HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast > Atlanta


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3741  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2011, 8:19 PM
echinatl echinatl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 699
MARTA to spend 117 mil on new train tech.
http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/mart...17-811682.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3742  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2011, 8:24 PM
mike1986 mike1986 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by echinatl View Post
MARTA to spend 117 mil on new train tech.
http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/mart...17-811682.html
I wish they would spend that money on modernizing some of their stations... like getting rid of the shed-like Peachtree Center street level entrances, updating Five Points, Midtown, and Arts Center stations at street level, etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3743  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2011, 8:27 PM
echinatl echinatl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1986 View Post
I wish they would spend that money on modernizing some of their stations... like getting rid of the shed-like Peachtree Center street level entrances, updating Five Points, Midtown, and Arts Center stations at street level, etc.
Better lighting, more police presence on and off the train is what I'd like to see. Immediately followed by those types of updates.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3744  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2011, 9:59 PM
Pessimistic Observer Pessimistic Observer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 267
personally the only upgrade i would like from marta right now is an assurance that there not going to cut service this fall
if only pigs could fly
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3745  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2011, 12:09 AM
Pompuss's Avatar
Pompuss Pompuss is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Atlanta/Jacksonville
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1986 View Post
I wish they would spend that money on modernizing some of their stations... like getting rid of the shed-like Peachtree Center street level entrances, updating Five Points, Midtown, and Arts Center stations at street level, etc.
Just out of curiosity, what kind of updates would you want with Five Points?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3746  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2011, 11:07 PM
RobMidtowner's Avatar
RobMidtowner RobMidtowner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The "A"
Posts: 1,049
I'd be happy if they actually cleaned up the stations. It's really pathetic when you go to the airport and smell urine in the elevator before your trip and a week later in the same elevator when you return. I mean, just cleaning it once week would be an improvement.
__________________
"I'm a little verklempt..Talk amongst yourselves..I will give you a topic: The Holy Roman Empire was neither holy nor Roman nor an empire. Discuss."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3747  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2011, 2:52 AM
echinatl echinatl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pompuss View Post
Just out of curiosity, what kind of updates would you want with Five Points?
I'd like them to build their HQ's on top of it. Then have 1 cop at every corner 24/7, have at least 2 cops walking around inside. Focus on better lighting, maybe some interesting items like at the airport, and keep it spotless and smelling nice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3748  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2011, 1:21 PM
BlindFatSnake BlindFatSnake is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1986 View Post
I wish they would spend that money on modernizing some of their stations... like getting rid of the shed-like Peachtree Center street level entrances, updating Five Points, Midtown, and Arts Center stations at street level, etc.
The upgrades follow a 2009 train crash in Washington, D.C. that killed nine, prompting federal recommendations nationwide to check train signal systems. A MARTA spokeswoman wrote in an e-mail that MARTA began planning the overhaul of the aging system three years before the Washington crash, but that the overhaul will help satisfy federal safety recommendations, too.

I'll put safety (and saving human lives) over cosmetic upgrades any day of the week... Let's make the system "crash-proof", and then start working on beautifying the stations, which I agree, need some cosmetic work.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3749  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2011, 3:09 AM
PedestriAnne PedestriAnne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 85
I can think of about 100 things I'd like to see MARTA do to improve the stations cosmetically and functionally, rather than spend that much money on something sort of "invisible" like safety enhancements to the track circuits BUT:

As much as people run MARTA down now ("It doesn't go anywhere/Everyone there is corrupt/It's dangerous/It's run inefficiently/It's a waste of money...") can you even imagine what would happen if they had an accident and four or five people were killed? Not only would the professional MARTA-bashers never, ever let anyone forget it, the agency would be financially crippled after paying multi-million dollar settlements, fines and attorney's fees.

On the other hand, it's hard for one train to run into the back of another one with 20-minute headways
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3750  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2011, 1:32 PM
1lifealex 1lifealex is offline
AK
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 286
Well it's 15-minutes M-f from about 5 A.M. to 7 P.M. so from the Airport to Lindbergh you get a train every 7.5 minutes or so, its 20 minutes after 7 P.M. and on the weekends.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3751  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2011, 3:08 PM
jnihiser jnihiser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 302
Having lived in Boston and used the T...

I see no issue with cleanliness in Atlanta's Marta stations.

The T stations could have used a scrub down, but I've found that the vast majority of Marta stations are both spacious and clean.

I'm not arguing with the guy who smelled pee in the elevator, but only offering a counter-opinion.

To margin for a minute, has anyone else noticed how incredibly large many of our stations are on MARTA?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3752  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2011, 7:16 PM
Chris Creech's Avatar
Chris Creech Chris Creech is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1986 View Post
I wish they would spend that money on modernizing some of their stations... like getting rid of the shed-like Peachtree Center street level entrances, updating Five Points, Midtown, and Arts Center stations at street level, etc.
I guess one reason so many of the intown stations are sort of non-descript and not that attractive though is that many of them were designed to be built over.

