HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3761  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2015, 3:38 PM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
MTO has a plan to upgrade 11 to a full freeway eventually, but most of it doesn't really need to be done. The highway barely needs a second carriageway north of Huntsville, yet alone a freeway designation. That said, the elimination of at grade intersections up to Huntsville may be worth exploring as the highway is generally fairly busy until that point. None of it is really gaining any funding however as its not that busy of a road overall and the at grade intersections that do exist are low traffic and create few operational or safety issues.

What really needs to be done on 11 is upgrade the RIRO portion, especially south of Orillia. The stretch from Barrie to Orillia is pushing 50,000 AADT on an at grade road, its insane. Easily the most substandard road in the province, it needs to be upgraded to a 6 lane freeway very soon.
Agreed Barrie to Orillia badly needs upgrading to 6 lanes as a freeway, and Orillia to Gravenhurst to 4 lanes as a freeway (I know they are planning for 6 but 4 is probably sufficient for now - AADT there about 25,000 to 30,000).

From Bracebridge to Huntsville, the AADT is generally around 20,000. While most of the intersections are fairly low-traffic entrances, there are a couple that are quite heavily used and a couple more on curves that are quite dangerous.

On the other section filled with at-grade intersections (Powassan to Callander), the AADT is about 10,000. It doesn't work too badly there, since the busiest intersection (Highway 534) is already an interchange. That said, that is a fairly easy section to reconfigure, as it already has a parallel service road for most of it.
     
     
  #3762  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2015, 4:07 PM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post




There are no cities of 160k in NB. Moncton is the closest at 146K. Despite this, we have approximately 750 km of fully grade separated and limited access freeways in the province.

I agree that northern Ontario has been severely shortchanged in terms of freeway construction. Highway 17 should be divided all the way from Ottawa to Sault Ste Marie. The 400 should be completed to Sudbury. Highway 11 should be divided all the way north to New Liskeard. In some ways this should be considered an act of nation building. Regardless of what the AADT is now, you need these roads to stimulate economic activity. If you want the near north to prosper, you have to give them the tools to do so.

Ideally, Highway 11 should be divided the whole way to Thunder Bay and then on to the Manitoba border.
Regarding the northern highways (traffic counts are extrapolated to 2015, most recent data is from 2010):

* Highway 17 is very busy through the Ottawa Valley as far as about Petawawa and is IMO one of the most dangerous highways in Ontario. It badly needs upgrading. AADT in that section is generally about 15,000 from Arnprior to Renfrew and about 8,000 to 12,000 beyond Renfrew. Since nearly every intersection is signalized there, a full freeway would be necessary there.

* Beyond Chalk River to Mattawa, traffic drops greatly, so that it is generally about 3,000 to 4,000. There are no problem intersections in that section either. That is definitely nice from a nation-building perspective, but not necessary from a traffic perspective.

* From Mattawa to North Bay, traffic slowly increases east to west. In the sections near Mattawa, AADT is generally about 5,000, which rises to nearly 10,000 approaching North Bay. I think the time has come to start building the freeway working east (since there are a couple problem intersections there as well), although only the first section is warranted at this time. In addition, the first 2 lanes of the Mattawa bypass (with at-grade intersections) are necessary now as well, due to a difficult descent for trucks and a tough corner in the centre of town.

* From North Bay to Sudbury, traffic is quite high. AADT is generally around 10,000 from North Bay to Sturgeon Falls, between 6,000 and 8,000 from Sturgeon Falls to Wahnapitae, and about 15,000 past Coniston to the bypass turn. The western section is under study, but the eastern section will be a difficult one due to First Nations issues as it is entirely on a First Nations reserve, plus the terrain between Sturgeon Falls and North Bay is as unforgiving as it gets.

* I believe the Sudbury bypass is to be twinned concurrently with the last section of Highway 69/400 (they pushed that back due to a change in plans and opposition to the previous plan). AADT on the bypass is between 8,000 and 13,000. The section from Lively to Whitefish is already a freeway, and from Whitefish to Nairn Centre is planned. However, as far as Highway 6 (Espanola/Manitoulin turn) is very busy (AADT about 12,000).

* I am less familiar with west of there, but I do know from limited experience the terrain between Espanola and Desbarats the terrain is much more forgiving. Traffic isn't as high there (AADT about 5,000 to 7,000) so interchanges wouldn't be necessary at this stage except at a few busy spots.

* Desbarats to the eastern end of Sault Ste. Marie is a 4-lane highway, mostly at grade with a few overpasses. 638 (Echo Bay) needs an interchange though I believe. One thing I would change is the speed limit should be 100 km/h instead of 90 km/h.

