HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3921  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2015, 8:01 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by niwell View Post
Didn't most of the traffic issues on the Queensway stem from the inadequate ramp setup? Particularly in the downtown area and headed westwards. Most of the ramps were short and terminate at lights on surface streets. IIRC there has been some new construction to correct this but I could be wrong.

All I know is last time I drove to Ottawa (first time in 7 years) I was shocked at how quick the Queensway section from the 416 to downtown seemed.
Yep, most of the problems stem from merging issues due to ramp design. Much of that is being improved with realignments and reconfigurations.

"Congestion" in Ottawa is fairly tame. Even peak period congestion probably wouldn't seem that bad to someone used to driving in Toronto. Outside of peak hours, congestion is basically non existent except for events at the CTC arena. This will likely be rectified if the Sens move downtown, as they're now planning.
     
     
  #3922  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2015, 8:03 PM
Franco401 Franco401 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Fredericton
Posts: 1,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by manny_santos View Post
The Ontario government has awarded the contract for the next phase of Highway 407 east to Highway 35/115, as well as Highway 418. The winner is Blackbird Infrastructure.
Perfect. Hopefully they can upgrade the 115 to a full freeway, not a RI/RO, the rest of the way to Peterborough.
     
     
  #3923  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2015, 8:08 PM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 5,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco401 View Post
Perfect. Hopefully they can upgrade the 115 to a full freeway, not a RI/RO, the rest of the way to Peterborough.
Technically, north of where the 407 will link to 115, there's only a short stretch of RIRO highway up to where Highway 35 departs towards Lindsay. The rest of 115 to Peterborough is built to full freeway standard.

I suspect these two highways, once open, will decrease traffic on 35/115 between the 401 and future 407. I would not be surprised to see 115 upgraded between future 407 and 35 to full freeway standard.
     
     
  #3924  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 3:04 PM
Horus's Avatar
Horus Horus is offline
I ask because I Gatineau
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Aylmer (by way of GTA)
Posts: 1,213
Press Release from MTO on the 407 East extension

http://news.ontario.ca/mto/en/2015/04/moving-forward-on-highway-407-east-1.html

Of note (emphasis mine):
Quote:
The province will also set and regulate tolls, and use toll revenue to fund new infrastructure and transit projects across Ontario.

Construction is expected to begin in fall 2015 from Harmony Road to Taunton Road/Highway 418 and is scheduled for completion in December 2017. The remainder will open in 2020.

This is the final phase of the Highway 407 East project, which will:

Extend Highway 407 eastward from Harmony Road in Oshawa to Highway 35/115
Provide a new north-south 10-kilometre highway link, Highway 418, to connect Highway 407 to Highway 401, just east of Oshawa
Provide eight new interchanges including a partial interchange at Highway 418 and Taunton Road and three freeway to freeway connections (Highway 407 and Highway 418; Highway 418 and Highway 401; and at the end of Highway 407 at Highway 35/115)
     
     
  #3925  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 3:17 PM
niwell's Avatar
niwell niwell is offline
sick transit, gloria
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Roncesvalles, Toronto
Posts: 11,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by manny_santos View Post

I suspect these two highways, once open, will decrease traffic on 35/115 between the 401 and future 407. I would not be surprised to see 115 upgraded between future 407 and 35 to full freeway standard.

I imagine it would. I also can't see MTO upgrading the portion between the 401 and future 407. It would require a level of expropriation that doesn't really justify the expanded capacity. There are lots of businesses and residents that more or less front the highway.
     
     
  #3926  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 3:42 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
Don't see a point unless you go all the way to 35/115 split as it's only a few kilometres between the 401 and 407, no? Agreed that straightening out the highway is not worth the effort.
     
     
  #3927  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 4:28 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by niwell View Post
I imagine it would. I also can't see MTO upgrading the portion between the 401 and future 407. It would require a level of expropriation that doesn't really justify the expanded capacity. There are lots of businesses and residents that more or less front the highway.
MTO is planning to upgrade the highway 11 RIRO to a full freeway eventually, and are slowly expropriating businesses for it. 11 south of Orillia will need to be widened to 6 lanes soon, which means upgrades to a freeway.

I don't think they have the same plans for 35 as its traffic levels are much lower and are experiencing much slower growth than 11 is. I do know MTO wants to expand the RIRO up to Lindsay on 35 eventually.
     
     
  #3928  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 8:24 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
How is the toll revenue working on the 407 extension and on the 412 & 418?

