HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3801  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 4:21 AM
Orlando's Avatar
Orlando Orlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,122
Fyi, here's a rough massing model insert into Google Earth of the proposed towers along State Street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3802  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 1:02 PM
Utah_Dave Utah_Dave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 698
Nice...

Thanks for the visuals
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3803  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 2:21 PM
Makid Makid is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
Whether or not the City will agree with the developer, a 40-story tower (assuming 440' tall hotel/residential tower) would stick out like sore thumb over there. I think it would be more fitting over on Arrow Press Square.
While it would look a bit out of place, it isn't alone in the area though. There will be 2, 11 story buildings on the NW corner of the block (125' approx each) plus the pink/salmon senior complex.

The 40+ story tower would be next to another building that is around 375' in height. If the 40+ story tower is due to the setbacks, it would be a Residential and Hotel building leaving the Commercial Tower at 375'. This means that there could be a height difference between the 2 towers of 40' to 75' unless the developer went above 450'.

This is only 1 block away from the CCH at roughly 375' on the NW corner of 200S and West Temple.

It could encourage redevelopment of the building on the SE corner of 200S and 200W (SE from RWP) which is zoned D1 already.

This would, if the rumor is true, help to stretch the skyline, further activate 200 South between West Temple and 300 West, and help break through another ceiling level.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3804  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 4:00 PM
Old&New's Avatar
Old&New Old&New is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makid View Post
While it would look a bit out of place, it isn't alone in the area though. There will be 2, 11 story buildings on the NW corner of the block (125' approx each) plus the pink/salmon senior complex.

The 40+ story tower would be next to another building that is around 375' in height. If the 40+ story tower is due to the setbacks, it would be a Residential and Hotel building leaving the Commercial Tower at 375'. This means that there could be a height difference between the 2 towers of 40' to 75' unless the developer went above 450'.

This is only 1 block away from the CCH at roughly 375' on the NW corner of 200S and West Temple.

It could encourage redevelopment of the building on the SE corner of 200S and 200W (SE from RWP) which is zoned D1 already.

This would, if the rumor is true, help to stretch the skyline, further activate 200 South between West Temple and 300 West, and help break through another ceiling level.


Orlando, can you add the other developments on the royal wood block in your massing model?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3805  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 7:31 PM
Makid Makid is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,090
Moda Luxe has submitted information to the planning commission for CBDR approval. No documents on the URL yet but hopefully they will be added soon.

Below is the most recent design.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3806  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2018, 11:53 PM
Liberty Wellsian Liberty Wellsian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 810
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
Whether or not the City will agree with the developer, a 40-story tower (assuming 440' tall hotel/residential tower) would stick out like sore thumb over there. I think it would be more fitting over on Arrow Press Square.
Come on now. That's from the south by Southwest(an angle that would most exaggerate it's sore thumbiness) quite close up, and an elevated view. No one, outside of a drone pilot, ever views SLC like that.

Give us one looking to the east from I-15 or from the south by southwest at ground level.

It ain't nearly that bad.

Further a sore thumb can be a catalyst for fingers. 400 feet plus on that corner would be great for this city. Absolutely it would be.

Imagine that tower in the view below

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3807  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2018, 4:05 AM
Orlando's Avatar
Orlando Orlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,122
Still not convinced?


