Quote:
Originally Posted by Xelebes
The President's Trophy probably should be considered an entirely different challenge than winning the Stanley Cup. It's no longer a matter of luck that the winner of the President's Trophy doesn't go on to win the Stanley Cup. To win one, you basically have to give up hope that you will win the Stanley Cup, largely as a result of how you have the players playing. You work all the players in the regular season, not leaving players in reserve. You have thirty two teams in the league so at a certain point you have to make choices.
|
Statistically, this is not true. Presidents Trophy winners have a greater chance than any other position of winning the Stanley Cup. 8 of the last 40 years, a Presidents Trophy winner goes on to win the cup.
However, with each passing year, it becomes more and more difficult to win both awards. In 1986, there were 21 teams. Today, there are 32 teams. The NHL is notorious for upsets in the playoffs. In 7 of the last 10 years, the Presidents Trophy winners have lost the second round.
Another factor in play, is small market Canadian teams like the Jets and Oilers are at a massive disadvantage at the trade deadline, as most players have the teams on their "no trade list." So realistically, teams in Florida, Texas, and Las Vegas have the advantage of luring top talent with 6 weeks to go in the season.
Word has it that there was a deal made by Winnipeg to trade away Ehlers, for a skilled #2C (something that the team desperately needed), only to have the player refuse to remove Winnipeg from his "NMC/NTC" This is precisely why Canada has not won a Stanley Cup in 32 years. Most players do not want to come to Canada.