the developers proceeded without the grant money secured... so isn't is just throwing money at a development that was already going to happen anyways?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #384  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2024, 1:10 AM
SL123 SL123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by CastlesintheSky View Post
This might be a very stupid question, but why have they approved a grant for a building that is halfway through construction? Obviously the developers proceeded without the grant money secured... so isn't is just throwing money at a development that was already going to happen anyways?
I read that councillors approved a couple of brownfield grants on the grounds that the proposals were submitted under the old rules and before they paused the program.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #385  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2024, 1:52 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by CastlesintheSky View Post
This might be a very stupid question, but why have they approved a grant for a building that is halfway through construction? Obviously the developers proceeded without the grant money secured... so isn't is just throwing money at a development that was already going to happen anyways?
Yeah, I know. The big argument is always "why approve the grant if this will get built anyway?". I think the real argument is "do they contribute to my election campaign"? Mark Motors must have. The airport and Groupe Germain probably did not. At least one of the ones that got approved must have, but they couldn't approve one but reject the others.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #386  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2024, 1:49 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,553
A sudden end to the tax break controversy you never heard about
Councillors reach compromise on incentives for developers who build on contaminated land

Elyse Skura · CBC News
Posted: Apr 27, 2024 4:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: 6 hours ago


Ottawa's mayor has given up on a campaign promise to axe a contentious tax break for developers.

Mayor Mark Sutcliffe's platform confidently foresaw the end of the brownfields grant, which provides financial incentives for developers to clean up and build on contaminated land, claiming the move would "protect revenue the city has given up."

But persuading councillors proved too difficult.

"I'm not a fan of these kinds of programs, but I also have to work with my council colleagues and achieve consensus," Sutcliffe said. "I think we found a place that we could all live with."

He told CBC the process to find that place was long and "tricky," alluding to protracted political debates that have at times threatened to turn as toxic as the former city dumps and abandoned gas stations staff hope to see rehabilitated.

Yet at some point in the past few months, behind-the-scenes negotiations persuaded even the staunchest among the program's critics to see the latest changes as a win.

Sutcliffe also stressed that his campaign pledge should be viewed as an intention to review the program rather than to cancel it, saying "at the very least I wanted to see that the focus would be tightened around our priorities."

Ottawa views itself as a pioneer in this sort of incentive program.

From 2007 until this council paused the program in 2022, the city approved 69 applications with a combined value of $161 million.

But developers don't receive a one-time windfall. Money is doled out over time from the portion of property taxes they pay to the city, over and above what it collected before the lot's value jumped.

<lots more>

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...bout-1.7186267
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #387  
Old Posted May 15, 2024, 4:27 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,553
Proposed rooming house discord near Algonquin College a sign of things to come
City says projects fill vital need, neighbours warn of garbage pileup and parking nightmare

Arthur White-Crummey · CBC News
Posted: May 15, 2024 12:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: May 15




A rooming house proposed near Algonquin College in Ottawa brought angry neighbours to an obscure city committee meeting on Tuesday, as early ripples from a planning sea change begin to make themselves felt.

The developer behind the two-storey project at 2335 Baseline Rd., came to Panel 2 of the city's committee of adjustment asking to increase the number of permitted rooms from seven to 12. He also asked for just one parking space, instead of the three that would otherwise be required.

Erin O'Connell, a senior planner with the city, told the committee the zoning bylaw is "outdated." She said the seven-room number was chosen years ago and is no longer consistent with current policy.

A small group of residents sat through the hours-long meeting in audible frustration — before three came forward to air grievances about how that policy fits with their low-rise community.

Jason Walton worried that perhaps two dozen people might cram into the rooms, which were described as "quite generous" in their dimensions. He said the single parking space is completely inadequate to accommodate such a number.

Mark Craig said he's noticed other rooming houses beginning to "pop up" nearby. He pointed to parties and garbage to argue that they've changed the neighbourhood for the worse.

"We want to keep our neighbourhood the way it is," he said, before addressing the developer. "It's a business for them. These are our homes."

Ted Long said he lives right behind a neighbouring rooming house.

He said the grass is a jungle full of garbage, raccoons and other wildlife. He called it "disgusting" and "unbearable."

"It's destroying neighbourhoods where people are trying to raise their children," said Long. "I don't want to see more of it."

But it seems highly likely that Long will see more of them around Algonquin College and elsewhere. The city's current zoning bylaw would allow a seven-unit rooming house on the site, but it limits them in many other lower density zones.

That will soon change.

The city's top planning document already foresees allowing them on every residential lot across the city, and the draft zoning bylaw now going through public consultation must comply with it. The city confirmed on Tuesday that it contains the same broad permissions.

