HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2007, 8:09 PM
BCTed BCTed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,299
By the way, I do now believe that the truck is real, having seen the video. However, it seems quite apparent that the Spectator hired that truck to pass by the intersection on cue. If you watch the way in which Paul Wilson is speaking in the clip, you'll note that his speech has a very unnatural pacing to it. It is as if he has set up his cadence in order to properly time what he is saying to coincide with the truck passing by.

He was uttering the word "decay" just as the truck passed by... he wanted to make certain that that word was given special emphasis. Paul Wilson is a master showman and attention-grabber. The man knows what he is doing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2007, 8:10 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by the dude View Post
sweet rant! pretty much nailed it there. i don't think we'll read that in the spec tomorrow, though.
I've spent too much time at the hall......it doesn't take long to learn this stuff.
If the Spec chooses to fluff over it, don't be surprised.
They've been doing it for years....in fact, they've been a part of it for years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2007, 8:15 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCTed View Post
By the way, I do now believe that the truck is real, having seen the video. However, it seems quite apparent that the Spectator hired that truck to pass by the intersection on cue. If you watch the way in which Paul Wilson is speaking in the clip, you'll note that his speech has a very unnatural pacing to it. It is as if he has set up his cadence in order to properly time what he is saying to coincide with the truck passing by.

He was uttering the word "decay" just as the truck passed by... he wanted to make certain that that word was given special emphasis. Paul Wilson is a master showman and attention-grabber. The man knows what he is doing.
LOL! delusional! haha I get it though. I noticed that Paul Wilson talks with his head side ways, I can't stand that as eventually when you are listening your head begins to tilt down as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2007, 9:13 PM
HAMRetrofit's Avatar
HAMRetrofit HAMRetrofit is offline
Pro Urban Degenerate
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto-Hamilton Mega Region
Posts: 839
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCTed View Post
By the way, I do now believe that the truck is real, having seen the video. However, it seems quite apparent that the Spectator hired that truck to pass by the intersection on cue. If you watch the way in which Paul Wilson is speaking in the clip, you'll note that his speech has a very unnatural pacing to it. It is as if he has set up his cadence in order to properly time what he is saying to coincide with the truck passing by. .
Yeah he seems like the real strategic thinking type from his video.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCTed View Post
He was uttering the word "decay" just as the truck passed by... he wanted to make certain that that word was given special emphasis. Paul Wilson is a master showman and attention-grabber. The man knows what he is doing.
It looks more as though he is astounded by the noise and ground virations of the 34 wheel transport truck and double gravel tandum wagon that flew by about 15 feet from his body.

Seems like the type of environment that people want to want to buy up property and raise kids in. People must be buying up property like crazy to open stores along Main. Must be a hot real estate area along there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2007, 10:06 PM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,800
damn dudes...

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2007, 12:35 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
just when I thought the Spec couldn't get any worse, they pull this off.
Monday's edition - the big "city hall" report. Don't waste your time.
Shows how far in the sack the Spec is with these groups.

Amazing.
For a moment I thought they might finally dive into the real problems at city hall.....for example (to use their own screwed-up example) the Maple Leaf deal.
Backroom dealing, bad politics, lack of open-ness and then blameshifting when the truth starts to come out.
Read more here:

http://www.raisethehammer.org/blog.asp?id=352

Time to cancel my Spec subscription...the less eyes reading this piece of crap the better for the future of our city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2007, 1:27 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
A starting point: change city hall
Infighting among politicians, delays in acting on developers requests, a lack of professionalism. It all tarnishes the view of Hamilton held by potential investors. There s a call to change the way the city does business and strong leadership.

PART TWO OF SEVEN
BY NICOLE MacINTYRE

Invisible to the naked eye, but painfully clear to investors, there is said to be a neon sign that flashes in front of City Hall: CLOSED.

The sign burns brighter with every council squabble, leadership gaffe and bureaucracy bumble. Its glare has shone across the province, if not the country, into boardrooms and business lunches, earning Hamilton a deadly reputation.

“There’s an impression,” says John Dolbec of Hamilton’s Chamber of Commerce, “that we’re not open for business as a community.”

The perception is undoubtedly far worse than the reality. Still, it’s there.

