HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3861  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2009, 11:24 AM
econgrad econgrad is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 795
Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 2:44pm PST | Modified: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 1:01pm
City Council OKs purchase of Hotel Berry
Sacramento Business Journal - by Michael Shaw Staff writer
View Larger

The Sacramento City Council approved the purchase of the decrepit Hotel Berry, a move that includes the relocation of all its residents and closing the building.

The city already invested $5 million in a plan to have nonprofit corporations rehabilitate the apartment building, which dates to 1929. But a $21 million rehab effort that was supposed to be largely funded by selling federal tax credits last year was stymied by the economy and the lack of demand for the credits.

The nonprofit owner, Trinity Housing Foundation, agreed to sell the building to the city for $1 because it and the developer cannot afford the upkeep. The six-story Hotel Berry is about 50 percent vacant.

Relocating residents, operating costs, and paying off outstanding debt is estimated to cost $2.3 million. The city transfered money from other housing accounts dedicated to providing single-room occupancy housing to cover that cost.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3862  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2009, 11:27 AM
econgrad econgrad is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 795
Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 2:39pm PST
Jones: Funding likely for new Sacramento courthouse
Sacramento Business Journal - by Michael Shaw Staff writer

Assemblyman Dave Jones, a Democrat from Sacramento, on Wednesday announced funding will likely be available for design and site acquisition for a new criminal courthouse in Sacramento. The existing Gordon D. Schaber courthouse is overcrowded and unsafe, he said, and is second in line on a statewide list of facilities that need updating or expanding.

An entirely new courthouse is expected to cost about $500 million.

Under legislation he co-authored, the state can issue up to $5 billion in revenue bonds to pay for new courthouses. He said he expects revenue bonds will be more attractive to investors than general obligation bonds, which the state has had trouble selling due to the earlier budget crisis. The revenue bonds are paid back through court fines and fees.

Jones and other leaders also announced that transfer agreements have been negotiated for 466 court facilities statewide between county authorities and the state. The state is taking over the court system to enact needed improvements. Maintenance costs will now fall to the state as well.

“Our courthouses are in a state of disrepair,” Jones said. “With the completion of agreements to transfer court facilities from counties to the state, state-funded improvements can finally begin.”

Jones is chairman of the Judiciary Committee.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3863  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2009, 5:15 PM
daverave daverave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
The courthouse definitely needs to be replaced as it was built, as anyone who has been there can attest, well before security became such an overarching concern AND before energy use/waste became another critical design issue. I've sat in courtrooms there (as a juror and witness, not a defendant!) and was amazed at the visible gaps to the outside that exist above doors behind the witness stands. Talk about your energy sieve. However, other than over-the-top concerns about "terrists", I have no idea why the price tag would be that high. There's probably going to be a ridiculous amount of expensive parking garage provided for it, although in this case I could see some of the justification.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3864  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2009, 5:17 PM
daverave daverave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by econgrad View Post
An entirely new courthouse is expected to cost about $500 million.

Under legislation he co-authored, the state can issue up to $5 billion in revenue bonds to pay for new courthouses.
Jones and other leaders also announced that transfer agreements have been negotiated for 466 court facilities statewide between county authorities and the state.
There goes 10% of the $5 billion on the first courthouse! Just 465 to go!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3865  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2009, 12:30 AM
LandofFrost's Avatar
LandofFrost LandofFrost is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 195
A new court house is a terrible waste of money. Why can't we build civic buildings that last more than a few decades? Seriously, just build one that we don't have to replace for a few hundred years, like they do in europe.

Also instead of tearing that building down, couldn't we just repair it? Refurbish it?.... I'm guessing that would cost somewhat less then $500,000,000.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3866  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2009, 2:24 AM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,411
yeah, there isn't much sense in "green building" when construction waste (and demolition debris) are such a huge percentage of the stuff going into landfills. If the doors have air gaps, it's typically a hell of a lot cheaper to fix the air gaps than to replace the entire building. The greenest building, after all, is one that is already built.

The issue of capacity is a bigger problem: due to the explosive growth of western cities, facilities that were perfectly adequate 40-50 years ago are now far too small for the cities they serve. Sacramento's municipal answer (building a new City Hall behind the historic City Hall, expansion of state offices into a nearby campus of buildings) has worked pretty well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3867  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2009, 5:42 AM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,088
Swanston Station Transit Village

The proposed Swanston Station Transit Village is a long-range urban design
that would guide public and private improvements in the Swanston Station
Transit Village Specific Plan area. Encompassing roughly a ½ mile radius
around the Swanston Light Rail Station, the plan includes mixed use land
that promotes a mixture of office, commercial, open space, and medium and
high-density residential uses with 36 units per acre.



The Long-Term Plan includes approximately 213 acres of the Swanston
project area and would result in approximately 2,596 new dwelling units and
505,515 sf of new commercial space. The project could increase the
population within the City by up to 6,670 residents at buildout in 2030.

