HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2011, 2:16 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2011, 5:33 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
modified version recommended for approval by PEC
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Lo...717/story.html

Quote:
The committee approved a motion, presented by Harder, that would see some of the money the city would normally collect from the developer for neighbourhood parkland improvements instead put into an account to help residents who have lived in their homes for more than 20 years “find alternative accommodation.”
...................
The committee also approved a motion from Harder that amended earlier plans and dropped the allowable height along the majority of Bruyère Street from 16.5 metres to 14.5 metres, which is the amount permitted under current zoning. It also lowered the height of a small area on St. Andrew Street from 14.5 metres to 12.5 metres and increased setbacks along Bruyère.

Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Lo...#ixzz1VAQ7JBSO
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2011, 10:01 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 23,866
It will be interesting to see how the modified version compares to the rendering above. Dropping the allowable height by two metres in a couple of spots seems pretty trivial.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2011, 11:41 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
It will be interesting to see how the modified version compares to the rendering above. Dropping the allowable height by two metres in a couple of spots seems pretty trivial.
But it dropped it down below the magical child-killing, traffic-inducing, property-value-reducing threshold, and that's all that counts!

It's sad to see the old row-houses go, but I wonder: why don't more such rowhouses, or modern versions modelled on them, get build in the burbs, in place of the total crap that the unimaginitive builders in Ottawa keep throwing up? If you're going to build semidetached or rows in the burbs anyway, why not give them a bit of 1920s cachet?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2011, 1:45 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2011, 1:29 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterloowarrior View Post
really? as in
q: "where's your new place? Downtown?"
a: "yeah, Waterstreet. in Lowertown."
q: "there's a Waterstreet in Lowertown?"
a: "yeah, it's on Bruyère St."
q: "Waterstreet's on Bruyère St?"
a: "yeah."

..... Abbott, Costello and Python sketch ensues
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2011, 4:08 AM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,244
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2011, 1:58 PM
S-Man S-Man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,639
Quote:
Abbott, Costello and Python sketch ensues
Too true!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2011, 12:38 AM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 23,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by McC View Post
really? as in
q: "where's your new place? Downtown?"
a: "yeah, Waterstreet. in Lowertown."
q: "there's a Waterstreet in Lowertown?"
a: "yeah, it's on Bruyère St."
q: "Waterstreet's on Bruyère St?"
a: "yeah."

..... Abbott, Costello and Python sketch ensues
Watergate was already taken.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2011, 3:38 PM
S-Man S-Man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,639
Waterboard?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2011, 1:23 PM
Ottawan Ottawan is offline
Citizen-at-large
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Expat (in Toronto)
Posts: 738
I was surprised when I read this on Spacing Ottawa today in a post about Bruyere Street, but it seems that there might be a bit of sense and history to the name of this condo after all:

Quote:
The Bruyere Continuing Care residence did not go through notable changes. However, the building south of Bruyere as well as a few houses have been replaced by the Kuwait Ambassy. Please note that Bruyere Street was then called Water Street
http://spacingottawa.ca/2011/11/11/m...ers-1940-2011/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2011, 2:26 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ottawan View Post
I was surprised when I read this on Spacing Ottawa today in a post about Bruyere Street, but it seems that there might be a bit of sense and history to the name of this condo after all:



http://spacingottawa.ca/2011/11/11/m...ers-1940-2011/
saw that too, it's interesting, but still begs the question for me... e.g., would you ever call a building on Laurier Ave W "Maria St"? it just seems weird, and not because of the anachronism (I like naming things with some thought to history, FWIW), but because of using "street", but a different street, in the name.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2011, 2:41 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by McC View Post
e.g., would you ever call a building on Laurier Ave W "Maria St"?
that said, THE Maria (or The Theodore) would have been a great name for the apartments at Laurier and Waller, instead of just the boring address.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2012, 10:58 PM
reidjr reidjr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,237
Is there any update on this project?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2012, 3:39 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,453
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2013, 5:59 PM
KyMc KyMc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by reidjr View Post
Only in ottawa would people get worked up over a 8 story building.
I also think it's unfortunate that people would object to a development that will bring so much to the neighborhood. Judging by the looks of the building (see: http://claridgecondos.com/waterstreet/), Claridge has put a lot of planning into the exteriors (and interiors) of this building... they look new-age and aesthetically pleasing. Let's just say it's not going to be an eyesore. I'm enthusiastic about the development
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2013, 6:48 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
Lots of <3 for Claridge today

Quote:
Originally Posted by KyMc View Post
I'm enthusiastic about the development
you don't say?

Three makes a trend; created a new thread for the phenomenon here http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...51#post6046451
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2013, 2:37 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,579
The site:


And on Streetview:
http://goo.gl/maps/OmoNa
http://goo.gl/maps/B9X3r
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2013, 2:40 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,579
Doomed Lowertown homes not free for the taking, says Claridge

By Laura ARMSTRONG, OTTAWA CITIZEN September 10, 2013 6:01 PM


OTTAWA — Four century-old workers cottages in Lowertown set to be demolished in October to make room for a new development are not being offered for free to anyone with the means to move them, according to site developer Claridge Homes.

Shawn Malhotra, one of the developer’s vice presidents, said he is confused by reports saying anyone can claim the historic cottages as long as they have the money, time and equipment to move the buildings from their current location near Bruyère Street and King Edward Avenue.

Malhotra said he spoke with Lowertown Community Association acting president Marc Aubin about moving one of the cottages a year or two ago, during the approval phase for the incoming five-story, 101-unit WaterStreet development.

“When we were going through our site plan with the city, we obviously spoke to the Lowertown Community Association and we had one of the members there, who does quite a bit of work with the heritage committee, ask if he was able to put together something to move one of the houses, would we let him? I said yes, but I said obviously there’s a timeline on it and you’ve got to give me an answer,” said Malhotra.

A post on Heritage Ottawa’s website that says Claridge Homes has offered up all of the four building for free is misconstrued, said Malhotra. Heritage Ottawa’s president Leslie Maitland said the organization was helping the Lowertown Community Association by sharing the post on their website, but had no involvement with Claridge Homes. Maitland said if the information was wrong, it would be removed from their website.

Calls and emails for comment from the Lowertown Community Association were not immediately returned.

Being open to the possibility of moving one of the cottages was a way to help the Lowertown Community Association out, said Malhotra. He said he would speak to someone from the public if they were to approach him about moving one of the cottages with their own time and on their own dollar but Claridge is not going out of their way to promote the fact that they’re discussing the option with Aubin.

“It’s not available to the public, per se, we’re just trying to help the Lowertown Community Association out.”

A total of 20 rental units are scheduled to be demolished beginning Oct. 1 to make room for WaterStreet, Claridge’s T-shaped, five-storey building on Bruyère Street just east of Rose Street.

Residents and neighbours objected to the plan, saying tenants — some of them elderly, lifelong residents — would have trouble finding other affordable housing. There were also concerns about the size of the project.

The tenants living in the existing units are scheduled to be out by October, Malhotra said, at which time Claridge will either go through demolition or a moving process. Excavation will begin in November, he said.

Malhotra said one of the four cottages might be moved, although he didn’t know which one. Logistically, he said, it’s a lot of work to move houses and the Lowertown Community Association would have to find somewhere to put the building

“It’s not as easy as just picking up a house and moving it. If somebody was to call we would talk to them but in general it’s probably not going to happen.”

With files from Meghan Hurley
© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen







http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/ot...811/story.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2013, 2:55 AM
kevinbottawa kevinbottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,229
Surprised they got enough sales to start building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:38 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.