Quote:
Originally Posted by Via Chicago
yea, i would say it boils down to tax incentives, period. obviously having a diverse amount of locations and backdrops helps. but overall, you can film anywhere today and turn it into somewhere else if you really want to. at the end of the day, Dick Wolf shows are as generic as they come. theyre surface level cop/firefighter/ER dramas. if the film office wasnt offering incentives, i doubt they would have shot as many shows here regardless of the skyline. its not like the Wire which was dealing with social and political issues of Baltimore, and was written explicitly for that locale.
|
No, it's not simply about tax incentives. The tax incentives are sort of a prerequisite for seeing film production at all, but it's not like we're outgunning other states/locales with an aggressive incentive, in places where film production is REALLY being driven by incentives more than anything else (Louisiana, Michigan, Georgia – see Barbershop 3 filmed in Atlanta but set in Chicago).
What's driving film production in Chicago is a mixture of tax incentives, a pool of talented actors, the Cinespace ecosystem, the unique features of the cityscape, and a constant pool of young aspiring filmmakers from a number of local universities (including Columbia College, which has the most film majors of any school in the country).
Dick Wolf set his shows here because we're the largest metro that isn't jaded by media coverage. He got a built-in audience that wouldn't have cared in LA or NY.