Quote:
Originally Posted by mwalker_mw
I'm a strong believer that a cyclist should either ride specifically in the parking lane where there is adequate room or completely take the traffic lane when there is not. Riding half-in half-out (and frequently switching back and forth) just causes confusion for everybody. As a cyclist one has the right to fully occupy a lane of traffic - where vehicles or other obstacles make safe travel in the parking lane impossible it would be better for everyone if all cyclists would do this consistently (signalling properly when doing so).
I suspect there are far fewer drivers willing to drive straight through a cyclist centred in the lane in front of them than the number who are willing to pass way to closely to one riding on the side. On the other hand I do see a number of cyclists who put themselves in this situation by riding up beside traffic queuing at a light leaving the motorist unaware there is a cyclist who has snuck up in the 12" between them and the curb on their right side.
The other side of this is the cyclist's responsibility to be making the most efficient use of that traffic lane while they are occupying it - peddling at a brisk pace and leaving it promptly when it becomes safe to do so. Too many "I'm so cool" types ambling about in traffic with no safety gear on cruiser bicycles completely ill equipped for moving and maneuvering in any sort of brisk manner.
I don't cycle as much as I'd like anymore and that is at least partly due to the high risk of becoming roadkill in this city.
|
Simple, painted bike-lanes can solve all the problems you listed. A reminder that not all cyclists are the 50km/h carbon fibre types. Some will saunter (i.e. the cool types), some are old, some are young and some are not in a hurry. A typically bike is 15 - 25 km/h and cars have to get used to that until dedicated infrastructure is built like bike lanes. Separated is even better, albeit probably more cost-effective in only tight high-collision areas with lots of traffic and speed (i.e. 7th street).
I am a cyclist you describe that rides straight at speed in a travel lane where I have to. It sometimes stops cars from passing or who don't mind going 20 - 30 km/h, however on a bike you are put in risk but jerks who get extra mad because passing you is harder now. All my close calls have been when I take up the lane and someone gets frustrated they can't go 50km/h in the beltline on streets like 15th ave so they try to pass me anyways at full speed when there is no room.
Really what it will take is a cultural shift to thinking cars aren't supposed to go 50km/h in the beltline (except maybe 11th and 12th). There are too many people, pedestrians, cyclists and cars to drive faster than 20 - 40 safely on the back roads.
The douches acting aggressively around bikes will eventually lose out, the Beltline increases to densify and that kind of recklessness will no longer be possible given increasing congestion of cycling and peds.