HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #361  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2024, 2:57 PM
originalmuffins originalmuffins is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 877
Honestly both those lots are so stupid. It is such a wasted opportunity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #362  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2024, 3:46 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,780
As I said earlier, no sidewalk is planned on Limebank between Earl Armstrong and the transit station. Maybe they will build something as development occurs, but it is shocking that there is no sidewalk from day one when the station opens. I was there yesterday, and as it stands, you have to walk in a traffic lane in winter, not much different from in my neighbourhood, where I regularly see people walking in Bank Street traffic lanes because there is no other place for pedestrians. In situations such as this, it takes a fatality before there is city action.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #363  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2024, 3:51 PM
zzptichka zzptichka is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Outaouias
Posts: 2,367
Who is the councilor for that area?
__________________
My aerial Ottawa photos on Flickr đź“·
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #364  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2024, 3:56 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
As I said earlier, no sidewalk is planned on Limebank between Earl Armstrong and the transit station. Maybe they will build something as development occurs, but it is shocking that there is no sidewalk from day one when the station opens. I was there yesterday, and as it stands, you have to walk in a traffic lane in winter, not much different from in my neighbourhood, where I regularly see people walking in Bank Street traffic lanes because there is no other place for pedestrians. In situations such as this, it takes a fatality before there is city action.
Priority was empty parking lots at the empty field stations, not people would might actually walk to the station.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zzptichka View Post
Who is the councilor for that area?
Steve Desroches. He was Councillor for two terms 2006-2014. When first elected, he promised he would only serve two terms. He kept that promise, until he didn't when he ran in 2022.

https://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/mayor-and...or-ward-22-riverside-south-findlay-creek
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #365  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2024, 3:58 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by originalmuffins View Post
Honestly both those lots are so stupid. It is such a wasted opportunity.
What did we expect? The original plan brought LRT within walking distance of most local residents. Instead, we chose regional trains that are mostly good only for commuting. So, by default, transit is not an option for local trips. For the vast majority of locals, this means shopping trips must be by car.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #366  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2024, 4:00 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Priority was empty parking lots at the empty field stations, not people would might actually walk to the station.



Steve Desroches. He was Councillor for two terms 2006-2014. When first elected, he promised he would only serve two terms. He kept that promise, until he didn't when he ran in 2022.

https://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/mayor-and...or-ward-22-riverside-south-findlay-creek
Don't bring up that name please. I am not a happy camper.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #367  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2024, 5:07 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
Don't bring up that name please. I am not a happy camper.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #368  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2024, 1:33 AM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 28,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Priority was empty parking lots at the empty field stations, not people would might actually walk to the station.
I used to be sympathetic to suburban rail expansion. Shit like this is radicalizing me against all future rail extensions into the burbs. If this is what they are going to build along a literal billion dollar rail line, what's the point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Steve Desroches. He was Councillor for two terms 2006-2014. When first elected, he promised he would only serve two terms. He kept that promise, until he didn't when he ran in 2022.

https://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/mayor-and...or-ward-22-riverside-south-findlay-creek
Can't blame him for taking advantage of constituents who are so willing to roll over for name recognition.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #369  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2024, 1:44 AM
LRTeverywhere LRTeverywhere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 326
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
As I said earlier, no sidewalk is planned on Limebank between Earl Armstrong and the transit station. Maybe they will build something as development occurs, but it is shocking that there is no sidewalk from day one when the station opens. I was there yesterday, and as it stands, you have to walk in a traffic lane in winter, not much different from in my neighbourhood, where I regularly see people walking in Bank Street traffic lanes because there is no other place for pedestrians. In situations such as this, it takes a fatality before there is city action.
While I definetly agree that it should have sidewalks from the get go, there will be a sidewalk and multi use path on main street that runs parallel to Limebank up to Earl Armstrong that will connect to the station, so the two most likely devolopments to start construction soon will be connected from day one. (Not that I like these devolopment styles!).