I know there's been talk of moving the symphony hall over the arts center station, then that whole area Im sure would have incredible street scapes and landscaping. I'm pretty sure I remember at the time they were being built talk of Midtown, North Avenue and Five Points street scapes and above ground parts all being sort of "place holders" until MARTA sold the air rights. It's just a shame that's just never happened. My guess is that even if they're designed to be built over, there's probably still engineering and safety concerns and expense involved that are off putting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3753  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2011, 8:16 PM
TarHeelJ TarHeelJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by jnihiser View Post
I see no issue with cleanliness in Atlanta's Marta stations.

The T stations could have used a scrub down, but I've found that the vast majority of Marta stations are both spacious and clean.

I'm not arguing with the guy who smelled pee in the elevator, but only offering a counter-opinion.

To margin for a minute, has anyone else noticed how incredibly large many of our stations are on MARTA?
I agree...MARTA stations are much cleaner than most other rail transit stations I have experienced, Boston included. The 70's design leaves something to be desired, but I'm not sure what anyone expects. It's 70's design. MARTA barely has enough funds to operate, so I don't see a major overhaul of the station design happening anytime soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3754  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2011, 12:54 AM
Pompuss's Avatar
Pompuss Pompuss is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Atlanta/Jacksonville
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by echinatl View Post
I'd like them to build their HQ's on top of it. Then have 1 cop at every corner 24/7, have at least 2 cops walking around inside. Focus on better lighting, maybe some interesting items like at the airport, and keep it spotless and smelling nice.
Well, all that is in the works I can promise you. But saftey upgrades are happening first (next five years), then there will be cosmetic work.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3755  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2011, 3:19 AM
PedestriAnne PedestriAnne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1lifealex View Post
Well it's 15-minutes M-f from about 5 A.M. to 7 P.M. so from the Airport to Lindbergh you get a train every 7.5 minutes or so, its 20 minutes after 7 P.M. and on the weekends.
Yeah, I know. The long-headway times are when I use it the most.

I've had many episodes of sitting at Buckhead station and having two consecutive Lindbergh trains go by 15 minutes apart. Then, about five minutes later, the Airport train will finally come. That's 35 minutes of waiting for a train. Completely ridiculous. I've walked from Buckhead Station to Lindbergh in the same amount of time by cutting through Peachtree Park.

If I have to go from north of Lindbergh to south of there at night or on the weekend, I now usually catch the 110 bus from somewhere in Buckhead to Arts Center, then catch the train from there. Sometimes I'm in the mood to sit outside reading or staring at the Buckhead skyline, but most of the time it would be really cool if there was considerably more "rapid" in the "rapid transit."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3756  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2011, 1:01 PM
BlindFatSnake BlindFatSnake is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 212
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedestriAnne View Post
Yeah, I know. The long-headway times are when I use it the most.

I've had many episodes of sitting at Buckhead station and having two consecutive Lindbergh trains go by 15 minutes apart. Then, about five minutes later, the Airport train will finally come. That's 35 minutes of waiting for a train. Completely ridiculous. I've walked from Buckhead Station to Lindbergh in the same amount of time by cutting through Peachtree Park.
"
Maybe I'm reading this statement all wrong. Questions: After 7 PM the Red Line travels from N. Springs to Lindbergh? Right? Then, how can you board an "Airport" train from Buckhead after 7PM? I'm confused... Please explain.

Besides, why not just board the first train that arrives, and wait at Lindbergh. Maybe a Gold Line train - headed to the airport - will arrive sooner than later.

I'm just sayin'...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3757  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2011, 8:49 PM
shivtim's Avatar
shivtim shivtim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Midtown Atlanta
Posts: 2,479
This was just released by the ARC. It would basically consolidate metro transit under one umbrella agency, which would help coordinate service across agencies and possibly allow expansion of rail or BRT beyond Fulton and Dekalb. Fantastic idea, but the state still needs to sign off on it.



Regional Transit Committee Adopts Conceptual Legislation for Regional Transit Governance
(ATLANTA –January 26, 2011) Today, the Atlanta Regional Commission’s (ARC) Regional Transit Committee (RTC) approved conceptual legislation that provides guidelines and principals for creating an umbrella governance structure for a metro-wide, coordinated transit system.

After several years of studying the Atlanta region’s transit needs and governance structures for other metropolitan operations, the RTC determined that a model similar to the Chicago Regional Transit Authority would work well in this region. “Committee members agreed that this model seemed like the best for creating a single entity that would have the authority and the ability to plan, finance, build, own, operate and maintain cross-jurisdictional transit infrastructure and service for our region,” said Atlanta Mayor, Kasim Reed, RTC chair.

The model legislation proposed by the Regional Transit Committee is consistent with the guiding principles issued by the Joint Legislative Transit Governance Study Commission, and is meant to be an example of how a statement of regional policy might be written into law in a way that meets those guidelines.

