HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 8:06 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
The rest of the world called. They'd like to have a word with you about this.
The difference is that North America is a sea of English, as is also the case in Australia and New Zealand. Other parts of the world are entirely different with no linguistic group being so dominant over such a wide area. Because of the degree of interaction with other linguistic groups, more people naturally learn other languages.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 8:13 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
Again, this is based on the fallacy that being unilingual is an unchangeable status like the colour of one's skin.

So these people willingly left government jobs instead of taking a stab at learning French?

Hard to believe that, or at least to be sympathetic.
It is a known fact that people's abilities to learn another language decline with age and not all people have the same natural proficiency at learning other languages as an adult. Some are naturals, some are not. I remember reading that it has something to do with how people hear.

Regardless, I think a lot of people do not want to have to learn completely new skills late in their careers and this is not limited to languages.

We should not judge people to that degree.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 9:12 PM
Bandage Bandage is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 37
Quebec would do itself a huge favour by recognizing English as an official language. Until that happens, I'm not giving francophones an inch when it comes to language laws. The hypocrisy just stinks too much.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 10:37 PM
Urbanarchit Urbanarchit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
It is a known fact that people's abilities to learn another language decline with age and not all people have the same natural proficiency at learning other languages as an adult. Some are naturals, some are not. I remember reading that it has something to do with how people hear.

Regardless, I think a lot of people do not want to have to learn completely new skills late in their careers and this is not limited to languages.

We should not judge people to that degree.
My degree in Linguistics comes in handy.

The ability to learn a language does not actually decline with age, but rather the facility to acquire it changes due to the more matured brain of an adult being neurologically different to that of a child. For example, studies find that children are better able to perceive a language's phonology more easily than an adult. Adults are still able to learn to speak and can achieve near-native fluency, but for them it can be a longer process to speak without much of an accent. Often, they will achieve a certain level of intelligibility and then plateau. You might be familiar with people who have thick accents despite living in a country and speaking that language for several years or longer as a result of this. Every human can produce the Spanish trilled 'r' or Arabic's pharyngeal fricatives. But as we grow into adults, we become used to exercising muscles/ organs used to produce certain speech sounds in our quotidian language. So, as an adult you may struggle with French's <u> or <eu> (as in pûr or feuille if [y, œ, ø] aren't in your language. But you can still learn those phonemes with practice. Having a speech language pathologist or a teacher trained in either that or linguistics would help as well. You might still have an accent, but you can learn to speak proficiently.

On a side note, those vowels are easy to produce, as it's a matter of "rounding your lips" as you do with <o> and <u> while saying "ee" or "ay".

As far as successful acquisition of the syntax and semantics, children's brains learn differently than an adult's. But adults still maintain the ability to learn languages, just as much as an adult is capable of learning anything. For monolingual speakers, they will continue to learn their own language throughout the rest of their lives. They will come into new vocabulary that they haven't previous encountered, and can successfully learn those new words. This is also the case with slang, jargon, and colloquialisms. The challenge with learning another language's syntax depends on one's ability to learn to think differently. For Indo-European languages like French and English, syntactically we're very similar, but the way we express some things differs. Learning to use imparfait, passé composé, plusqueparfait might be hard for us to understand at first because English expresses past/ completed actions differently. But in this case it's a matter of understanding chronology. Otherwise, word ordering and more can be "bullshitted" and calques can be used to express oneself even without complete knowledge of the grammar. Learning a non-Indo-European language is harder for us because the syntax will be different, and therefore "bullshitting" will be less sucessful. Japanese is an agglutinative language in the Altaic family. Sentences can consist of one verb only with multiple affixes attached to express different aspects (positive/negative, present/past, polite/rude), but can be changed to indicate potential, who does which action, wondering, etc. The sentence structure is completely different than English, too, with the ordering being SOV (subject-object-verb). So for an Anglophone learning Japanese, it can be challenging. Yet successfully acquiring the grammar is achieved merely by learning to think differently (think in the way Japanese is thought instead of how you express yourself in English).

People's ability to acquire new languages is not so much about hearing as it is about the activation of the limbic system. Our limbic system consists of different "primitive" parts of the brain that are responsible for emotion and memory. Essentially, if you are not motivated to learn something, you won't be successful at learning even if you try. The part of your brain responsible for remembering and recalling what you learn wasn't being activated properly, and therefore you won't be capable of encoding that information on the brain. This lack of motivation might be an emotional response to being forced to do or learn something you don't want, or even being too tired.

