HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Photography Forums > My City Photos


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2011, 10:52 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 21,095
This has a short overview. Votes failed in 1968 and 1970. Our federal money, already earmarked, went to MARTA instead.

http://www.lightrailnow.org/facts/fa_sea_2009-11a.htm

http://slumberland.org/wp/2008/10/15/1967-seattle-area-transit-plan/

Last edited by mhays; Nov 17, 2011 at 11:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2011, 4:34 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
Too bad.
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2011, 6:54 PM
atlantaguy's Avatar
atlantaguy atlantaguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Area code 404
Posts: 3,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
Too bad.
Not for us.

And I say that as someone who adores Seattle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2011, 8:09 PM
STLgasm's Avatar
STLgasm STLgasm is offline
Red brick mama.
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: City of St. Louis
Posts: 4,740
Seattle looks like a city that's impossible not to like. Great pics, Cirrus.
__________________
http://stl-style.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2011, 11:27 PM
mthq's Avatar
mthq mthq is offline
Registirred User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Alaska
Posts: 10,372
Great pics again Cirrus.

Quote:
Originally Posted by atlantaguy View Post
Not for us.
HAHA!

thanks for the link, mhays. I too have got to read up on this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2011, 10:32 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays View Post
This has a short overview. Votes failed in 1968 and 1970. Our federal money, already earmarked, went to MARTA instead.

http://www.lightrailnow.org/facts/fa_sea_2009-11a.htm

http://slumberland.org/wp/2008/10/15/1967-seattle-area-transit-plan/
Thanks for the info, I wonder what Seattle would look like today had they built rapid transit in the 70s. It would've probably spurred Vancouver and Portland on in building their systems alot sooner too. The whole of the Pacific Northwest would probably be alot more urban than it is today, what a shame.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2011, 4:32 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 21,095
In the same era, we also downzoned most of the city to avoid getting any nasty new highrises. And we rounded up and shipped off most of our Chinese community in the late 1800s. Then we reduced building heights Downtown through the CAP initiative in 1988 or so, which was a revolt against the boom going on at the time (oddly, the larger trigger was probably Bus Tunnel and over-freeway Convention Center construction). We have a long list of mistakes...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2011, 11:46 AM
Danny's Avatar
Danny Danny is offline
Universal Traveler
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Madrid
Posts: 2,165
Smile

Thanks again for this thread about Seattle.

I like all these neighbourhoods, specially Green Lake and Roosevelt.

Nice colours. Fall is show there!

Congratulations and greetings from Madrid, Spain!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2011, 4:00 PM
Centropolis's Avatar
Centropolis Centropolis is offline
disneypilled verhoevenist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: saint louis
Posts: 12,052
Just super, I enjoyed the visual journey.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 6:47 PM
destroycreate's Avatar
destroycreate destroycreate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,675
Just out of curiosity, how urban would Seattle "feel" coming from someone who lives in San Francisco? It's definitely a city I could potentially see mysefl living in. Obviously I get the density/walkability would not be on the same scale, but would it feel like a San Diego in the PNW? How urban and walkable is it compared to Vancouver or Portland? I'm super excited about all the light rail development Seattle has these days, I don't think any US city is moving forward at such a rapid pace.

I'm interested in Seattle b/c I've always loved to the Pacific Northwest, but the job market in Vancouver is terrible (so I hear), it would be a hassle as a non-Canadian to move there, and for me Portland is too small and provincial (albeit lovely).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2012, 8:39 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 21,095
Portland has more rail than Seattle but less transit usage. Vancouver has more of both.

Seattle is much denser, more walkable, and more transit-friendly than San Diego, in every measurable.

Portland's narrow streets give it a walkability edge in some regards. It's like SF in terms of streets, but not very dense. But being flat makes walking easier.

San Francisco is much more urban. On the urbanity scale I'd estimate that what Seattle is to San Diego, San Francisco is to Seattle. But Seattle is narrowing the gap in core districts.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2012, 8:53 PM
seaJ seaJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by destroycreate View Post
Just out of curiosity, how urban would Seattle "feel" coming from someone who lives in San Francisco? It's definitely a city I could potentially see mysefl living in. Obviously I get the density/walkability would not be on the same scale, but would it feel like a San Diego in the PNW? How urban and walkable is it compared to Vancouver or Portland? I'm super excited about all the light rail development Seattle has these days, I don't think any US city is moving forward at such a rapid pace.

I'm interested in Seattle b/c I've always loved to the Pacific Northwest, but the job market in Vancouver is terrible (so I hear), it would be a hassle as a non-Canadian to move there, and for me Portland is too small and provincial (albeit lovely).
Well, I would say that depends on what your notion of urbanity is. If you are strictly speaking of density and transit then I would say Vancouver would feel the most urban in that sense. If however, you are speaking of how urban a city is by what the city offers on a cultural/economic basis I would say Seattle is the most urban with Portland and Vancouver after that. There are differing combinations/amounts of both notions in all three.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2012, 9:00 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays View Post
Seattle is much denser, more walkable, and more transit-friendly than San Diego, in every measurable.

Portland's narrow streets give it a walkability edge.

On the urbanity scale, what Seattle is to San Diego, San Francisco is to Seattle.
I agree.

Having been to SF, SD, Seattle, Portland, and Vancouver all exactly one time.
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Photography Forums > My City Photos
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:14 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.