The committee’s model legislation recognizes MARTA as the backbone of the system, while allowing it to expand rail service outside Fulton and DeKalb counties in the same way it is currently able to provide bus service. The governance structure outlined in the conceptual legislation would embrace all transit systems in the Atlanta region, such as Cobb Community Transit and Gwinnett County Transit.

Additionally, local officials have repeatedly reaffirmed a set of guiding principles or policy statements for the constitution and operation of a regional transit governance system, including:

* Unified Decision-Making – the region needs a single entity that will be able to plan, finance, build, own, operate and maintain (or contract for) cross-jurisdictional transit infrastructure and service.
* Voting Structure – in order for an entity to have voting rights in the decision-making process in the region’s transit governance structure, that entity must contribute financially to the operation of the region’s transit system.
* Proportional Representation – in addition to being required to contribute to the operational expenses of the region’s transit systems in order to vote at the regional level, the weight of an entity’s vote should be proportional to the value of its contribution to the system.

The RTC’s conceptual transit governance legislation accomplishes all of these goals, without jeopardizing existing transit funding sources or requiring changes to home-rule provisions of the Georgia Constitution to prevent local governments from operating transit systems.

“This draft legislation is intended as a statement of regional policy, and as an example of how that policy could be written into law in a way that meets the stated guidelines put forth by the General Assembly, through the draft report of its Joint Legislative Transit Governance Study Commission,” said Mayor Reed. “The action by the RTC today is an important step forward and a sign of regional unity in our desire to create a truly world-class transit system for metro Atlanta.”

Later in the day, the ARC board voted unanimously on a resolution in support of the RTC’s passage of the conceptual regional transit governance legislation. ARC will work to assist the Regional Transit Committee in transmitting the legislative framework to the Joint Legislative Transit Governance Study Commission.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3758  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2011, 6:30 AM
PedestriAnne PedestriAnne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlindFatSnake View Post
Maybe I'm reading this statement all wrong. Questions: After 7 PM the Red Line travels from N. Springs to Lindbergh? Right? Then, how can you board an "Airport" train from Buckhead after 7PM? I'm confused... Please explain.

Besides, why not just board the first train that arrives, and wait at Lindbergh. Maybe a Gold Line train - headed to the airport - will arrive sooner than later.

I'm just sayin'...
Well, the first time this happened wasn't long after I'd moved back here, so I wasn't aware that the Red Line only runs between North Springs and Lindbergh at night.

I got to Buckhead station and waited 15 minutes for an Airport train. I saw that it was going only as far as Lindbergh, so I let it go by, thinking that the next one would go all the way to to the airport. But, when another train came by with "Lindbergh" on the sign I figured out that I had to go to Lindbergh to get past Lindbergh. I think I was aware that you now have to get on a Doraville train and transfer at Lindbergh to go to North Springs at night (or is it the other way around?), but it had somehow gotten past me for a while that you also have catch Airport trains at Lindbergh at night now.

Anyway, I'd get on the second Lindbergh train that came 15 minutes after the first one, get off at Lindbergh and see the same people who'd gotten on the first one at Buckhead STILL standing on the platform at Lindbergh, waiting for an Airport train. Then, about five minutes later, the Airport train would finally come.

So, no matter whether I'd gotten on the first train or the second one at Buckhead, I couldn't have gotten any farther than Lindbergh until a third one (the one going all the way to the Airport) showed up, which was 35 minutes after I'd first arrived at Buckhead.

I thought this was an aberration the first time, but it happened several times during the summer, which is when I gave up and started doing half the trip on the 110 bus.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3759  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2011, 6:56 PM
RobMidtowner's Avatar
RobMidtowner RobMidtowner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The "A"
Posts: 1,049
You should have taken the first train to Lindbergh because from there you can catch an Airport train coming from either North Springs or Doraville.
__________________
"I'm a little verklempt..Talk amongst yourselves..I will give you a topic: The Holy Roman Empire was neither holy nor Roman nor an empire. Discuss."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3760  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2011, 2:26 AM
PedestriAnne PedestriAnne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobMidtowner View Post
You should have taken the first train to Lindbergh because from there you can catch an Airport train coming from either North Springs or Doraville.
That's what's supposed to happen. But, far too often for my taste, this is what was actually happening:

1. Get to Buckhead station, wait 15 minutes, get on Lindbergh train
2. Get to Lindbergh, wait another 15 minutes only to have another Lindbergh train show up
3. Wait another five minutes or so and finally get on the Airport train.

I just don't think it's reasonable to spend half an hour traveling no farther than the distance between Buckhead and Lindbergh. This doesn't happen every time I try to get from Buckhead back to downtown (or SoNo ) at night, but it's often enough that I pretty much expect it now.

Maybe it's me. I seem to have a talent for arriving at stations as the train is leaving so that I have to wait the entire interval between trains.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast > Atlanta
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:31 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.