Observers lay the blame on the front steps of City Hall. It is viewed as a political snakepit, accused of allowing the greater good of the city to fall victim to power struggles, narrowminded vision and parochialism. Even senior staff believe that planning for growth, transportation and infrastructure has fallen woefully behind. The official plan, a comprehensive zoning bylaw and a scheme to stage development all remain in the works.

Businesses need predictability, and Hamilton is rarely predictable.

The Maple Leaf Foods dispute of 2005 is considered a case study. The Fortune 500 company wanted to build a $250-million pork-processing plant on the Mountain. Barely in the door, a handful of councillors went on the attack.

The resulting public circus, in the words of one observer, was more fitting of a proposal to invite a toxic waste dump into the city.

It was not the reluctance to welcome the company that other investors say frightened them, but what they consider a lack of professionalism and unwillingness to let the process unfold without bias.

“It was a public flogging of an investor,” recalls then mayor Larry Di Ianni.

To complicate matters, investors find city staff reluctant to take risks or make decisions for fear of being smacked down by their political masters. In a market where investors expect — if not demand — to hear yes and hear it quickly, they say the answer from Hamilton is too often no. Or worse, it takes months to hear any answer at all.

“I don’t think there’s a clear sense of urgency,” says planning consultant Ed Fothergill. He likens the city to a grocery store. For years Hamilton has been saying it was open for business and eager for investment.

Dozens of customers — mainly housing and commercial developers from Hamilton and down the road — are now waiting in line, cash in hand, frustrated as they try to make it to the register, said Fothergill.

“It’s like the city doesn’t have enough cashiers.”

The danger for Hamilton, of course, is that there are lots of other grocery stores open with no lines.

Companies can pick and choose where they do business, forcing municipalities to be competitive. Patience and hoop-jumping are not skills investors are interested in developing, as Richmond Hill recently learned.

Honda Canada, frustrated with delays and red tape, pulled plans to build its head office in the Toronto suburb, fleeing to rival Markham’s open arms.

“They saw a municipality that was willing to work with them and make things happen quickly,” Markham’s Mayor Frank Scarpitti reflected in the aftermath of the deal.

Hamilton has the unfortunate distinction of being surrounded by cities that are known to be business friendly.

The joke goes, according to Dolbec, that Brantford rolls out the red carpet, while Hamilton rolls out the red tape.

At Hamilton’s annual state of the city address by the mayor last month, several business people independently point to the man they think has the potential to help rid the city of its mess.

That man is not behind the podium, but in the crowd. He’s Tim McCabe, the city’s new director of planning and economic development.

He came from Kitchener five years ago and took over the beleaguered department last spring. There are many late nights and early mornings as McCabe tries to translate his new vision for the city to staff and council.

His formal proposal for more investment in economic development is in the works with the mayor’s support. In the meantime, McCabe is trying to empower staff, strip away the bureaucracy and push customer service.

“Hamilton has very old culture still in its organization,” he says. “We have to change. We have no choice.”

His ultimate goal is to have one-stop shopping for investors, a Canadian first. No red tape, just one form to fill out and one fee to pay. At the same time, he wants his staff out knocking on the doors of local businesses, cognizant that 80 per cent of a city’s growth comes from within.

In the business community, there is excitement in the air. But it is tempered with cynicism, the Hamilton reflex to wonder if anything will really happen.

The bureaucracy is changing, but will the politicians?

The man to answer that question is not the leader the business community appeared to support with donations and endorsements last fall. That was Di Ianni. Still, Mayor Fred Eisenberger is promising to change the culture at City Hall.

He’s pulled his defiant council away to private retreats to work on their differences and rebuild trust with senior staff. Though encouraged, Eisenberger knows evidence of any significant change wouldn’t be clear until council faces whatever big decision comes next.