From a recent secondary plan meeting the city showed off that there is a future application for the south west corner, the one immediately adjancent to the site. The city will likely require this devoloper build that Limebank sidewalk, and the other one for the south east corner will build that sidewalk.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #370  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2024, 1:43 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,843
City had a presentation on the 3D Digital Twi project at the Planning and Housing Committee last week. Starts at 29:00.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16pK3mtnRj4&list=WL&index=13&t=1391s

Presentation:

https://pub-ottawa.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=164249

Amongst other things, this will have models of of completed secondary plans and proposals on a digital 3D version of Ottawa. Hope this will be part of GeoOttawa.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #371  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2024, 6:05 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,580
Ottawa to get $176M from federal housing fund
Deal aims to speed up construction of 4,400 housing units over 3 years, but comes with strings

Arthur White-Crummey · CBC News
Posted: Feb 12, 2024 11:13 AM EST | Last Updated: 41 minutes ago


The federal government is pledging to give Ottawa about $176 million through a housing deal that commits the city to loosen zoning rules to allow more units in return.

The money comes from the federal government's $4-billion Housing Accelerator Fund (HAF), which Housing Minister Sean Fraser has been doling out to cities that show "ambition" on helping speed up construction.

Federal and municipal officials announced the agreement on Monday at the site of an Ottawa Community Housing project at Wateridge Village on a former east-end military base.

In a media release, the federal government said the deal will fast-track more than 4,400 housing units in Ottawa over the next three years, while spurring development of thousands more over the decade.

Referring to the multimillion dollar deal as a "huge downpayment," Ottawa Mayor Mark Sutcliffe said the city worked hard to get as much money as it could from the federal government.

"I think our job at the City of Ottawa, and with the support of our federal partners, is to make it as easy as possible to build as fast as possible," Sutcliffe said at the Monday morning announcement.

"Then it's up to the development community and to homebuyers to take it from there."

The announcement comes less than three months after city council asked staff to look at allowing four units on all serviced lots as part of an ongoing zoning bylaw review.

Fraser has talked up that policy, which would allow fourplexes even in low-density areas, in his negotiations with cities across the country. At least one city, Windsor, Ont., that didn't make the change lost out on the money.

The media release announcing Ottawa's deal said it "will allow for more housing options in the city, including more rental, affordable, and missing middle-housing, with up to four units as-of-right through their comprehensive By-Law Review process." It does not mention any distinction between serviced and unserviced lots.

Fraser was not at Monday's announcement, which instead saw Kanata–Carleton MP and Minister of Families, Children and Social Development Jenna Sudds standing beside the mayor.

"Business as usual will not solve the drastic housing challenges that we face today," she said. "We need systematic change to how we build housing in this country."

The city's application, approved by council in July, listed nine separate actions to speed up housing construction in Ottawa. They include:
  • Using HAF money to support non-profit affordable housing projects that are ready to build but lack funding.
  • Easing zoning rules around major transit stations to allow taller buildings.
  • Making city-owned land available quickly for affordable housing.
  • A community improvement plan providing financial incentives for affordable housing.
  • Streamlining planning approvals.
  • An on-site stormwater management tool to support multi-unit infill developments.

Council had also pledged to implement a provincially imposed policy to allow three units as of right. That would now be superseded by the four-unit policy, which council would still have to pass as part of the new zoning bylaw.

The federal government's media release says the city has agreed to introduce the bylaw in the first half of 2024.

Sudds would not speculate on what will happen if the city doesn't pass those changes, while the mayor insisted that the bylaw will not be fast-tracked and will undergo the usual level of public consultation.

Another commitment — clearing bureaucratic hurdles to converting office space into housing — already passed council in November.

When council passed the action plan, the city estimated those efforts would together support the creation of nearly 7,000 housing units, rather than the 4,400 estimated in the new deal.

Monday's announcement follows deals with London, Ont., for $74 million, Halifax for $79 million, Mississauga, Ont., for $113 million, Vancouver for $115 million and Toronto for $471 million, among others.

Across Canada, the HAF aims to trigger construction of hundreds of thousands of additional homes in the next decade.

