HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2010, 2:42 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,424
wouldn't an apple store fit well into strathcona?
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2010, 2:48 AM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
^Probably, like I said, there is probably enough potential customers in the area with that whole Apple/Starbucks hipster thing, although I'd hope Whyte Ave keep it's independent side, I don't think Jasper Ave will revitalize quick enough to keep the chains perhaps in a Downtown location instead. It could end up like Vancouver with Jasper becoming our Robson, the Warehouse district our Yaletown, and then Whyte our South Granville.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2010, 7:57 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 67,557
CMD et al - you have just proved my point with our 'priorities'... with that being typical suburban mall support. Other than Whyte, and even with whyte, we have voted with our dollar and continue to support a city that seems to want to continue to live with a mediocre downtown and very very few interesting walkable shopping districts.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2010, 8:12 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
This has nothing to do with "we" cold. People are not going to pack the downtown streets and wait for these stores to show up.

The issues like these downtown are not 'your' issues specifically. They are issues present in any neighborhood trying to re-invent itself.
__________________
Short term pain for long term gain
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2010, 10:37 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 67,557
^disagree. Stores go to where people are and it is very unfortunate where people tend to go and have experiences for retail these days.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2010, 11:12 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
^ That's my point. They went to Southgate because it's busy & likely to get a lot busier. I've never set foot in the place, but likely will now just because I can take the train there.

I'm saying that it's unfair to expect people to crowd the streets in order to drive more & better business. Just like it's unfair for me to expect that people should invest in my 'hood just to accelerate the Avenue revival... It's a process of enticement... a slow, slow process.
__________________
Short term pain for long term gain
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2010, 11:18 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 67,557
^Downtown is an embarrassment in many respects and we are simply not doing enough fast enough to correct it.

Being in MTL this past weekend reminded me how far we have to go in making it a place to go, be seen, and enjoy a warm day on a patio or strolling along shops.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2010, 11:22 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
Well Montreal did have a heck of a head start
__________________
Short term pain for long term gain
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2010, 11:24 PM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
Plus 3 more people for every 1 Edmontonian helps and a huge tourist base.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2010, 11:28 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 67,557
plus continued excuses excuses excuses
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2010, 11:34 PM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
you seriously think a city of one million can compete with a city of almost four? apples to oranges. especially one that has much more history and existing urbanity?

we can best compete with western cities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2010, 11:58 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 67,557
^you can choose what kind of city you want to live in, you can choose where you shop, you can choose what kind of experience you want, you can you can you can.

and please, for christ's sake, don't take the attitude of let's just deal with fact that we are something and cannot be more!
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2010, 12:00 AM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
Edmonton certainly can be more than it currently is, I agree with you there. But presently, it will not be a Montreal. It could be a Portland or a Denver or a Vancouver or maybe a San Diego, but Montreal, one of the greatest urban destinations in North America, hell no.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2010, 12:01 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 67,557
let me make this a little clearer


EDMONTON DOES NOT HAVE TO BE ANYTHING OTHER THAN EDMONTON, BUT WHAT DOES EDMONTON WANT TO BE?

right now it ain't pretty
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2010, 12:03 AM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
^It could be LIKE Portland, Denver, Vancouver or San Diego in terms of urban appeal, transit usage, urban mentality, urban revitalization, pedestrian activity, etc. Not an exact clone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2010, 12:54 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 67,557
dude, my point is being missed... it could be but still is not doing enough to be more urban.

perhaps it simply does not want to be

seems like it more and more
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2010, 1:50 AM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 11,934
^The reality is that the majority of Edmonton's growth occured post war which was dominated by automobile-centric design and built form. Montreal's growth occured throughout many era's pre-automobile. This is why a large part of its built form is designed for the pedestrian / horse and cart. Only a small portion of Edmonton was designed like this and unfortunately, much of it was demolished to make way for post modern automobile-oriented design. A lot of wonderful buildings were demolished in Montreal too, but there was so much of this build form, that a lot has remained intact.

This doesn't mean that Edmonton can't reconnect to its urban roots. I think it is, but this isn't something that happens overnight.

So comparing Edmonton to Montreal is weak given that there are many differences between both cities beyond population.
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2010, 2:04 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,815
Let's wait until the new $400 million drugstore opens up, then we'll see what kind of foot traffic downtown Edmonton gets.

In the meantime, one can always contact an Apple rep to ask why downtown Edmonton or Old Strathcona/U of A doesn't have an Apple store.

List of locations in Canada:
http://www.apple.com/ca/retail/storelist/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2010, 2:18 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 67,557
^ESQ actually has an apple store for those interested.

CMD - i am but using MTL as reference not example so much.

I am not convinced Edmonton wants to make smart urban decisions or become an urban centre.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2010, 2:23 AM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
^What about all the LRT construction, approvals, and proposals? That's a pretty smart move. We have so much on the plate now with LRT it's exciting. I mean NLRT is just a small amount of funding away from going fully ahead, Gorman is funding away too, and it looks like the WLRT-SELRT line looks also pretty much just waiting for the money to show up (although I could be wrong, and there could be still lots to get through). Transit is really starting to become viable of an option for a larger amount of people now. I mean we just hooked up the LRT to a major destination, Southgate! This will bring lots of people onto the LRT as it is a major place people go at all sorts of times, not just for games or concerts or when school is in session.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:27 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.