“How we conduct ourselves and how we approach problems is indicative of how successful we’re going to be.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2007, 3:42 PM
the dude the dude is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,812
you see? i knew the spec wouldn't take this seriously. they're incapable, inept, corrupt and delusional. dollars to donuts terry cooke wrote this bizarre piece. the very idea of including di ianni in this ‘study’ boggles the mind, though cooke would have seen it as valid, no doubt. can’t believe this was the best they could come up with.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2007, 6:08 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
if they want to blame anyone for Maple Leaf it's DiIanni himself.
and the beat goes on......
Hamilton will revitalize itself just fine IN SPITE of the mafia media/city hall we have.
Local residents, business owners and entrepeneurs are the ones turning this city around....if the Spec and city hall can just stay out of the way we'll be fine.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 1:38 AM
Goldfinger Goldfinger is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 242
Quote:
Originally Posted by raisethehammer View Post
if they want to blame anyone for Maple Leaf it's DiIanni himself.
and the beat goes on......
Hamilton will revitalize itself just fine IN SPITE of the mafia media/city hall we have.
Local residents, business owners and entrepeneurs are the ones turning this city around....if the Spec and city hall can just stay out of the way we'll be fine.
I would watch the "mafia" comments. Are you saying Italian organized crime groups are influencing city hall?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 1:57 AM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
ever read this:
http://www.amazon.com/Their-Town-Maf.../dp/088862266X

nothing's changed my friend.

Remember this:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl.../National/home

that's just one story....you'd be stunned to know what goes on over there. Most isn't reported to the public. I wonder if anything ever happened to this guy at the Globe?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 1:58 AM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
ps....not necessarily Italian.
I think the term mafia relates to various organized crime groups....they can be from anywhere, not just Italy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 2:41 AM
the dude the dude is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,812
interesting article. there's a reason i always referred to the previous mayor as 'don' di ianni. it's a fine line in this town.

ya, there have been plenty of notorious irish and jewish mobsters on this continent: the west end gang [frank ryan] of montreal; bugsy seigel; meyer lansky; and the list goes on. oh, let's not forget the russians, too. hate to leave them out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 11:26 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
Short-term pain essential for city's long-term gain?

PART THREE OF SEVEN
John Kernaghan
The Hamilton Spectator
(Oct 2, 2007)

The forecast calls for pain, the kind taxpayers get in the back when they carry most of the load.

As a broad prescription, many observers feel some more short-term hurt is needed to jolt Hamilton out of an economic rut. That and a consensus-maker extraordinaire to sell the notion to skeptical politicians and long-suffering ratepayers.

Brace yourself. Here are some hard suggestions from insiders and observers of Hamilton's economy.

* Live without planned improvements to existing roads, sidewalks and other housekeeping so new roads and sewers can open up development lands.

* Subsidize new businesses for the city core to a greater degree, building on tax relief and other incentive programs. Also consider more partnerships incorporating both public and private money.

* Provide the city's economic development department with the money and bodies so that it can work on three key areas: Selling businesses on that new serviced land, aggressively work to retain existing manufacturing and push brownfield development.

That's a regimen of economic medication sure to make some folks ill.

This is how the trade-off would work: ask Hamiltonians to pay higher taxes or live without the kind of capital programs they see and experience daily on their streets so that the city can service land, deliver new businesses and produce long-term gain in the form of those businesses picking up more of the tax bill down the road.

In sum, you'd ask someone with crumbling sidewalks to live with that while services for Hamilton's industrial parks were made a priority.

The payoff? Right now the tax load is split 60 per cent residential, 40 per cent business. In the city's glory years it was the reverse. Could it be again?

The loss of jobs over time, 11,600 in manufacturing in 2006 alone, and smaller economic blows has left Hamilton with a $302-million debt and one of the highest poverty levels in Ontario. Moreover, the lifeblood of growth, immigration, has slowed as newcomers bypass the city.

It all starts with the city's economic development office, a key point of access to this city for developers, industry and business. That department has just seven bodies to promote growth and retain existing enterprises. Most agree that it could surely use a boost, particularly as it unfurls later this month a course adjustment for a strategic plan. The department is likely to recommend a more intense focus on clusters of freight and delivery businesses which would benefit from the city's transportation grid, biotech industries and green energy technology like windmill manufacturing and related industry.

But perhaps something even more radical is needed for the department. Other cities have revamped economic development into new forms, cities like Burlington, Halifax and Winnipeg.

Right next door Team Burlington collects city, tourism and business offices under one roof for one-stop shopping. (See accompanying story).

Halifax's plan centres on changing attitudes internally and perceptions of the port city from outside with a focus on retraining and quick adjustments to the whims of markets in a public-private partnership.

Winnipeg, meantime, pushes serviced shovel-ready land and low business costs as inducements.

The Halifax mode, fixing a muddied image, is a popular theme for critics of Hamilton, who prefer action to fancy labels like The Waterfall City. To polish an image, then be unable to deliver on interest generated, is viewed as wasted money.

