HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


    Two Gilmore Place in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Burnaby Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #361  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2018, 4:41 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,621
An article / ad in the Star Metro Vancouver newspaper stated that the tallest tower would be "over 700ft".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #362  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2018, 8:42 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,131
taller than 213M, nice. Hope Concord sees this as an arms race and ups the tallest tower at their metrotown Sears site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #363  
Old Posted May 23, 2018, 5:07 PM
SkyboxInvestment SkyboxInvestment is offline
Ex-Banker. R/E Insider
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 33
From what I recall with Onni reps mentioning

First 3 towers will have 1,500+ units in total.
Tower one is 51 stories, with Tower 2 (corner of Gilmore / Lougheed) being tallest at 62 stories+, and Tower 3 much lower at 40-45.

__________________
Ex-Banker.
R/E Investor + Broker specializing in VIP Presales
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #364  
Old Posted May 23, 2018, 6:04 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Will they be doing sales at a tower at a time?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #365  
Old Posted May 23, 2018, 8:13 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,621
... much lower at 40-45 storeys...

Only in Burnaby!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #366  
Old Posted May 24, 2018, 2:18 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,401
Yeah, the same caught my ear as well, but there is truth to that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #367  
Old Posted May 24, 2018, 2:48 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,947
So is that a reduction from 64 for the tallest?

Or was the 64 just the official floor count omitting the 4th and 13th floors?

Still would love to see some official schematics / diagrams and actually learn their hights...
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #368  
Old Posted May 24, 2018, 3:08 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
So is that a reduction from 64 for the tallest?

Or was the 64 just the official floor count omitting the 4th and 13th floors?

Still would love to see some official schematics / diagrams and actually learn their hights...
There is no omitting floor numbers anymore in Burnaby. So no
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #369  
Old Posted May 24, 2018, 4:03 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
There is no omitting floor numbers anymore in Burnaby. So no
Oh I know that, but wasn’t the info this thread title is based on provided before that regulation came into affect? (And before this project was officially proposed)?
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #370  
Old Posted May 24, 2018, 2:12 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Oh I know that, but wasn’t the info this thread title is based on provided before that regulation came into affect? (And before this project was officially proposed)?
Oh yeah you might be right then haha. I didn't realize it was all the way back in 2014 when this was first proposed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #371  
Old Posted May 25, 2018, 8:36 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
So is that a reduction from 64 for the tallest?

Or was the 64 just the official floor count omitting the 4th and 13th floors?
Well it says 62 storeys+ ... so there could be a few more floating around.

This one should be going into sales mode this summer. Exciting times.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #372  
Old Posted May 25, 2018, 10:12 PM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Well it says 62 storeys+ ... so there could be a few more floating around.

This one should be going into sales mode this summer. Exciting times.
I hope it does well - I definitely want to see the tall one go up.

To clarify - is the tallest going up first? Or second?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #373  
Old Posted May 28, 2018, 8:58 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,131
I'm not sure, we'll find out in the next 60 or so days I hear.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #374  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2018, 3:36 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,698
Reliable source: the height of the taller tower is 705 ft.

(could vary +/- a few feet before construction)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #375  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2018, 4:14 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,485
Hopefully the source is more reliable than the New Home and Condo Guide lol.

(Originally posted just over a year ago)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Metro Vancouver is finally getting a new tallest building. The flagship tower of Gilmore Place will be over 700ft. From the New Home and Condo Guide:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #376  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2018, 1:04 AM
Nites Nites is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,558
700 ft nice! It won't be long till we see a 800-900 footer go up and then potentially a supertall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #377  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2018, 1:38 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by phesto View Post
Reliable source: the height of the taller tower is 705 ft.

(could vary +/- a few feet before construction)
Nice, thanks. Would love to see an actual diagram.

So that makes it 214.8 metres tall.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #378  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2018, 1:38 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,158
Quote:
Originally Posted by skymaster View Post
700 ft nice! It won't be long till we see a 800-900 footer go up and then potentially a supertall.

i'm guessing that anything over 700 feet or so in Brentwood is concentrating too much density and cost in one tower in a multi tower development like Gilmore, given the 5 FSR limit. Metrotown (Sears site) on the other hand has a total FSR limit of 11 - 5 residential plus 6 commercial. A 1000 foot tower would be shocking to see in Burnaby, but it wouldn't shock me if it happened. I would imagine it would come in the form of a hotel/residence, as the tallest towers in Vancouver come in this form.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #379  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2018, 5:49 PM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
i'm guessing that anything over 700 feet or so in Brentwood is concentrating too much density and cost in one tower in a multi tower development like Gilmore, given the 5 FSR limit. Metrotown (Sears site) on the other hand has a total FSR limit of 11 - 5 residential plus 6 commercial. A 1000 foot tower would be shocking to see in Burnaby, but it wouldn't shock me if it happened. I would imagine it would come in the form of a hotel/residence, as the tallest towers in Vancouver come in this form.
A super tall in Metrotown would be so unreal given Metrotown's topographical location.

The shame of Gilmore going 700ft+ is that its downhill from the Mall site and from SoLo.

I imagine a 700 footer will still top out lower than Mall towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #380  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2018, 3:11 PM
GilmoreStation GilmoreStation is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 465
Gilmore Place Fly-Through - Burnaby's Most Anticipated Master-Planned Community
Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:10 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.