Will the province use the money to pay back construction costs? Or will it be added as another source for general revenue, or committed to the transit fund?

What will the rates be like? I've heard that the province will use the existing ETR mechanism to collect the revenues, but will they be as high? 407ETR tolls are very steep. They have to be in order to keep traffic moving, but this far east where volumes will be much lower tolls will have to be lower.
     
     
  #3929  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 8:39 PM
Horus's Avatar
Horus Horus is offline
I ask because I Gatineau
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Aylmer (by way of GTA)
Posts: 1,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
How is the toll revenue working on the 407 extension and on the 412 & 418?

Will the province use the money to pay back construction costs? Or will it be added as another source for general revenue, or committed to the transit fund?

What will the rates be like? I've heard that the province will use the existing ETR mechanism to collect the revenues, but will they be as high? 407ETR tolls are very steep. They have to be in order to keep traffic moving, but this far east where volumes will be much lower tolls will have to be lower.
This Toronto Star article indicates that tolls would be lower on the new sections (at least the 418 - no mention of 412) but that billing would be handled by 407ETR, just separately itemized.
     
     
  #3930  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 9:03 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,831
I'm expecting tolls to be in the range of $0.20 / km during peak hours from the 418 to the existing 407, and $0.10 from the 418 to 35.

or at least something roughly like that.
     
     
  #3931  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2015, 12:56 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,797
I am curious what (if any) effect that the selection of a new contractor will have on the final design and construction of the Phase 2 of the 407.

The primary constructor as part of this contract is Holcim, which owns Dufferin Construction. Dufferin is one of the largest highway builders in Ontario. Dufferin doesn't appear to have any significant local capacity for asphalt or concrete production in the eastern GTA, so it is unclear to me if the road will end up being constructed in asphalt or concrete. During the construction of the 404, the Miller Group built a temporary concrete batching plant in what has become the Queensville Carpool lot in order to pave the highway. It would make sense for Dufferin to build some sort of temporary plant during highway construction as well.

For the first phase of the 407 extension, basically all of the structures are being completed using pre-cast concrete I-beams. Dufferin has extensive construction experience building the long-span cast in place structures that typically are constructed for large freeway to freeway interchanges in Ontario. In fact, the two cast in place structures that are being built as part of the first phase of the 407 to carry Hwy 7 overtop of the 407 extension are / were constructed by Dufferin.

The other factor that I see as different for the second phase of the highway extension is the longer timeline for construction. Construction commenced in the fall of 2013 for the first phase of construction, leaving two years two construct something like 35km of new four and six lane highway, including a major realignment of Highway 401 and two new freeway to freeway interchanges. In contrast, only about 10km of the second phase of construction will open by 2017, with only half of one freeway to freeway interchange needing to be constructed initially. The longer time frame could mean different construction techniques, and perhaps less of a reliance on concrete i-beam style bridges at grade separations.

Of course, all that said, this is just my speculation, which could be proven entirely meaningless and wrong once construction is underway. As a resident of Durham Region, I am looking forward to watching the construction progress as it moves forward.
     
     
  #3932  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2015, 11:56 AM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,930
Route 117 - Sainte-Agate-des-Monts — Mont-Tremblant

Video Link
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 050 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
     
     
  #3933  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2015, 12:46 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Touching grass everyday.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 51,069
^great video, and perfect song for the accompaniment.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
     
     
  #3934  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2015, 10:04 PM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,930
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport View Post
^great video, and perfect song for the accompaniment.
Yes indeed !
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 050 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
     
     
  #3935  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2015, 11:19 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,797
117 is a great road to drive. I was disappointed to see the roundabouts constructed in Mont-Tremblent though, I was hoping the traffic signals would have eventually been replaced with interchanges.
     
     
  #3936  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2015, 1:13 AM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,930
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonysnob View Post
117 is a great road to drive. I was disappointed to see the roundabouts constructed in Mont-Tremblent though, I was hoping the traffic signals would have eventually been replaced with interchanges.
They did a little further north near Rivière-Rouge and Labelle

https://www.google.ca/maps/@46.405977,-7...3m4!1e1!3m2!1svFS3iPv2c-SosG1L2MFQFA!2e0
https://www.google.ca/maps/@46.27597,-74...3m4!1e1!3m2!1sSZ4SjmZZGDecUx_upAc5Ag!2e0

I personally don't care because I really like Roundabouts.
Btw, it's Mont-Tremblant.
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 050 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
     
     
  #3937  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2015, 11:11 AM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,266
Time zone sign on the Trans Labrador Highway.