But a 2023 report by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation estimated that the country will need about 3.5 million more homes by 2030 — beyond what would be built anyway — to push affordability back to 2004 levels.

Ontario alone will need about 1.5 million, according to the report.

Last year, there were 8,632 housing starts in Ottawa, according to CMHC, most of them apartments.

HAF money comes with conditions, as cities are subject to reporting requirements and progress reviews to make sure they're implementing commitments. Only part of the total will be released up front, with the rest coming in annual instalments over three years.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ottawa-housing-construction-money-accelerator-1.7112332
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #372  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2024, 7:16 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,843
Amazing to see we got more money that expected. A rare sight. Should help Gladstone Village along quite a bit.

Really hoping OCH can move on the lot between Dream LeBreton and Adisoke. Shameful to leave that gap in the expanded urban fabric.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #373  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2024, 12:18 AM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 864
Yeah I wouldn't count on anything until we actually make the required changes, and considering the current sitting Chair of the planning committee fought 4 plexes in his ward, Approved the new changes to planning that have only increased the times of proposals, Voted against most High-rises near mass transit...I'm not holding my breath that the required changes will be done at all, nvm in time....

https://x.com/ABetterOttawa/status/1757081883534332165?s=20
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #374  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2024, 3:18 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,580
Feds’ $176M contribution no silver bullet to solve housing crisis, Ottawa developer says

David Sali, OBJ
February 12, 2024 4:06 PM ET


An advocate for Ottawa’s homebuilding industry says a $176-million influx of federal cash to speed up the pace of housing construction in the capital could make it more cost-effective for developers to build much-needed affordable units.

Federal and municipal officials announced the new funding Monday at Wateridge Village, an Ottawa Community Housing project on the site of a former military base in the city’s east end.

The cash comes from the federal government’s $4-billion Housing Accelerator Fund, which aims to spur construction of new homes across Canada. In a news release, the feds said they expect the funding to fast-track more than 4,400 housing units in Ottawa over the next three years and more than 30,000 units over the next decade.

“This funding won’t solve the housing crisis on its own,” Ottawa Mayor Mark Sutcliffe said at a morning news conference. “But it is a giant leap forward for our city and allows Ottawa to take bold and immediate actions to mitigate the housing crisis, build more homes and build faster.

“We want to open the doors, eliminate the obstacles, reduce the barriers and make it as easy as possible to build as fast as possible.”

The City of Ottawa said Monday that 90 per cent of the funds will be used for affordable housing, such as capital funding for shovel-ready projects and financial incentives for developments that include affordable units.

The rest of the money is expected to go toward measures that help streamline development approvals, such as electronic permitting and digital applications, and enhanced services.

Jason Burggraaf, the executive director of the Greater Ottawa Home Builders’ Association, said cutting red tape at city hall would save developers time and money as they ramp up construction of more units to meet the city’s ambitious housing goals.

“We want to see what the timelines are, what those deliverables are,” Burggraaf said. “There’s a lot of talk of improving the application process, the timelines, reducing barriers, which all contribute to housing affordability. Let’s see what those details are and make sure that they fulfil the intent.”

The city said the new agreement with the feds will pave the way for “more housing options,” including rentals, affordable units and “missing middle” housing that could be achieved by allowing up to four units on a single lot instead of the maximum of three that are now allowed in Ottawa.

Federal Housing Minister Sean Fraser has pushed for more fourplex developments when rolling out HAF funding in other cities. Last November, Ottawa council approved a motion directing city staff to look at allowing four units on all serviced lots as part of their review of the new zoning bylaw.

Sutcliffe said Monday a new bylaw will be introduced before the end of June, adding he expects it to be approved by council some time next year.

Fraser did not attend Monday’s announcement. But Kanata-Carleton MP Jenna Sudds, who also serves as the federal minister of families, children and social development, told reporters there is an “expectation” that council will follow the process to consider allowing four units per lot.

“I have full confidence in our community and in our city that we will reach that (goal),” Sudds added. “I think we’re in a very good place.”

