HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 3:46 PM
hilman's Avatar
hilman hilman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,763
^ Zing!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 4:03 PM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,759
There are bad drivers everywhere.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 4:07 PM
Xelebes's Avatar
Xelebes Xelebes is offline
Sawmill Billowtoker
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rockin' in Edmonton
Posts: 13,964
Most drivers are inadequate drivers. Including ourselves.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 4:10 PM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,486
^ Not me! I bike.

...though I guess technically speaking that makes me an inadequate driver...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 4:45 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,348
As a lifer in YEG with a short stint in TO for NASCAR driver training (401). I have noticed a steady drop in the quality of driving habits. And this crosses over to the cycling side as well.

The drop has been steady since the eradication of Provincial Drivers tests and a move to private firms administering the tests. You now get license mills and it shows.

But we do have a lot of people that have moved here from other jurisdictions and they brought their driving habits here.

I hope that Alberta moves in the same direction as BC and starts enforcing the left lane rule. The signage in BC is quite noticeable. Let Others Pass. I think we need signs on all the major highways that say Left Lane For Passing Only.
And let’s hope that the New government will become Proactive and not reactive with regard to highway/freeway construction.
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2016, 6:58 PM
Kokkei Mizu's Avatar
Kokkei Mizu Kokkei Mizu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 447
Calgary Trail:

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2016, 2:19 PM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2016, 2:39 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 67,557
Those are actually very interesting from an engineering perspective and design aesthetic.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2016, 8:55 PM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acey View Post
Cool shot - you were on the river in what?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2016, 9:10 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 67,557
You can get right down on the river there as the road passes under to Ft. Ed.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2016, 10:13 PM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
You can get right down on the river there as the road passes under to Ft. Ed.
Yep, this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2016, 10:23 PM
Mikemike Mikemike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Those are actually very interesting from an engineering perspective and design aesthetic.
Maybe, but it was way more graceful before.

There's actually a photo of that bridge in a National Geographic book about construction ("Builders", I think) that my parents have. Looked way better before.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2016, 12:24 AM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just a standard bridge, I don't see anything particularly aesthetic about it in either form. The extensions are a great bit of engineering though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2016, 1:18 AM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acey View Post
Just a standard bridge, I don't see anything particularly aesthetic about it in either form. The extensions are a great bit of engineering though.
I think the braces are simplistic and an obvious solution for weight bearing. They are a brutal design that only a structural engineer would appreciate and no doubt "designed". Had an architect been tasked to provide the design they would have been more elegant and refined...albeit at 3 times the cost.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2016, 4:38 AM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
“This approach would allow us to widen the bridge without going down into the river channel, which would have been a significant undertaking given today’s strict environmental requirements as well as other risk factors,” Kriviak says. “There would be habitat disturbance considerations, navigation constraints, seasonal and in-channel access constraints, fluctuating water levels to deal with – all of which would have almost certainly resulted in higher cost and a potentially longer construction schedule.”

Extending the pier caps was not without technical design and installation challenges. Selecting structural steel as a primary component of the extensions turned out to be a key factor in addressing the challenges, Kriviak says. “Selective use of steel was key in meeting a fundamental requirement of this project. Concrete extensions would have led to excessive additional weight on the structure. Also, placement of major concrete formwork above the river would have been a difficult process and might have resulted in the complicating requirement of temporary impact on the river channel.”
http://www.cisc-icca.ca/projects/alb...ridge-widening
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2016, 4:19 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,815
About 2 hours south of Edmonton but on a popular road for Edmontonians - QE2/Gaetz Ave interchange rework starts later this month:
http://www.hwy2gaetz.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2016, 4:34 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
That's really interesting about that bridge! Down in Calgary there is investigation being done into widening Crowchild across the Bow. I didn't know how feasible it was, but I imagine a similar technique would be used there and it's good that we have such a similar project in the province.

And I think those struts are beautiful. They are as simple as they can be, but no simpler - and you can see exactly how they work. No aesthetic fluff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2016, 6:06 AM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'll post this list here too, compiled it last week. I've extrapolated a bunch of numbers but I believe the order to be correct.

10 Busiest Major Routes in Alberta, 2015 (AADT)

1. Deerfoot @ Memorial = 170,070
2. Glenmore Causeway = ~150,000
3. Quesnell Bridge (Whitemud) = ~113,000
4. Henday NW @ Yellowhead = 105,370
5. QE2 @ Ellerslie = 99,210
6. Macleod Tr over Fish Creek = ~93,000
7. Crowchild @ Shag = ~92,000
8. Memorial @ Deerfoot = ~90,000
9. Yellowhead @ Fort Rd = ~75,000
10. Stoney @ Beddington = 72,940

Source 1, 2, 3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2016, 4:39 PM
EdmontonTraveller EdmontonTraveller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 50
^ Notable non-YEG/YYC routes
12. Fort Mac Bridge ~62,000
13. Red Deer Highway 2 & 32 St ~60,000

Also Highway 2 @ Airdrie 90,000 (110,000 @ Crossiron Mall), just 45,000 N of Airdrie
Also Highway 2 @ Nisku 95,000, just 34,000 S of Leduc

97th St. @ Yellowhead beats out Beddington Trail & 170 Street, for 14th and #1 surface street in Alberta.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2016, 9:16 PM
Acey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdmontonTraveller View Post
97th St. @ Yellowhead beats out Beddington Trail & 170 Street, for 14th and #1 surface street in Alberta.
What numbers are you looking at for 97 St? Cause the highest I see is 59k weekday, therefore...

14 St SW @ Glenmore, Calgary = 85,000
97 St @ Yellowhead, Edmonton = 59,000
16 Ave NE @ Centre St, Calgary = 50,000

From there it depends what you want to call a surface street. And Beddington @ Beddington Blvd is 56k. 170th is probably a bit over 50k now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.