Last week a Draft Environmental Impact Report was submitted to the City for review.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3868  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2009, 5:02 PM
brandon12 brandon12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 998
$500M for a courthouse? I'm sorry, but there is NO way I can be supportive of that, even in my hometown. That is simply ridiculous. This country is going to hell quicker than I thought if that price seems reasonable to people. Give me a fucking break. $500M...

Google "Ron Paul"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3869  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2009, 5:43 PM
wburg's Avatar
wburg wburg is offline
Hindrance to Development
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,411
whoa, the Swanston plan involves finally straightening out the curve around the Lumberjack parking lot? It's about time...originally the Light Rail segment from Arden to Swanston was part of Sacramento Northern's "Swanston Branch" (it provided streetcar service there 80 years ago!) and the line ran through what is now the Lumberjack lot...but between the point when SN abandoned the right-of-way and Light Rail was built, the Lumberjack owners paved right over the rails to make a parking lot. So RT, rather than sue for the return of their ROW, ran the line around Lumberjack.

And I'm still hoping that a streetcar line can be included from this new Swanston transit station to the new arena/Cal Expo complex. It would also link residents of this new infill development directly with Kaiser, Arden Fair mall, and other office and retail spots up Arden...given my druthers, run it up Arden and down Expo, turning at Hurley or Howe, with a spur at the arena for "pulse" traffic. It would mitigate a lot of transportation problems and be handy for just about anyone visiting the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3870  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2009, 4:27 AM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,088


As reported in this weeks SBJ, the condo project at 16th and H has been
foreclosed on and Thunder Valley has been reduced in size from 23 to 15 floors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3871  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2009, 6:17 AM
ltsmotorsport's Avatar
ltsmotorsport ltsmotorsport is offline
Here we stAy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Parkway Pauper
Posts: 7,758
I forget, is that condo project already built?
__________________
Riding out the crazy train
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3872  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2009, 11:14 PM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,088
Yeah, it was finished last summer. At first they sold the units as condos
then in the fall they were turned into rentals.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3873  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2009, 6:13 AM
Phillip Phillip is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 562
Crown Books is moving into the North Natomas location where Borders was located until January. I saw a Crown Books banner outside today and they were wheeling in merchandise. That was a fast turnaround! I haven't heard the name "Crown Books" in a long time. I thought Crown Books were all gone too.

edit to add: Oops! I meant to post this in "What's Going on" thread, not Construction Approval.

Last edited by Phillip; Mar 9, 2009 at 6:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3874  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2009, 6:04 AM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,088
As was reported last year, sometime this year the CHP will be moving into its
headquarters on Richards Blvd. at the Continental Plaza. In June of 2007,
the City Planning Commission extended various entitlements for the
fourth phase of Continental Plaza for an additional ten years (Oct. 2017)
because market conditions to build the 810,000 sf structure were not
possible and because the proposal would revitalizes an existing developed
area and encourages the intensification of uses around light rail stations
which is expected to be built there in the next 5 to 7 years. I don’t
believe this rendering had been posted here of phase IV… so here it is.
It’s planned for the corner of Richards Blvd. and 7th Street.



http://www.cityofsacramento.org/dsd/meetings/commissions/planning/

Last edited by innov8; Mar 12, 2009 at 5:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3875  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2009, 10:03 PM
creamcityleo79's Avatar
creamcityleo79 creamcityleo79 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Robbinsdale, MN
Posts: 1,790
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally Posted by innov8 View Post
Swanston Station Transit Village

The proposed Swanston Station Transit Village is a long-range urban design
that would guide public and private improvements in the Swanston Station
Transit Village Specific Plan area. Encompassing roughly a ½ mile radius
around the Swanston Light Rail Station, the plan includes mixed use land
that promotes a mixture of office, commercial, open space, and medium and
high-density residential uses with 36 units per acre.



The Long-Term Plan includes approximately 213 acres of the Swanston
project area and would result in approximately 2,596 new dwelling units and
505,515 sf of new commercial space. The project could increase the
population within the City by up to 6,670 residents at buildout in 2030.

Last week a Draft Environmental Impact Report was submitted to the City for review.

I know I haven't posted in a while. But, I thought I would make a comment on this one since it hits so close to home.

It is very interesting to me that VERY shortly after USAA (my employer) announced that they would be closing our Sacramento office (most of the commercial space in the project area), that the Draft EIR was submitted. The announcement was made 2/12/09. It's sad to see this is going to happen after we leave (if it happens). The company is relocating all eligible employees who want to (including my husband and myself) this summer and the office will be officially closed by September. I don't know what impact (positive or negative) this has on the proposal. But, again, it makes me sad...and it is very interesting. By the way, we're moving to Colorado Springs, in case anyone was wondering.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3876  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2009, 4:38 PM
Deno Deno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 104
Another company relocates out of state. I don't know of any company who would want to locate in this state.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3877  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2009, 1:31 AM
nevernude nevernude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 17
Found this on the CADA site. I think the Bizjournal has an article too.

