Quote:
Originally Posted by relnahe
What a joke! It cost taxpayers in America 100 BILLION dollars a year for these corporate "subsidies". It would be more cost productive to just eliminate all business taxes in this country than it would to continue this.
|
It's not a joke at all. This is 26 million per year in
tax subsidies/tax breaks, meaning the company will realize a tax exemption of up to $26 million per year. The state is not losing
any money from this deal over a 35-year period (required by law) - it is simply telling Holtec that NJ will not
gain any money from the deal. In fact, NJ will make money in the form of wage tax, consumption tax and other ancillary taxes from the employees working in Camden - not to mention the lunch and other amenities that will realize new business from this site.
We do not have a homogenous tax structure in the 50 states. Business will go to the path of least resistance (lower taxes), just like you will buy the cheaper loaf of bread at the market if both choices are of same quality. No difference. If state tax regimes were cartelized, that would be a different story. NJ is simply trying to compete with the likes of the South, who almost took Holtec from the Northeast.
It is, however, unfortunate that NJ and PA have to pick and choose who gets tax breaks. Why should one large company with ties to government (cronyism) be afforded these tax breaks, while other smaller companies must pay the high-tax rates that forced the State to doll out these breaks in the first place? Why not just lower taxes across the board? Why not take the aggregate amount of tax breaks Harrisburg cherry-picks every year, and use that number to spread it out across the state, lowering taxes for everyone?