Burggraaf said clearing the way for fourplexes would make it more economical for builders to launch new projects because four units per lot is the threshold for developers to qualify for relief from GST and HST under new guidelines for purpose-built rental housing.

“This kind of low-rise conversion into multiple units is critical for the city if it wants to achieve its housing goals,” he explained.

“We really need (the four-unit policy) so that … really small developers can start taking advantage of building those smaller, for-purpose rental units.”

However, one of the city’s leading property developers said taxpayer dollars might be better spent on upgrading sewers and other infrastructure in neighbourhoods that aren’t equipped to handle additional density.

“It’s fine and dandy to promise we’re going to rezone for four units on every single-family-home-zoned property, but there are some infrastructure shortfalls that need to be addressed to get there,” Claridge Homes vice-president Neil Malhotra said in an interview on Monday afternoon.

“The pipes in the ground were not built for every house to turn into four units. Somebody’s going to have to figure out how to pay for that.”

Malhotra noted that development fees – one-time charges levied on homebuilders to help pay for growth-related infrastructure expenses – now account for the second-biggest chunk of his firm’s construction costs.

The fees went up nearly 10 per cent last October, and Malhotra expects them to rise even more as the strain on municipal infrastructure grows with each new housing development.

Developers will have no choice but to pass those extra costs on to homebuyers, he said.

“If the city’s working assumption is that development charges are going to pay for all this, it’s going to have a little bit of a negative impact on the housing market at the end of the day,” Malhotra said.

While acknowledging there is a “desperate need” for more affordable housing, Malhotra said the latest funding won’t solve the underlying issues – such as soaring construction and financing costs – that have driven prices out of the reach of many Ottawa residents.

“It’s not going to take the strain off the middle market – especially if these changes trigger higher development charges, which they’re going to,” he said.

https://obj.ca/feds-176m-contribution-no-silver-bullet-to-solve-housing-crisis/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #375  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2024, 1:32 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,580
New housing money is great but Ottawa can do a lot more to speed up home-building
Imagine a world where the city cut away all the red tape so that if a builder presented a plan that was certified as structurally sound, council just said yes.

Randall Denley, Ottawa Citizen
Published Feb 13, 2024 • 3 minute read


There were smiles all around Monday as local MPs and city politicians gathered to announce Ottawa’s share of the feds’ $4-billion Housing Accelerator Fund, and why not?

It was a good negotiation for the city, which got more than the $150 million it had anticipated from the federal government. The city achieved this result without doing much that it didn’t intend to do anyway. The one exception is agreeing to the feds’ demand for automatic approval of up to four units on a single family lot. The provincial standard is three. The federal government seems to think this is a game changer, but it’s a slow way to add housing.

The $176.3 million Ottawa got will mostly benefit those waiting for government-subsidized housing. Ninety per cent of the money will be used to help pay for such projects. About 4,450 units are expected over three years. The federal government also speculates that various provisions to speed approvals in the broader housing market “will help fast track” 32,600 homes in Ottawa over the next decade.

Let’s put that in context. Ottawa’s provincial housing target calls for 151,000 units over a decade. Last year, there were 8,632 housing starts in the city, 78 per cent of its annual goal, according to provincial figures.

The federal government claims that its $4-billion fund will fast-track 100,000 new homes across the country over three years and 550,000 over a decade.

That’s a big number, but it’s dwarfed by the expected demand. In its latest housing estimate, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation says that the country will build 2.2 million homes by 2030, but it will require 3.5 million units on top of that to restore housing affordability.

Monday’s announcement in Ottawa, like those that have preceded it across the country, imagines that there are big gains to be made by simplifying and speeding up housing approvals. It’s a bit like thinking that your car will go farther on a tank of gas if you drive it faster.

Rules and targets won’t overcome the biggest limitations on housing supply, which are high interest rates, high material costs and skilled labour shortages. There just aren’t enough builders and trades people to meet the level of demand created by outsized immigration numbers.

That said, development approvals should be simpler and cheaper, to maximize industry capacity and keep the approval costs down. Ottawa will take an important first step toward that goal when it releases its new zoning bylaw policy this summer. Its zoning rules are out of date and generally don’t reflect the heights and densities allowed under the current Official Plan. Bringing zoning and the plan into sync will reduce time-consuming rezoning applications.