For example, someone might go through our education system and not be able to speak French very well. They may claim that they just aren't able to learn languages like other people. But their attempt to learn French was forced upon them by the education system, and typically the method of instruction fails to teach it properly. But on their own they might develop an interest in another country, like Japan. They love television, food, culture, fashion, geography, history, etc. from Japan, such that they want to visit, live in and absorb anything Japanese into their being. They will try to learn Japanese and, unlike with French, they become fluent speaking it. This is because they are personally motivated to learn Japanese as a result in their interest in Japan. However, they still can't speak French, which is a result in them not having the same emotional connection to the culture and language of Francophones.

So in short, every adult is capable of becoming bilingual/ polyglots (even those with learning disabilities or speech impediments). However, their success depends on their motivation and emotional response to learning the language, just as it is with learning anything. Compared to children, adults may seem to struggle to learn other languages, but that is merely because adult brains are wired differently than children's, and thus absorb language differently. This doesn't mean adults can't learn languages or that only a few "naturals" can.

Our second language instruction in Canada is quite inefficient. Part of this has to do with method of instruction, ability to use it, but the willingness of students to learn it. Teachers are expected to excited students to learn French by teaching them more than just grammar, but especially introducing them to aspects of culture that will appeal to them.

Last edited by Urbanarchit; Jun 1, 2017 at 11:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 11:25 PM
Norman Bates Norman Bates is online now
Living With My Mother
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbanarchit View Post
My degree in Linguistics comes in handy.

The ability to learn a language does not actually decline with age, but rather the facility to acquire it changes due to the more matured brain of an adult compared to that of a child. For example, studies find that children are better able to perceive and a language's phonology most easily than an adult. Adults are still able to learn to speak, and can achieve near-native fluency, but for them it can be a longer process to speak without much of an accent. Often, they will achieve a certain level successful intelligibility and then plateau. You might be familiar with people who have thick accents despite living in a country and speaking that language for several years or longer as a result of this. Every human can produce the Spanish trilled 'r' or Arabic's pharyngeal fricatives. But as we grow into adults, we become used to exercising muscles/ organs used to produce speech sounds in our quotidian language. So, as an adult you may struggle with French's <u> or <eu> (as in pûr or feuille if [y, œ, ø] aren't in your language. But you can still learn those phonemes with practice. Having a speech language pathologist or a teacher trained in either that or linguistics would help as well. You might still have an accent, but you can learn to speak proficiently.

On a side note, those vowels are easy to produce, as it's a matter of "rounding your lips" as you do with <o> and <u> while saying "ee" or "ay".

As far as successful acquisition of the syntax and semantics, children's brains learn differently than an adult. But adults still maintain the ability to learn languages, just as much as an adult is capable of learning anything. For monolingual speakers, they will continue to learn their own language throughout the rest of their lives. They will come into new vocabulary that haven't previous encountered, and can successfully learn those new words. This is also the case with slang, jargon, and colloquialisms. The challenge with learn another language's syntax depends on one's ability to learn to think different. For Indo-European languages like French and English, syntactically we're very similar, but the way we express some things differs. Learning to use imparfait, passé composé, plusqueparfait might be hard for us to understand at first because English expresses actions in the past/ completed actions differently. But it's a matter of understanding chronology. Otherwise, word ordering and more can be "bullshitted" and calques can be used to express oneself even without complete instruction on the grammar. Learning a non-Indo-European language is harder because the syntax will be different, and therefore "bullshitting" will be less sucessful. Japanese is an agglutinative language in the Altaic family. Sentences can consist of one verb only with multiple affixes attached to express different aspects (positive/negative, present/past, polite/rude), but can be changed to indicate potential, who does which action, wondering, etc. The sentence structure is completely different than English, too. So for an Anglophone learning Japanse, it is challenging. But successfully acquiring the grammar is achieved merely by learning to think differently (think in the way Japanese is thought instead of how you express yourself in English).

People's ability to acquire new languages is not so much about hearing as it is about the activation of the limbic system. Our limbic system consists of different "primative" parts of the brain that are responsible for emotion and memory. Essentially, if you are not motivated to learn something, you won't be successful at learning it if you try. The part of your brain responsible for remembering and recalling what you learn wasn't being activated properly, and therefore you won't be capable of encoding that information on the brain. This lack of motivation might be an emotional response to being forced to do or learn something you don't want, or even being too tired.
For example, someone might go through our education system and not be able to speak French very well. They may claim that they just aren't able to learn languages like other people. But their attempt to learn French was forced upon them by the education system, and typically the method of instruction fails to teach it properly. But on their own they might develop an interest in another country, like Japan. They love television, food, culture, fashion, geography, history, etc. from Japan, such that they want to visit, live in and absorb anything Japanese into their being. They will try to learn Japanese, and unlike with French, they become fluent speaking it. This is because they are personally motivated to learn Japanese due to their interest in Japan. However, they still can't speak French, which is a result in them not having the same emotional connection to the culture and language of Francophones.