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3808  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2018, 4:19 AM
jubguy3's Avatar
jubguy3 jubguy3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 984
At this point I honestly don't care if its all the way in Rose Park. Please just build the tower
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3809  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2018, 4:49 AM
wrendog's Avatar
wrendog wrendog is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 4,263
I'm convinced that while it may look weird at first, it would spur tower growth on the west side and expand downtown. Get er built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3810  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2018, 5:03 AM
StevenF's Avatar
StevenF StevenF is offline
The Drifter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,172
Orlando, put in the other 3 buildings on the RWP site and I am sure it won't look quite as bad. Also does not help that the convention center takes up 3 city blocks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3811  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2018, 7:14 AM
DMTower's Avatar
DMTower DMTower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 811
Right now the convention center is a big wall where all towers stop. I'd love to see that wall broken and towers start popping up around it. Portland's skyline has no cohesion whatsoever, yet it feels and functions like a great, dense urban city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3812  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2018, 7:53 AM
bob rulz bob rulz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 1,609
Are we really going to complain about the potential of a 400 ft. tower to throw off the "balance" of our skyline?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3813  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2018, 1:19 PM
Always Sunny in SLC Always Sunny in SLC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 516
The balance of a skyline isn’t really a thing for me, but for those that it is I think it is worth noting that there really isn’t anywhere else that you can reasonably expect a tower to go up anytime in the next decade or two on the west side. The one exception is perhaps the LDS Churches parking lot on South Temple, but I think they are holding onto that land to preserve their view corridor. Further I think it would be a bad idea to have too much height. You would ruin the mid rise vibe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3814  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2018, 1:53 PM
jubguy3's Avatar
jubguy3 jubguy3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 984
Quote:
Originally Posted by Always Sunny in SLC View Post
The balance of a skyline isn’t really a thing for me, but for those that it is I think it is worth noting that there really isn’t anywhere else that you can reasonably expect a tower to go up anytime in the next decade or two on the west side. The one exception is perhaps the LDS Churches parking lot on South Temple, but I think they are holding onto that land to preserve their view corridor. Further I think it would be a bad idea to have too much height. You would ruin the mid rise vibe.
That’s the other thing that I think doesn’t get enough attention. The burj khalifa is not dense or urban. Having spent lots of time in Amsterdam, Paris, Prague, etc. I think that not enough weight is placed on the importance of midrise buildings and street life in SLC. Even the most engaging streets in SLC are relatively dead. I feel like a tower in that location would do a ton to encourage midrise development and create a more engaging street.

I hate the Salt Palace as a whole for what it does to 200W, but at least a hotel would incentivize them to try to improve it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3815  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2018, 3:13 PM
EPdesign EPdesign is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 863
Maybe they shouldn’t have built the Empire State Building either.


Out in the middle of nowhere.

The monstrosity sticking out.

Instead of with all the other buildings where it could be more easily hid.

I’m waiting for my colleague to confirm what I heard. If it’s so.....I’m excited
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3816  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2018, 3:22 PM
EPdesign EPdesign is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
Still not convinced?
Thank you so much for generating these Orlando!

I can see the south west really going into a high rise development boom. Fingers crossed. The surface lots in close proximity to the potential Millennium Tower by Help Properties can be the catalyst to shift the growing skyline south west as the original core only becomes more dense
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3817  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2018, 5:26 PM
Utah_Dave Utah_Dave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 698
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
Still not convinced?


I’m really liking the middle photo. If that, or something like it becomes reality one day the city will have some great density. I also noticed a small massing on the 1st south location from the middle photo. I hope we get something nice for that spot. I don’t think we talked about that location for a long time. Any rumors about Zions bank on that ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3818  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2018, 5:35 PM
Pencil's Avatar
Pencil Pencil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 145
This is getting me really excited
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3819  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2018, 8:04 PM
bob rulz bob rulz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 1,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by jubguy3 View Post
That’s the other thing that I think doesn’t get enough attention. The burj khalifa is not dense or urban. Having spent lots of time in Amsterdam, Paris, Prague, etc. I think that not enough weight is placed on the importance of midrise buildings and street life in SLC. Even the most engaging streets in SLC are relatively dead. I feel like a tower in that location would do a ton to encourage midrise development and create a more engaging street.

I hate the Salt Palace as a whole for what it does to 200W, but at least a hotel would incentivize them to try to improve it.
Yeah I'm much more interested in how it would affect the street level than in how it would look from afar. Obviously it would still look great from afar if it did get built (assuming it's an engaging design at least) and I would love it if this does end up happening, but that's why I champion this apartment and mixed-use infill instead of disparaging it for not being tall enough. Urban vibrancy won't come without this infill. Of course I would like to see taller buildings too, but people act like it's the be-all end-all of urban development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3820  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2018, 8:31 PM
asies1981 asies1981 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
Still not convinced?


Keep in mind that Ritchie Group plans to build at least two towers at the parcel, two 11-story buildings and another 7 story building so that the tallest tower will have its own pyramid on that block.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:48 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.