That should only be the start. If they want houses built faster, city politicians have to ask themselves what real value is added by the many steps and studies they require before a development is approved.

Imagine a world this simple. Say a particular site was zoned for a 20-storey residential building and a builder presented a plan for just such a building, a plan that been certified as structurally sound by a professional engineer. Shouldn’t the city, so desperate for housing, just say yes?

That would mean councillors and city staff would no longer have an opportunity to quibble over things like the shadows the building would cast, the amount of parking, and the fate of individual trees. It would also prevent them from imposing their esthetic preferences on the building’s appearance.

As it stands, the city applies an almost ludicrous level of control over the details of new development. That’s what slows housing approvals. Drive around town sometime and see if you think it’s producing fantastic results.

Mayor Mark Sutcliffe described the city’s job quite accurately Monday when he said it is “to make it as easy as possible for people to build as fast as possible.” That goal is still a long way off.


Randall Denley is an Ottawa journalist and author. Contact him at [email protected]

https://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/denley...-do-a-lot-more-to-speed-up-home-building
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #376  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2024, 3:42 AM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 864
Denley seems to be on a streak as of late...between this and his correct stance on Menards bribes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #377  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2024, 2:11 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,843
La porte est grande ouverte pour réduire le nombre de stationnements à Gatineau
Par Mathieu Bélanger, Le Droit
16 février 2024 à 16h57


La revendication d’abolir le seuil minimal d’espaces de stationnement dans les nouveaux immeubles faite jeudi par de nombreux acteurs de l’industrie de la construction, de la communauté d’affaires et des groupes environnementalistes semble avoir trouvé plusieurs oreilles attentives au conseil municipal de Gatineau.

https://www.ledroit.com/actualites/actua...s-a-gatineau-AVSGMWJM4JBCXK4X74IJRQ75BM/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #378  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2024, 2:48 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,580
Calls grow to axe minimum parking rules for housing projects
City councillor expects draft zoning bylaw this year will propose a cut

Arthur White-Crummey · CBC News
Posted: Feb 21, 2024 6:21 AM EST | Last Updated: 3 hours ago


When towers come up for debate at Ottawa city council's planning and housing committee, talk often turns to parking.

Developers come with projects that offer fewer parking spaces than housing units, then neighbours worry all those extra cars will spill onto quiet residential streets, turning their communities into parking lots.

As the city works on a new zoning bylaw, there's a growing consensus that it should further relax parking rules to allow developers to build even fewer parking spots — or perhaps none at all.

"The parking minimum makes for more expensive housing," said Coun. Jeff Leiper, who chairs the planning and housing committee.

"It is counter to the trends of reduced car ownership. It is counter to the trends of younger people not getting cars at all. It is counter to … our thrust to try to increase reliance on public transit."

Under the current bylaw, the city rules require apartment buildings to offer at least 1.2 parking spots for every housing unit in the outer suburbs such as Barrhaven, Orléans and Kanata.


<more>


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/minimum-parking-rules-ottawa-housing-projects-1.7120400
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #379  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2024, 7:58 PM
shelltime shelltime is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 34
No parking in the burbs is never going to happen, you wouldn't be able to market a project. Downtown, way less parking is being built compared to 10 years ago and seems to be going in the right direction... Jeff is just pandering to the anti car crowd.

the culture war around cars aside, our transit sucks. Fix that and maybe Ottawans won't drive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #380  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2024, 8:47 PM
Kelnoz Kelnoz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by shelltime View Post
No parking in the burbs is never going to happen, you wouldn't be able to market a project. Downtown, way less parking is being built compared to 10 years ago and seems to be going in the right direction... Jeff is just pandering to the anti car crowd.
Then why are so many developers asking for derogations or building exactly at the minimum? Parking minimums are to force developers to provide more parking than they would otherwise. If you don't think they matter than it's just good policy to remove them, not pandering.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:34 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.