HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2024, 5:19 PM
idunno idunno is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 937
Stations are looking great. Matching the standardization but also quality of the Evergreen Line. Build this thing!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2024, 7:16 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
The stations on the Broadway extension each have an individual contrasting colour.
I never noticed that in the design but the colour inspiration for the Broadway Subway seem to be better integrated into the station design as accent colours on entry ceiling etc. And they are pretty generic as "colours" metallic grey, reflective gold, green, dark copper...

This is just tacky. I'd honestly be more satisfied by a Douglas Coupland metal tree trunk painted neon green on the top of the station house.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2024, 8:27 PM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
This is just tacky. I'd honestly be more satisfied by a Douglas Coupland metal tree trunk painted neon green on the top of the station house.
I'm glad I'm not the only one - I specifically commented on it being a 'tacky gimmick' when I filled in the survey this morning.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2024, 10:16 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,491
It's just unfortunate because some stations will be saddled with trendy colours that may not age well.
Fleetwood (called "red", but looks like dusty rose) and Hillcrest (blah beige) seem the worst to me.

Strange how the lime green in the render posted by Jollyburger isn't even on the list.


https://engage.gov.bc.ca/app/uploads/sit...-Set-General-Boards-November2024-WEB.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2024, 11:56 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,054
Piling at 152nd, getting very close to thread title change time. Taken 20 November.


152 Street Piling by B.C. Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2024, 2:13 AM
Stainer Stainer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 57
That's a great shot! I don't remember exactly where I saw it, but it said that the project is now in main construction, which is odd since there hasn't been a ground breaking.. But hey, progress!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2024, 6:18 AM
dharper dharper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Surrey
Posts: 282
It sure looked like they were driving piles at the Langley City Centre Station, when I drove by there a few days ago. I thought it was odd that there was no fanfare that they had started construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2024, 8:40 AM
Bobert Bobert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 249
Stations are all under construction

Road is being widened near the new OMC

Medians are being taken out all along Fraser Highway

And construction is taking place pretty much all day


So yea, i think this is in full construction mode
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2024, 5:08 PM
idunno idunno is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 937
Isn't it nice to have an elevated SkyTrain project where stations can start construction right away, instead of a 2/3 year dig dig dig -> install traffic deck -> wait for TBM to pass through schedule before station construction (other than the box) can begin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2024, 5:59 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by idunno View Post
Isn't it nice to have an elevated SkyTrain project where stations can start construction right away, instead of a 2/3 year dig dig dig -> install traffic deck -> wait for TBM to pass through schedule before station construction (other than the box) can begin.
Don't worry it will still take a painfully long time to finish.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2024, 6:57 PM
GMD GMD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 337
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Don't worry it will still take a painfully long time to finish.
Yes, these projects seem to take forever, but here is something to cheer you up, Seattle comparing 4+ year planning phases for Link projects to 1 1/2 years for the Expo extension to Surrey
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2024, 7:02 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 1,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMD View Post
Yes, these projects seem to take forever, but here is something to cheer you up, Seattle comparing 4+ year planning phases for Link projects to 1 1/2 years for the Expo extension to Surrey
Not really sure that's accurate, the Surrey Rapid Transit Alternatives Analysis process started in 2010 (which did recommend the current Skytrain down Fraser Highway and BRT down King George, but we spent the better part of the 2010s with the LRT boondoggle) and here we are in 2024 barely starting construction on the line (with no construction started on the King George BRT component yet). That's a 14 year timeline from my perspective.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2024, 7:04 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMD View Post
Yes, these projects seem to take forever, but here is something to cheer you up, Seattle comparing 4+ year planning phases for Link projects to 1 1/2 years for the Expo extension to Surrey
I'm actually a big fan of Seattle's Link expansions to date. They approve the route and funding up front, and work out the details over time. They have a long range plan.

Our process is arguably backwards. How long have we been talking about Broadway? How many soil sample projects have been done along the line?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2024, 7:15 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
I'm actually a big fan of Seattle's Link expansions to date. They approve the route and funding up front, and work out the details over time. They have a long range plan.

Our process is arguably backwards. How long have we been talking about Broadway? How many soil sample projects have been done along the line?
On the other hand, doesn't Link have some of the highest construction costs/km in the world? There's definitely a price to be paid when you work under an approve first-ask questions later system.

Personally though, I think Skytrain pretty easily pays for itself due to the implicit economic and social benefits rapid transit provides, so I'm always amenable to fast tracking it, so to speak.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMD View Post
Yes, these projects seem to take forever, but here is something to cheer you up, Seattle comparing 4+ year planning phases for Link projects to 1 1/2 years for the Expo extension to Surrey
It's worth noting that the Translink study they source in the original article is this one. I'm not sure if we're still on that timetable.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2024, 7:20 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
On the other hand, doesn't Link have some of the highest construction costs/km in the world? There's definitely a price to be paid when you work under an approve first-ask questions later system.

Personally though, I think Skytrain pretty easily pays for itself due to the implicit economic and social benefits rapid transit provides, so I'm always amenable to fast tracking it, so to speak.
Link is going in to a built-up environment much later, and it's grade separated. It ain't cheap either but I believe it does pay for itself.

The Broadway extension is half a Billion per km and we'll be lucky if the "easier" half to UBC isn't more once it actually happens.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2024, 7:28 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 1,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
The Broadway extension is half a Billion per km and we'll be lucky if the "easier" half to UBC isn't more once it actually happens.
Not a chance it will be. It's going to be tunneled until at least the Jericho Lands, if not the whole way. You can also attribute planning work for that back to the 1997 plans for the Millennium line and all the phasing, so going on 27+ years of planning process.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2024, 7:29 PM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Link is going in to a built-up environment much later, and it's grade separated. It ain't cheap either but I believe it does pay for itself.

The Broadway extension is half a Billion per km and we'll be lucky if the "easier" half to UBC isn't more once it actually happens.
The West Seattle Link Extension is supposed to be around $1.3 billion CAD per km ($1.5 billion USD per mile) and most of the route isn't even underground.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2024, 12:23 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,491
Also remember that LRT vehicles weigh more than SklyTrain vehicles.
LRT vehicles are designed to withstand crashes in traffic (even if they do not mix with traffic).
That means the guideways need to be beefier.
I've noticed that the Seattle guideways are much chunkier than the Vancouver guideways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2025, 11:41 PM
BaddieB BaddieB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 645
Any updates? I hear construction is happening but haven't seen much.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2025, 3:21 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,491
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:41 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.