Jacob Bolduc of Fotenn, the developer's agent, directly cited that policy change to argue for the Baseline Road project. He said rooming houses allow low-income people with few other options, like students, an affordable and flexible place to live.

"They are renting their own room and controlling their own destiny," he said.

Bolduc said rooming houses are consistent with the city's push to allow more housing options, especially along major transit corridors like Baseline Road, which is slated to get a bus-rapid transit line sometime in the indefinite future.

He noted that the province stepped in to force cities to allow triplexes on every residential lot. Each of those could have four bedrooms, so Bolduc asked why a 12-unit rooming house should be treated any differently.

The developer, Jacques Hamel, ran through the proposal in detail. It would mainly use the existing foundation of the bungalow now on the site, though the second floor would hang over into the backyard.

Each room would have a bathroom, and there would be kitchens in the basement and on the first floor. The project would have garbage storage and parking for six bicycles.

"The compact form is in keeping with the character of the neighbourhood," he said.

He called it "human scale" and said it would afford a "high quality of life" for a wide range of residents.

City planning staff said they had no concerns about the application.

In a written statement, the city's program manager of zoning and intensification, Carol Ruddy, said the city recognizes that people who don't form part of a household may rely on non-traditional housing types, such as rooming houses.

But she said there will still be restrictions on rooming houses.

According to the draft zoning bylaw, no single building could have more than one rooming house. In the lowest density zone, a maximum of eight bedrooms would be allowed in a rooming house, though higher density areas could have more.

The draft also intends to completely remove minimum parking rules — like the one that would ordinarily require three parking spots for the Baseline Road project — except in the case of accessible and visitor parking for certain projects.

Bolduc said he understands concerns about how the neighbourhood around the project is changing, but he said the alternative might be an even taller, denser building that the new zoning bylaw will likely allow on a major street like Baseline Road.

He said that would only bring more units and more garbage.

"The foundation of urban planning is managing change," he said. "The purpose of this application is trying to find that happy medium."

The committee of adjustment panel that heard the application reserved its decision, and committed to providing an answer within 10 days.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...come-1.7204363
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #388  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2024, 6:05 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,553
Could pre-fab infill be the key for cities looking to unlock housing funds?
BuildingIN pitches ready-to-build infill projects for mature neighbourhoods

Elyse Skura · CBC News
Posted: Jun 04, 2024 10:22 AM EDT | Last Updated: 2 hours ago




A group of housing experts in Ottawa is pitching a plan to help cities speed up residential construction by creating lowrise homes where infrastructure already exists — a potential solution they say is cheaper than building out in the suburbs, and easier than raising residential towers.

The BuildingIN program is two-fold: It includes a new simulation tool to test the potential impact of infill on neighbourhoods, and a catalogue of pre-fabricated lowrise designs ready to slot into mature areas.

Planners, researchers and community leaders believe that one-two punch will help cities reach construction targets that are now far out of reach.

"We need new approaches to housing that get us from where we are now to a really dramatic increase in supply," said Rosaline Hill, the architect, planner and development consultant who's leading the program.

"We're not looking for fine tuning or minor improvements. We need a really significant change."

Cities including Ottawa have looked to the federal and provincial governments for help to address the housing crisis, but securing funding means meeting targets that are sometimes more "aspirational" than grounded in fact.

Former Ottawa city councillor Catherine McKenney's national non-profit group CitySHAPES is part of the coalition of experts backing the project. They hope it can help alleviate financial pressures facing municipalities struggling to pay for infrastructure in new housing developments.

"Cities are strapped for cash. I can attest to that," McKenney said at the official launch of BuildingIN on Monday. "Continuing to pay to service new neighbourhoods farther and farther away from their core is just simply not sustainable."

The federal government attempted to make infill projects easier by including automatic approvals for four residential units on a single lot, a requirement for receiving housing accelerator funding.

BuildingIN takes that one step further, with permit-ready projects of up to nine units.

Cities that sign up for the program would be able to customize their catalogue of pre-fabricated lowrise building designs with what works for them, and use the simulator program to plan out where growth makes sense.



The program has already drawn the attention of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, which has so far awarded it $1 million in seed money.

Now a semi-finalist in the Housing Supply Challenge, BuildingIN stands to receive millions more if it breaks either the top 10 or the top three.

For now, it's focused on getting cities to sign on.

Its pitch to these potential clients is simple: pay for a program that will help speed up new housing projects, and reach the growth targets you need to unlock substantial federal and provincial funding.

"We've got a lot of willing municipalities that are very, very interested in, how can we actually get to our target?" said Steve Pomeroy, a housing policy researcher. "I think the timing is just right."

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...unds-1.7223382
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:08 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.