Quote:
Originally Posted by Bayside
I drove down Dauphin Street this morning and see that with the exception of the Mardi Gras bar (or whatever the name of the troublesome bar in the news is) there are no bars or eateries between Franklin and Warren streets. There are, though, several condominiums. I see no reason to infiltrate noisy late night bars and bands into this small neighborhood. Between Warren and Broad (Wintzel's area) you find another district distinctly different from the one between Royal and Franklin streets.
I say let the people who live in the four-block area between Franklin and Warren live in peace, and encourage more residential to the north and south of this area. Nimsjus, take a closer look next time you are downtown and let me know what you think.
|
If you take a look at the area you are discussing, the only successful businesses are Alabama Music Box (which was formerly the super successful Soul Kitchen-one of the city's best live music venues) and The Corner Bar (which just expanded due to its popularity). While the corner bar is new, the other bar has been something successful for going on 15 years now without creating an issue. Now take a look at the residential in that section. The only residential projects of any substance in that stretch are Clarkson Townhomes (which is probably my favorite) and Mattress Factory. Both of those have no neighbors because they take up basically the whole block or have empty space between them and their neighbors. That was smart of those developers to ensure that they could create the most quiet/privacy that can be expected when living downtown. The residents there are not complaining. I think that shows that things can coexist when done properly. The reason that particular stretch is uninhabited retail and residential wise has nothing to do with the bars. Noone will touch that stretch (retail/commercial/residential) because Catholic Services has a homeless clinic and pharmacy there. People tend not to like homeless people congregating in front of their business/residence. That stretch will remain dead until it moves(which has been proposed by the Downtown Alliance and the Archdiocese). The few bars that are there now at least keep Dauphin as a semi-continuous stretch of food/bars/galleries/etc. I want downtown residential to take off as much as the next guy, but not at the expense of our existing, hard-earned, entertainment district. This seems an awful lot like the bridge deal to me. Kill/limit your existing, thriving, cruise/port/historic downtown with a bridge when there are other solutions. Why force residential on Dauphin (potentially destroying/limiting the 2 decades worth of work to create a reason to come downtown) when there are blocks of rotting dilapidated structures, empty parking lots, and prexisting residential structures that would be suitable for downtown residential? I agree with you bay that the area is not exactly thriving, but I think this move could set a dangerous precedent that could be taken way to far. Dauphin to me is for entertainment and has been for about 20 years now. If you choose to make it your home, then you know that going in. In my opinion we shouldnt risk messing up that established entertainment district for a single residents compaint about a single bar, especially when there are so many other options to increase residential living downtown. Just my take though. It appears most hear think we should run off all the bars in favor of residents. I'm just not sure people will want to live down there if you take away all of tha kind of stuff.