So in short, every adult is capable of becoming bilingual/ polyglots (even those with learning disabilities or speech impediments). However, their success depends on their motivation and emotional response to learning the language, just as it is with anything. Compared to children, adults may seem to struggle to learn other languages, but that is merely because adult brains are wired differently than children's, and thus absorb language differently. This doesn't mean adults can't learn languages or that only a few "naturals" can.

Our second language instruction in Canada is quite inefficient. Part of this has to do with method of instruction, ability to use it, but the willingness of students to learn it. Teachers are expected to excited students to learn French by teaching them more than just grammar, but introducing them to aspects of culture that will appeal.
Absolutely epic post. Hopefully not lost on the anglophone audience.

I grew up in an anglophone enclave of a francophone community. Mine was the token English class in the french school. I struggled with the language in part due to the heavy bias carried by my parents and neighbors. But over time I grew to appreciate the language and culture. Eventually I went from speaking with french words in English sentence structures to truly speaking french. I consider it my greatest academic achievement and most fulfilling intellectual endeavour. It left me feeling truly Canadian.

However, a couple of other barriers remain:

- While francophones always seem honoured to hear an anglophone try to speak french they frequently shift to English to speed up the interaction or save themselves from an impromptu french lesson. This is not helpful and downright discouraging.

- Official bilingualism should mean that people are tested in both languages. I have heard many a francophone truly incapable of doing their language justice. Particularly in a business environment. Similarly, Anglophones should not be exempt from testing in English either.

As it relates to the current situation in the city of Ottawa, I see no benefit to changing the pragmatic approach currently in place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 1:51 AM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,598
Thank you to the last two posters for sharing your knowledge and experience.

I am always eager to gain a better understanding.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 2:30 AM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
It is a known fact that people's abilities to learn another language decline with age and not all people have the same natural proficiency at learning other languages as an adult. Some are naturals, some are not. I remember reading that it has something to do with how people hear.

Regardless, I think a lot of people do not want to have to learn completely new skills late in their careers and this is not limited to languages.

We should not judge people to that degree.
Anyone who would have been faced with this surprise dilemma ("Guess what Delmer, you're gonna need French for your job from now on...") would have retired long ago.

The federal government has been straightforward and transparent with its language requirements for employees for several decades. There are no excuses at this point.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 2:45 AM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
The difference is that North America is a sea of English, as is also the case in Australia and New Zealand. Other parts of the world are entirely different with no linguistic group being so dominant over such a wide area. Because of the degree of interaction with other linguistic groups, more people naturally learn other languages.
Puh-leese. Ottawa abuts a French-speaking city that's one third of its size. One-third of Ottawa's metro is French-speaking. Ottawa is right across the river from a mainly French-speaking province of 8 million people. It's the second-most populated province in the country, with the second-biggest city which happens to be the closest "big city" to Ottawa. French is also an official language of the country and an important job requirement for Ottawa's main employer. A good chunk of Ottawa's population (way more than the 10-15% that are francophone according to the stats) have French Canadian roots even if the language has been lost or lapsed. French is also not some obscure language, it's one of the world's most widely spoken languages. Arguably it's the most widely spoken lingua franca in the world after English.

Those are pretty good motivators in favour of learning French if you're a non-francophone in Ottawa. (The motivators for learning English in many parts of the world are likely less compelling than those for learning French in Ottawa.)

The problem is in people's heads and hearts.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 2:51 AM
YOWflier's Avatar
YOWflier YOWflier is offline
Melissa: fabulous.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: YOW/CYOW/CUUP
Posts: 3,159
If only the playing field was level. If the competency (and evaluation!) standard was the same for English as it is for French, many would be less frustrated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 2:59 AM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by ac888yow View Post
If only the playing field was level. If the competency (and evaluation!) standard was the same for English as it is for French, many would be less frustrated.
I'm admittedly not close enough to it to make a full judgement, but I am still pretty skeptical of this notion.

I know and know of quite a few people who speak almost no French for whom the language requirements of a bilingual position were "bent" for them. This includes family members BTW.

