Quote:
Originally Posted by allovertown
They may not like it if a tower replaced that bizzare mansion but the mansion isn't historically protected so this review process that sunk the tower at this location would be irrelevant no? Or does it still have to go through this review process simply by being located in society hill?
|
Depends if the district is designated historic, which I imagine it is. For example, the 262 South 16th condo needed approval from the Historical Commission even though the demolished building it is replacing wasn't historic because it sits within a historic district. I'd imagine there would be somewhat more leeway for a replacement building, though, and Standard 9 doesn't apply in the same way it would for an overbuild incorporating a designated building like the Nelson Building.