Many say that first and foremost, Hamilton needs what Winnipeg is pushing, serviced land. It's the No. 1 problem facing the city's economic development department. The city simply starves for shovel-ready land with spines of road, sewers and water pipe for new businesses and industries to plug into.

There is a ready list of interested parties for that newly serviced land. Toronto-area industrial realtors are waiting for land to open up as many GTA businesses look to move down the QEW corridor and escape gridlock, high taxes and a rising cost of living for employees.

The brownfields, meantime, the residue of an industry-rich 20th century, come with some time bombs. That is tainted land that must be cleansed, about 200 sites with potential as locations for various sized businesses.

It adds up to a small inventory of serviced land across the city and not enough in the right places, along major highways. That's causing some businesses to locate short of Hamilton, in Burlington, or to leapfrog the city entirely.

Another prescription, if critics could wave a magic wand, would be to declare a tax-free core zone that draws in new business. It has worked in U.S. cities (see accompanying story).

Hamilton already has ambitious programs of tax relief and interest-free loans to foster development. It is the education component of property taxes, about 40 per cent, that can't be waived under provincial legislation. Would Hamilton want to go as far as to seek special concessions on this tax?

The alternative to making bold moves in this city may be to stay a current course that seems prudent, if overly patient.

The trade-offs to that? It's considered by some to be a stand-still policy at a time when a race is on to bring in business and jobs at a pace faster than they are lost in traditional manufacturing.

Brantford: The comeback city
Brantford was buffeted by the same ill economic winds that battered Hamilton but has been rebounding thanks to two major factors.

The completion of Highway 403 to connect with Highway 401 positioned the city to attract industry wanting to import into the United States through Michigan.

And Brantford accelerated development of serviced land bordering Highway 403 with easy access to interchanges.

New business is aggressively targeted through Economic Development Brantford. Brant has a comprehensive website and an ambitious "food cluster" plan that looks to marry agriculture and industry.

The city's history paralleled Hamilton's in the sense it relied heavily on one sector, farm equipment, and reeled painfully when companies like Massey-Ferguson and White declined.

"It was survival," says John Frabotta, head of the economic development body. "I've seen the good, the very ugly and now a return of the good" in 19 years on the job.

Brantford benefited from tight budgeting though the 1990s which paid off the city debt in 1998.

The city then turned around and borrowed some more to speed servicing of land around a crucial Highway 403 interchange.

And when industries bought in, a good mixed pool of skilled and unskilled labour was at hand.

The effects of the 1980s plummet are still there in downtown Brantford, empty storefronts with sale or lease signs, but the new core rises near them thanks to a marriage of public and private interests.

A large civic square development is under way to provide a mix of affordable and upscale housing as well as public-sector and private business offices.

Burlington: Working as a team
Burlington set a policy in the 1970s that it did not want to be a bedroom community and pursued business aggressively.

To facilitate that, the non-profit Burlington Economic Development Corporation was created.

The 50-50 public-private economic body is composed of the major bodies serving business.

This Team Burlington includes the City of Burlington, Burlington Chamber of Commerce, Tourism Burlington, Burlington Downtown Business Association and Aldershot Business Community.

Together they form a one-stop shopping location, with adjacent offices, to serve enterprises already located in the city or interested in locating.

Executive director Don Baxter says the co-operative is unique to Canada and promotes ease of communication and execution in trying to foster economic growth.

Burlington benefits from the movement down the QEW from the Greater Toronto Area and the attraction of Hamilton's transportation nodes.

High taxes, cost of living and gridlock in Toronto make Burlington's open spaces and lifestyle attractive for a business and its workforce.

A big UPS facility and its 450 jobs recently located in Burlington wouldn't be there if not for John C. Munro Hamilton International Airport, Canada's largest air freight centre.

"Hamilton's day is coming," Baxter says, for the same reasons of population and cost-of-living pressures that saw Toronto-area businesses move to Burlington.

He believes in the theory that high tides lift all boats in an economic region.

Team Burlington does not see itself in competition with Hamilton, Baxter noted.

In his view, new businesses in either community will benefit the other as wealth is spread around the Bay area.

The U.S. model: Forging a new direction
The successful turnaround of former Pennsylvania towns Bethlehem and Allentown is founded in early recognition that the steel industry was fading.