* As for 11 North, it is fairly busy and well used by trucks (due to the flatter terrain along its route beyond New Liskeard) between Highway 101 and North Bay. However, west of Cochrane, and especially between Hearst and Nipigon, it is not busy at all (AADT less than 2,000). Although 11 is one extremely long highway, it tends to function as three separate routes: one from Barrie to Matheson (a major north-south arterial), one from Swastika to Nipigon (where it and 66 tend to function together) and one from Shabaqua to Rainy River (as a southern route for areas south of 17).

* The problem with 11 beyond North Bay to New Liskeard: that section would be very expensive to construct it given the traffic counts (AADT 4,000 to 6,000).
     
     
  #3763  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2015, 4:16 PM
Mister F Mister F is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by toaster View Post
My perception of why Ontario is spending so much on these freeways to Sudbury and North Bay is to encourage growth in areas north of Barrie, and to provide a safe alternative to air travel for those in the North.
If Sudbury, a city of 160k+ people, was in any other province, and was about 380 km away from the biggest city in that province, it would be connected by freeway without question by now. Only in Ontario would we be questioning a freeway to a city of that size. Could you imagine a city of 160k in Manitoba, New Brunswick, Saskatchewan, etc., without a freeway?
A safe alternative to flying used to exist but we abandoned it - the rail lines. We're now putting billions into a less safe alternative when maintaining and upgrading the existing infrastructure would have been cheaper. Odd priorities we have.

Internationally, it's quite rare for a city of 160,000, being 380 km from the closest major city (or 290 km to a comparable city like Barrie), to have a freeway built to it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post

I agree that northern Ontario has been severely shortchanged in terms of freeway construction. Highway 17 should be divided all the way from Ottawa to Sault Ste Marie. The 400 should be completed to Sudbury. Highway 11 should be divided all the way north to New Liskeard. In some ways this should be considered an act of nation building. Regardless of what the AADT is now, you need these roads to stimulate economic activity. If you want the near north to prosper, you have to give them the tools to do so.

Ideally, Highway 11 should be divided the whole way to Thunder Bay and then on to the Manitoba border.
For a little perspective, a comparable divided highway doesn't exist anywhere in the world. Northern Ontario isn't being shortchanged, it's getting multiple times more highway spending per capita than the south.
     
     
  #3764  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2015, 5:28 PM
hipster duck's Avatar
hipster duck hipster duck is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister F View Post
A safe alternative to flying used to exist but we abandoned it - the rail lines. We're now putting billions into a less safe alternative when maintaining and upgrading the existing infrastructure would have been cheaper. Odd priorities we have.
I would argue our cross-country rail priorities are in the right place.

We have decided that our long-distance, inter-continental rail traffic will be directed to massive freight trains rather than passenger service. It makes a lot more sense environmentally, economically and from a safety perspective to remove 1,000 container trucks from the road than 1,000 cars.

It's difficult to optimize the rail network to serve both freight and passenger needs. In China, one of the purposes of building a huge HSR network was to add a parallel passenger network and relegate the old network for freight. But in so many different ways, we are not China!

There's only a handful of places - almost all of them in Ontario and Quebec - where I think that prioritizing freight over passenger rail was a mistake.
     
     
  #3765  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2015, 7:15 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by toaster View Post
My perception of why Ontario is spending so much on these freeways to Sudbury and North Bay is to encourage growth in areas north of Barrie, and to provide a safe alternative to air travel for those in the North.
If Sudbury, a city of 160k+ people, was in any other province, and was about 380 km away from the biggest city in that province, it would be connected by freeway without question by now. Only in Ontario would we be questioning a freeway to a city of that size. Could you imagine a city of 160k in Manitoba, New Brunswick, Saskatchewan, etc., without a freeway?
Actually, Calgary & Edmonton don't have a full freeway connecting them. While it's four lanes there's some level crossings. I don't think there's any full freeways between cities anywhere in Canada west of Ontario but I may be wrong.
     
     
  #3766  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2015, 7:54 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,831
BC-1 is a full freeway up to Kamloops I believe. BC-99 which meets I-5 at the border is also a full freeway.

AB-1 heading into the rockies is a full freeway as well, though it doesn't really run between cities.
     
     
  #3767  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2015, 10:19 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
The Trans-Canada in BC is full freeway from Horseshoe Bay in West Vancouver until Kamloops.
     
