Quote:
Originally Posted by davehook_729
I'm super disappointed with the chosen land use for long wharf. they could have created an urban village. For once there is a chunk of prime development land that can't be influenced by the trinity royal heritage people, so they should have planned something more modern and exciting than a little police-station style building on a huge lot. I was expecting an iconic landmark for Irving's "world headquarters"...which will now just be another general office building. The landscaping is nice, but I think there's a little too much of it considering Harbour Passage and Fort LaTour are directly adjacent.
|
I agree somewhat, and I brought this point up with a couple of the architects at the consultation yesterday. Both said that Federal charters about port lands prohibited putting residential space on the wharf, and they felt that the growth of housing on the Coast Guard site mitigated the need to put residential buildings on the wharf itself. They could obviously tell my concern about the lack of mixed-use commercial/residential/retail on the site and so they did mention that there has been interest in reclaiming the land where the electrical substation is at the foot of Union, possibly for more office or residential development. Anyway I had some very nice chats with a few of the people, about everything from the building's massing to the use of localized wetlands on-site to deal with runoff, and I was impressed with the hired firm's attention to detail.
My overall impression is that while I may have designed things quite differently had I been given the chance, the project is nonetheless a positive one and will be a high-class addition to our little post-industrial harbourfront.
Either way you slice it, its a hell of an improvement:
