HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2014, 9:27 PM
ivanwolf's Avatar
ivanwolf ivanwolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 469
I think they are too waiting for the Waller Creek Tunnel to get done too. Also they may be waiting of FEMA or someone to determine flood status. That could determine types of construction on the ground floor or insurance premiums to build and such. Maybe looking to get a LOMAR in place first or started but can't due to the uncompleted tunnel? currently the property is nearly completely in the 500yr floodplain and the corner is in the 100yr. So those issues could play into their delays as they could impact construction costs depending how they have to start the building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2014, 5:27 AM
Homecreek Homecreek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 115
It looked like they were moving the utility poles on the north end of the lot today. Maybe just maybe.......
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2014, 5:57 PM
Austin1971 Austin1971 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 828
New month. Any news?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2014, 6:36 PM
Spaceman Spaceman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 417
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin1971 View Post
New month. Any news?
Nope.......too quiet
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2014, 6:48 AM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between RRock and a hard place
Posts: 4,474
I've kinda gotten over the Fairmont right now. If it gets built, great...if not, there's plenty of other significant towers being built. Plus, the JW Marriott is such a huge and beautiful building, better than most of us expected, its sort of compensates for the lack of progress on the Fairmont. So as of now, I'll go on record as saying I no longer care if this thing gets built or not.

Last edited by the Genral; Mar 2, 2014 at 7:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2014, 9:03 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,710
I still really, really want this one built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2014, 6:05 PM
Spaceman Spaceman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 417
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
I still really, really want this one built.
Waller Center, now the Fairmont...This part of DT is having a problem with large projects..It is obvious when viewed from I 35..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2014, 8:48 PM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
7th Gen Central Texan
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 3,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaceman View Post
Waller Center, now the Fairmont...This part of DT is having a problem with large projects..It is obvious when viewed from I 35..
Both of those projects are still in the Waller Creek 100 year floodplain, technically.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2014, 3:56 AM
Homecreek Homecreek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 115
Well I think this actually might get started. The City's permit site has "Trenching and Conduit Plans for Relocation of Overhead Lines along Red River" which were approved last month and I saw some work being done on the north end of the lot. The first attachment shows Manchester Texas Financial as the developer. SPL-SP-2013-0273DS_0~001.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2014, 4:14 AM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
7th Gen Central Texan
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 3,150
I'm just not all that worried about this project. My confidence hasn't wavered yet. I just think there are factors we don't know about that are delaying it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2014, 6:38 AM
Digatisdi's Avatar
Digatisdi Digatisdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Downtown Austin
Posts: 415
I agree. I'm nearly 100% positive they're waiting for the Waller Creek Tunnel to be either complete or near complete, especially because if you look at the most recent updates on construction it requires nightly closures of Cesar Chavez and Red River streets.

Plus, the fact that the Marriott is essentially booked solid for conferences until... What was it? 2020? shows me there's a good enough market for a foray by Fairmont.

But honestly I can't deny my wishful thinking could be clouding my judgement because I remember my first time at a Fairmont was Christmas Day in Bermuda and it was absolutely wonderful--flawless and every stay in a Fairmont hotel after that has more than exceeded my expectations, and I'd love to see the Fairmont brand in Austin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2014, 7:18 PM
bigdogc's Avatar
bigdogc bigdogc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homecreek View Post
Well I think this actually might get started. The City's permit site has "Trenching and Conduit Plans for Relocation of Overhead Lines along Red River" which were approved last month and I saw some work being done on the north end of the lot. The first attachment shows Manchester Texas Financial as the developer. SPL-SP-2013-0273DS_0~001.
I can confirm, I leave for work and pass by this every day around 845am. I always see 4-5 construction workers in the lot/alley.

In due time.. I hope!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2014, 7:41 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin,TX<-->Dripping Springs,TX<-->Birmingham, AL<-->Warm Springs,GA
Posts: 57,205
El Nino is supposed to be starting up again, and that usually sets up rainy conditions for us. This article below says it could be a particularly strong one on the level of the one we had in 1998, and there were some floods that year. I remember us getting 10 to 12 inches of rain that fall and me having to sweep the water away from our house with it pouring down rain.

http://kxan.com/2014/03/06/here-come...-weather-woes/
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2014, 7:49 AM
Digatisdi's Avatar
Digatisdi Digatisdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Downtown Austin
Posts: 415
On the plus side it might pull us out of drought for a bit... On the downside is of course the probable flooding will have on residents and construction projects, so with this info I wouldn't be surprised if they wait until the tunnel is online. Thanks for the link, Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2014, 9:25 AM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
7th Gen Central Texan
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 3,150
Please God, let us get a strong El Nino and some big time rain events this Fall/Winter.

Farmer's Almanac predicted a very wet winter for us. Maybe they were off by a few months.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2014, 3:37 PM
MightyYoda MightyYoda is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 445
The weird part about our current conditions is that we aren't in a drought regarding plants and such, but our lake levels are still so low because a lot of the rain we have received over the last 6 months wasn't further to the west. We have actually been at or above precipitation averages the last couple of years I believe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2014, 11:13 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by MightyYoda View Post
The weird part about our current conditions is that we aren't in a drought regarding plants and such, but our lake levels are still so low because a lot of the rain we have received over the last 6 months wasn't further to the west. We have actually been at or above precipitation averages the last couple of years I believe.
While its true we have been at or above average for yearly rainfall the past 2 years, when you have 2 to 3 months of bone dry weather than a month or two of flooding, it does little to help even the soil moisture let alone the lake levels. This winter is ranked as the 4th driest on record. What soil moisture that was replenished with the floods this past October is gone. We need the rainfall to be distributed throughout the year so considering we recieved nearly half our annual rainfall last year in one month to push us over our average is just a number and really doesn't take into account how abnormally long the dry periods have become. Also people forget that when we have a ton of rain fall in a short amount of time, most of that runs off before really soaking into the ground. Another thing to remember is only pockets of Central Texas ended up at or above average, that includes our two official recording areas but the majority of the region did not fare so well.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2014, 9:03 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin,TX<-->Dripping Springs,TX<-->Birmingham, AL<-->Warm Springs,GA
Posts: 57,205
We really need more frequent average rains to get us back to where we need to be rather than huge floods. The way I heard it described, which made some sense, was imagine taking a bone dry sponge, all hard and dry, and dunking it into a sink basin very fast and then pulling it back out. The sponge would be wet but wouldn't have had time to soak up a lot of water. That's what those huge rains do. We might get a ton of rain, but most of it just becomes runoff. That's why it floods in the first place. The ground can't soak up the water fast enough, so it just runs off. A slower rain of 10 to 12 inches over 2 weeks would be more what we'd need and would end our drought. I remember back in 2007 we had rain like that where the lakes were actually above flood stage. I remember it raining here nearly every day for 2 weeks. It was incredible. It wasn't even heavy rain, just slow steady rain. Of course if you get a heavy rain like we had back in October right on top of the lake it would simply fill the lake. It's when we get it over dry land that it just runs off and also evaporates before it can reach the lakes.
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2014, 3:41 PM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 1,962
By the way, there's a huge tent on the Fairmont lot right now, so yeah, all of that activity we saw was for SXSW.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2014, 7:25 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,838
That's a great analogy Kevin.

If im not mistaken, MTV's Woody Awards will be on that site as it has been for the past couple of years. Lets hope they have to find a new spot next year.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:42 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.