Trans Labrador Highway by dodi Raz, on Flickr

I imagine the highway itself could eventually change this. The only reason that portion of southern Labrador is on Newfoundland Time is because, until recently, it wasn't connected to the rest of Labrador. It's still a long way of wilderness off... but they can drive there now so they might form stronger connections with Labrador's interior than Newfoundland's Great Northern Peninsula and, if they do, it could make sense to have the time zone's clean break be the Strait of Belle Isle.

I still find it hilarious that the French islands of St-Pierre et Miquelon (just to the left of the boot-shaped peninsula off the central bottom of Newfoundland) are 30 minutes further ahead of us. So, going from HFX and heading east you get:

HFX: 9 a.m.
Port-aux-Basques, NL: 9:30 a.m.
Cartwright, NL: 9 a.m.
SPM: 10 a.m.
STJs: 9:30 a.m.
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."

Last edited by SignalHillHiker; Apr 11, 2015 at 2:32 PM.
     
     
  #3938  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2015, 12:56 PM
ghYHZ ghYHZ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Antigonish NS
Posts: 496
Quote:
Originally Posted by le calmar View Post
So in other words, during cold winters getting in or out of Nfld overland can be pratically impossible? The ferry service to North Sydney is seasonal if I remember well, and the only other option can be be very problematic when the strait is frozen over.
The North Sydney to Port-aux-Basques service is constitutionally protected year ‘round and I guess could be considered an extension of the Trans Canada Highway. There’s usually two crossings per day each way at 1145 and 2345. Only the service to Argentia NL is seasonal.

These are large 500 vehicle ferries rated “Northern Baltic Class 1A” and quite capable of handling most ice conditions but in March this year because of the heavy ice conditions we experienced….they’ve needed some help from the Coast Guard Ice Breakers. I cross a couple of times each winter and thankfully things are now getting back to normal.









Even the C.T.M.A. Ferry "Vacancier" from the Iles-de-le-Madeleine, Quebec was diverted to Marine Atlantic terminal in North Sydney because of the heavy ice on its usual route to Prince Edward Island. Once off the ferry.......most of these passengers if they were heading west would have an extra 230km drive added to their journey.







And there’s an interesting contrast between the east and west coasts: The Marine Atlantic and CTMA Ferry route that were fighting the extreme ice conditions this year are south of the 49 th parallel (which is the US-Canada border across the west) and all are further south than any route that BC Ferries operates.

I’ve been on winter crossings to Newfoundland. Most make the run in the schedule 6 or 7 hours but I can remember a couple: a 15 hour detour to avoid the ice and 36 hours riding out a storm. Just make sure you get a cabin in winter…..a lot more comfortable than sitting up in coach if you do get stuck and they’ll keep you well fed (but there’s no complementary bar!!)





     
     
  #3939  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2015, 7:34 PM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 5,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker View Post
Time zone sign on the Trans Labrador Highway.

Trans Labrador Highway by dodi Raz, on Flickr

I imagine the highway itself could eventually change this. The only reason that portion of southern Labrador is on Newfoundland Time is because, until recently, it wasn't connected to the rest of Labrador. It's still a long way of wilderness off... but they can drive there now so they might form stronger connections with Labrador's interior than Newfoundland's Great Northern Peninsula and, if they do, it could make sense to have the time zone's clean break be the Strait of Belle Isle.

I still find it hilarious that the French islands of St-Pierre et Miquelon (just to the left of the boot-shaped peninsula off the central bottom of Newfoundland) are 30 minutes further ahead of us. So, going from HFX and heading east you get:

HFX: 9 a.m.
Port-aux-Basques, NL: 9:30 a.m.
Cartwright, NL: 9 a.m.
SPM: 10 a.m.
STJs: 9:30 a.m.
You learn something new every day - I didn't realize any of Labrador was on Newfoundland time. I think CBC promotes their regional programming as "3:30, 3:00 in Labrador".
     
     
  #3940  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2015, 1:17 AM
eemy's Avatar
eemy eemy is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,425
The CTMA Vacancier diverting to North Sydney raises the question of whether the ferry docks are standardized so that most ferries can use any given ferry dock, or if they are specially constructed for each ferry and CTMA Vacancier simply has one built in North Sydney for precisely these situations.

I used to think they must be specially constructed, but it seems unlikely to me that they would have a backup dock in North Sydney. Anyone have any insight?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:53 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.