Strong local business leadership, armed with that foresight, forged political consensus and will to drive change.

As early as 1958, executives with Bethlehem Steel were forging links with universities to study diversification for the Lehigh Valley area. A 130-day strike that year underscored vividly the risk of a one- industry economy.

So local investors, including Bethlehem Steel, developed one of the first industrial parks in North America, at a local airport.

The nonprofit Lehigh Valley Industrial Park sold the land, then bought and serviced another package of property.

Almost 50 years later there are six parks employing 17,000 people in the high-tech and health fields.

The Lehigh Valley Economic Development Corporation has promoted location and transportation, short swift runs to New York and Philadelphia, in some cases winning major employers such as Olympus.

The medical-imaging wing of the company moved from Long Island due to those factors, cost of living and lifestyle in the leafy east Pennsylvania region.

Allentown, dimly portrayed in the Billy Joel song, also revived the town-centre pulse with a tax-free zone.

Several businesses relocated from the suburbs with the promise of being spared city and state taxes for 10 years.

Meantime, a business incubator developed with Lehigh University was launched in 1983, stumbled early on, but then hit stride.

It nurtured companies such as OraSure Technologies, a medical testing company that grew from a handful of jobs to 2,400 today and grossed $69 million US in 2005.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 11:31 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304

Next Hamilton video link #2: Will students stay in Hamilton?

http://www.hamiltonspectator.com/vid...xtstudent.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 11:40 AM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
i still have to go back and read that piece, but I'm in no hurry to based on the bold titles - "Brantford, the Comeback City"??
Great...now the Spec is hoping we can become like Brantford?

Or Borington??

What a hack job...how about looking at real cities like Portland, Boston and Montreal for examples that we can follow....not goofy little hicktowns and boring suburbs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 1:19 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,677
I haven't been giving this series much attention because I already knew the Spec was pathetic, but now they suggest the sixth largest and one of the most urban cities in Canada should emulate Brantford and one of its own suburbs? This is symptomatic of Hamilton's problems with self image and inferiority.

Brantford's downtown is probably the most decayed in Canada. They have some new big box stores and new industry because they serviced many, many acres of nice flat farmland along the 403 and offer dirt cheap taxes. Their core continues to rot. That's the classic suburban sprawl development model that everyone supposedly wants to move away from.

Burlington, same thing along the QEW with the added benefit of population pressures from the expanding GTA. Burlington has mostly new infrastructure, a huge middle class tax base and not nearly as much social services burden as Hamilton. That's why they can afford to spruce up their waterfront and downtown. A big chunk of Hamilton's own middle and upper middle class has fled to the low taxes and shiny suburbia of Burlington, leaving Hamilton's battered working class to fend for themselves. Burlington and Hamilton are not really comparable but should rather be seen as a whole.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 1:20 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
It's because both Brantford and Burlington takes away potential jobs to Hamilton, especially Brantford.

Burlington took UPS, ridiculous that Burlington took UPS when UPS uses Hamilton Airport for the cargo business, and Brantford took a lot of biotech and probably will get the Maple Leaf factory.

We have to learn from these cities to compete against them so that Hamiltonians don't have to commute elsewhere for jobs. It's a serious issue that keeps getting worse each year.

Tax free zones does work. Working in Winnipeg and in many US cities.

But like the article said are we willing to keep taxes the same but expect less service so the city can focus on brownfield cleanup and servicing new land? Maybe when more jobs are disappearing and they'll be a bigger sense of urgency.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 2:54 PM
raisethehammer raisethehammer is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,054
I disagree on today's article on so many levels it's insane.
"let the city rot in order to pay for sprawl??" Crazy!

I will never vote for anyone singing this mantra. We've been doing it for decades and the results speak for themselves.
Where is this so-called "list of companies" waiting to get here??

Bob Bratina's campaign slogan is right on the money - "fix what we have".
McHattie's is also right on the money - "Neighbourhoods first".

Brantford is more like Hamilton than Burlington is. What can we learn from them?? Let your downtown rot and spend tax dollars luring companies to a highway?? wow. Great vision Spec.

This is one of the worst series they've ever done. Expect some serious backlash once this mess is over.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2007, 3:24 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,304
I don't understand how one can say by creating new business parks it equals to sprawl. In my book it isn't. Sprawl is housing projects. Business parks doesn't equate to sprawl.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:11 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.