East End Gateway Site 1 (16th/N Streets)
CADA Board Selected Developer for EEG1 - Friday, March 20, 2009
Em Johnson Interest and Nehemiah Community Reinvestment Fund Holdings (NCRFH), a member of the Nehemiah family of companies, has been selected as the developer for East End Gateway Site 1. Located on the northwest corner of 16th and N Streets, the site is currently occupied by a parking lot and a small apartment building.

The selected proposal identifies sources of equity and construction financing and emphasizes the development of mid-rise entry-level “workforce” housing. The structure was designed by Devrouax + Purnell Architects and will be 8 floors (7 floors over a concrete podium). The structure will contain 98 condominiums, 6,000 s.f. of retail and 120 parking spaces. Construction is scheduled to begin in October 2010 and be completed by January 2012. The total project development cost is estimated at $37 million.

Projects completed by Em Johnson Interest include the Fillmore Heritage Center and North Beach Place in San Francisco (in partnership with Bridge Housing), Richmond Village, and Palm Villas in Oakland. NCRFH was the joint venture partner in developing over 1,900 units of housing in California, is the developer of the Township 9 project in Sacramento's River District, and provides community lending throughout the United States to help revitalize economically stressed neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3878  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2009, 2:03 AM
innov8's Avatar
innov8 innov8 is offline
Kodachrome
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: livinginurbansac.blogspot
Posts: 5,088


Here's the rendering. It's kinda funny to see the buildings on the left
in the backgroung.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3879  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2009, 8:09 PM
econgrad econgrad is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 795
Bob Shallit: Nehemiah teams with Bay Area firm on midtown condo-retail project
[email protected]
Published Tuesday, Mar. 31, 2009

A Bay Area company known for turning blighted urban sites into cultural hot spots has been tapped to build an eight-story condo and retail project along midtown Sacramento's 16th Street corridor.

Em Johnson Interest Inc. of San Francisco will team with a division of Sacramento-based Nehemiah Corp. on the $37 million project, which is scheduled to start construction next year.

It won't be just another residential complex, says Nehemiah chief exec Scott Syphax.

"This is a signature site," he says of the property a block from Capitol Park at the northwest corner of 16th and N streets. "And this will be a transformative project."

One goal is to link the 98-unit project with the planned Capital Unity Center museum across the street.

A similar neighborhood connection is a hallmark of Em Johnson's highest-profile project in the Bay Area.

Along a once-blighted block in San Francisco's Fillmore District, the company completed a 13-story building in 2007 that includes condos, a restaurant, a nightclub and center celebrating the Fillmore's jazz heritage.

That type of neighborhood-changing project is one reason the Johnson-Nehemiah team was selected for the project, says Marc de la Vergne, development manager of the Capitol Area Development Authority, which owns the parcel.

Another was the likelihood of Johnson-Nehemiah getting construction financing from a large East Coast union pension fund, enabling the project to get under way quickly and "contribute to Sacramento's economic recovery," de la Vergne says.

He views the project – with condos priced between $296,000 and $500,000 – as a bridge to other CADA projects planned for 16th at O and P streets, as well as the proposed Crystal Ice mixed-use project at 16th and R.

"If we can get these all out of the ground," says de la Vergne, "you'll see the most dramatic transformation of any urban corridor in the city."

On the move

In this year's biggest lease deal, chipmaker Numonyx Americas has agreed to take 96,000 square feet in a new Folsom complex.

About 400 local employees will relocate in December, moving from current digs at Intel Corp.'s Folsom campus to a 58,000-square-foot building that Sacramento-based Evergreen Co. developed "on spec" at 2235 Iron Point Road.

Another 50 to 100 staffers will join them in mid-2010 when a 38,000-square-foot addition is completed. It will accommodate Numonyx's need for additional space for the design and testing of computer chips.

"This was a spec project that turned into a build-to-suit, which is unusual," says Dennis Neeley, a senior VP with Grubb & Ellis, who represented Evergreen in the deal.

Numonyx was formed a year ago through a merger of Intel's flash memory division and a unit of Swiss tech giant STMicroelectronics.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3880  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2009, 1:31 AM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 6,007
Anyone know the status on the Cathedral Lofts (or whatever it's called)..??

I was down there last Sunday for Mass at the Cathedral and noticed every business has vacated with signs on the window saying they are going to "knock down the building.".


I thought we are stil years away from that project. It would be horrible idea to let them knock it down and have surface parking lot there indefinitely.
__________________
Sacramento
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Sacramento Area
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:27 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.