OTOH I don't know a single francophone who works in the federal public service who could be said to be unilingual in French.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 3:08 AM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
I'm admittedly not close enough to it to make a full judgement, but I am still pretty skeptical of this notion.

I know and know of quite a few people who speak almost no French for whom the language requirements of a bilingual position were "bent" for them. This includes family members BTW.

OTOH I don't know a single francophone who works in the federal public service who could be said to be unilingual in French.
Yeah, there's plenty of managers and division heads in the federal government who will bend the rules to get effectively unilingual anglos hired. In the department I work in, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, this is extremely common. Much of this is due to the fact that the department is heavily based in Western Canada (both in the people it serves and where much of its staff are) so the practical relevance of French is diminished compared to the rest of the government.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 3:14 AM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
Yeah, there's plenty of managers and division heads in the federal government who will bend the rules to get effectively unilingual anglos hired. In the department I work in, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, this is extremely common. Much of this is due to the fact that the department is heavily based in Western Canada (both in the people it serves and where much of its staff are) so the practical relevance of French is diminished compared to the rest of the government.
Without being an expert, and even if I am a supporter of bilingualism in the federal government, I am willing to admit that it might not be optimally implemented in the public service. Even today.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 3:19 AM
YOWflier's Avatar
YOWflier YOWflier is offline
Melissa: fabulous.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: YOW/CYOW/CUUP
Posts: 3,159
So be sceptical. I see it every single day.

Remember I said competency standard. I didn't say anything about being unilingual. If one's capabilities, both written and spoken, had to be demonstrably equivalent in English and in French for a bilingual position, I'd be all for it. Instead, I see high French standards and embarrassingly low (or absent altogether) English standards.

So the bar for Anglos is higher, which pisses them off to no end.

Your point about the rule being "bent" is somewhat true in my experience, although it tends to be for management positions, especially ones that are difficult to fill. I've never seen working level position language rules bent.

Last edited by YOWflier; Jun 2, 2017 at 3:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 3:56 AM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by ac888yow View Post
So be sceptical. I see it every single day.

Remember I said competency standard. I didn't say anything about being unilingual. If one's capabilities, both written and spoken, had to be demonstrably equivalent in English and in French for a bilingual position, I'd be all for it. Instead, I see high French standards and embarrassingly low (or absent altogether) English standards.

So the bar for Anglos is higher, which pisses them off to no end.

Your point about the rule being "bent" is somewhat true in my experience, although it tends to be for management positions, especially ones that are difficult to fill. I've never seen working level position language rules bent.
Mine were bent. At least, I'm pretty sure they were. I can't confirm it. And I was a fairly ordinary IT hire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 10:15 AM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by ac888yow View Post
So be sceptical. I see it every single day.

Remember I said competency standard. I didn't say anything about being unilingual. If one's capabilities, both written and spoken, had to be demonstrably equivalent in English and in French for a bilingual position, I'd be all for it. Instead, I see high French standards and embarrassingly low (or absent altogether) English standards.

So the bar for Anglos is higher, which pisses them off to no end.

Your point about the rule being "bent" is somewhat true in my experience, although it tends to be for management positions, especially ones that are difficult to fill. I've never seen working leve
l position language rules bent.
So you are saying the rules do get bent for unilingual anglos who don't meet the requirement of their jobs, but only for the really good jobs?

Made me laugh.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 12:19 PM
YOWflier's Avatar
YOWflier YOWflier is offline
Melissa: fabulous.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: YOW/CYOW/CUUP
Posts: 3,159
No, what I'm saying is that I've seen the silly rule occasionally bent in cases where there is a dire need for leadership and no other candidate comes up to the plate.

As it should be.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 12:56 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 25,989
More broadly, I know that the Department I worked for revised its official language testing about 10 or 12 years ago to address a widespread perception that the standards being applied for French language testing were more rigorous than for the other official language. The result - a number of anglophones who had been at "C" level for years were tested and granted "Exempt" status (I was one of them).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 1:17 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post

The federal government has been straightforward and transparent with its language requirements for employees for several decades.
Do you want to buy a bridge in Brooklyn?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 1:35 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 25,989
The rules can also be bent in compassionate ways - I know of an anglophone civil servant appointed to a bilingual position involving both management responsibilities and some public profile who was not able to meet the "C" level requirement due to a learning disability.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 1:58 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
The rules can also be bent in compassionate ways - I know of an anglophone civil servant appointed to a bilingual position involving both management responsibilities and some public profile who was not able to meet the "C" level requirement due to a learning disability.
I seriously doubt that any reasonable person would have a problem with that.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:22 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.