     
  #3768  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2015, 11:32 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is online now
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,268
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
     
     
  #3769  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2015, 11:37 PM
Franco401 Franco401 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Fredericton
Posts: 1,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker View Post
TCH and the Veteran's in Spaniard's Bay, right?
     
     
  #3770  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2015, 11:41 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is online now
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,268
I don't have a fucking clue.

Googled "Roaches Line" and I get Highway 70 up to Bay Roberts. That connects with the TCH here, and zoomed in it appears to be the right spot:

__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
     
     
  #3771  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2015, 12:30 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 39,065
What Northern Ontario needs isn't a full divided, controlled access highway. We simply need a safer one. The common perception is that that's a four-lane, divided highway with only interchanges.

Simply adding a median, eliminating poorly designed intersections and upgrading the busier intersections with interchanges would be enough. Some lights in key spots, some wildlife bridges, and a few more rest stations (since it's a long trip between some towns) and that would go a long way toward improving highway safety up here.

Rail would be nice but only CP Rail connects Thunder Bay to the east now and they refuse to allow passenger service on their lines, so that's not an option to connect us to Ontario anymore. The CN line that connects us to Winnipeg goes through the US so passenger travel won't be easy. The only reason trains come here anymore is to export grain and import oil.
     
     
  #3772  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2015, 12:33 AM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is online now
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,268
When I moved West the... second?... time, I drove from St. John's to Kenora. Montreal (the elevated part) and northern Ontario were my favourite bits.

It's amazing how big Ontario is. I was used to just squishing the whole west. I thought I could've been in Calgary by the end of the day after leaving Sudbury.
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
     
     
  #3773  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2015, 12:56 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 39,065
You can't even get to Winnipeg by the end of the day after leaving Sudbury. It's 19 hours away!

Northern Ontario is so big that when I go to Winnipeg and people ask if I drove there, I say "I flew, but it's only an 8 hour drive" and they laugh at the "only 8 hours" part. Every other city is over 12 hours away.
     
     
  #3774  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2015, 5:04 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-paladin View Post
The Trans-Canada in BC is full freeway from Horseshoe Bay in West Vancouver until Kamloops.
Well, it is if you use the Coquihalla which technically isn't the TCH.
     
     
  #3775  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2015, 12:10 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,797
News article about Hwy 69 in Ontario

Quote:
....

Del Duca said the new target date for completion is between 2019 and 2021.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/sudbury/hw...or-first-nations-conversations-1.2985046
     
     
  #3776  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2015, 12:31 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,831
well surprise surprise. As if anyone didn't see it coming. And to think just a few weeks ago the MPP candidates for Sudbury were flinging out promises of 2017 still..
     
     
  #3777  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2015, 3:34 PM
dmuzika dmuzika is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
Actually, Calgary & Edmonton don't have a full freeway connecting them. While it's four lanes there's some level crossings. I don't think there's any full freeways between cities anywhere in Canada west of Ontario but I may be wrong.
The QE2 has some level crossings, but they are a hand-full of minor, country roads between Airdrie and Red Deer. The province has been in the process of closing the intersections. All highways (primary and secondary) and town access routes have interchanges.
     
     
  #3778  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2015, 3:40 PM
dmuzika dmuzika is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
Well, it is if you use the Coquihalla which technically isn't the TCH.
IMO, BC missed the boat by not designating the Coquihalla Hwy as TCH 1 (and subsiquently renumbering TCH 1 between Hope & Kamloops) when it was opened in the mid 1980s. Despite the change in highway numbering between West Vancouver and Kamloops, the freeway is a continous roadway where TCH 1 leaves the freeway at Hope (Exit 170) and Kamloops (Exit 362).
     
     
  #3779  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2015, 4:06 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmuzika View Post
IMO, BC missed the boat by not designating the Coquihalla Hwy as TCH 1 (and subsiquently renumbering TCH 1 between Hope & Kamloops) when it was opened in the mid 1980s. Despite the change in highway numbering between West Vancouver and Kamloops, the freeway is a continous roadway where TCH 1 leaves the freeway at Hope (Exit 170) and Kamloops (Exit 362).
Now that the tolls have been removed, the numbering scheme is really outdated in that part of BC. I do understand the hesitation to redesignate the highways in the area.

Perhaps the old alignment of Highway 1 could become a Hwy 1A or something. (So long as its not designated as a suffix of 97, there are enough Hwy 97's in BC).
     
     
  #3780  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2015, 4:41 PM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
well surprise surprise. As if anyone didn't see it coming. And to think just a few weeks ago the MPP candidates for Sudbury were flinging out promises of 2017 still..
That is still probably generous, due to obstructionism by First Nations leaders...
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:48 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.