Quote:
Originally Posted by lio45
Apparently also Alberta/Montana, it's being pointed out in a recurring manner in these threads.
(I'll defer to the experience of those who know better, as I've never been to Alberta; I've been to Montana and it was pretty much like I expected, and it was what I expect AB to be like too.)
In my opinion all the differences can be traced to the basic fact that the worth and appeal of Alberta-Montana land + climate are really really low in an American context yet decent in a Canadian one.
Also with the NW->SE way the fossil fuel deposits belt lies (AB-SK-ND), from that point of view one might say that ND is actually a better American "match" for AB than MT.
|
There is an approx 30 mile wide belt (15 miles on each side) on the 49th from the Lake of the Woods to the foothills (Minnesota, ND, Mont, MB, SK and AB) that there is alot of interaction. People owning land on either side, farming and ranching, marriage, sports, business, etc. I know of many people in SW Manitoba who would have their children born in ND so that they would have dual citizenship.
But once you got more than 15 to 20 miles north or south of the line the connections quickly disappear.