HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3741  
Old Posted May 12, 2008, 11:31 PM
a chicago bearcat's Avatar
a chicago bearcat a chicago bearcat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 328
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdrianXSands View Post
the helmut jahn sro is expanding all the way to division and then wrapping around the corner to cleveland ave... i didn't know it was already under construction though. hmmm

also, on the SOUTH WEST corner, there is that atrociously ugly, horrifyingly bad residential development u/c
http://www.parksideofoldtown.com/



u/c:


(bad architecture: ruining chicago one god awful development at a time)
I would agree if you said it wasn't great architecture. But this is much better if you take it into context that this will be a background development to the other much better developments that will be filling in this part of the city in the next 7 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3742  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 12:15 AM
Jibba's Avatar
Jibba Jibba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,939



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3743  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 12:57 AM
killaviews's Avatar
killaviews killaviews is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 492
^^^ Great shots, I'm really excited about this bridge and the expansion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3744  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 2:18 AM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,492
Re Reg expansion:

I would say that the best uses of the Bruatlist style has to be libraries for major universities. Not only is the Reg super dope, but so is the Weese designed one at Northwestern, they are both incredibly awesome!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3745  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 3:17 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Gourmet version of Taste planned for fall
By Monica Eng and Phil Vettel | Tribune reporter
9:06 PM CDT, May 12, 2008
Attention foodies: Chicago plans to use its top chefs to show the world that there's more to the city's cuisines than the Taste of Chicago. The city can dish up gourmet flair too.

Chicago Gourmet, billed as "a celebration of food and wine," is expected to feature several of the city's nationally known chefs when it runs from Sept. 26-28 in Millennium Park. The event is sponsored by the City of Chicago and the Illinois Restaurant Association.

Mayor Richard Daley apparently wants a gourmet version of Taste, one that will show off Chicago as a world-class culinary destination.
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3746  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 3:22 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,561
Nichols Bridgeway

May 12, 2008













Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3747  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 3:53 AM
neverdone's Avatar
neverdone neverdone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
Re Reg expansion:

I would say that the best uses of the Bruatlist style has to be libraries for major universities. Not only is the Reg super dope, but so is the Weese designed one at Northwestern, they are both incredibly awesome!
I couldn't agree with you more, Nowhereman. I love both of these buildings, but I believe they were designed by Walter Netsch and not Harry Weese. Either way, that addition, although a bit strange, is very respectful of the existing library

I do hope that underground building doesn't become a trend (Children's Museum, Regenstein addition, ....)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3748  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 4:14 AM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^ Correct you are.

And, one more time for the record: Thank god Helmut's back.
__________________
"Every building is a landmark until proven otherwise." - Harry Mohr Weese

"I often say, 'Look, see, enjoy, and love.' It's a long way from looking to loving, but it's worth the effort." - Walter Andrew Netsch Jr.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3749  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 5:10 AM
BWChicago's Avatar
BWChicago BWChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 486
Netsch provided expansion blueprints when the Reg was first built; I still would much rather have seen that built, although obviously the interior plans would have to be altered considerably. But you still could have had the underground systems plus a bunch of additional user floors above. I don't see how the dome is respectful at all; nothing about it really relates to anything about the Reg or UoC for that matter. It certainly DOES relate to Jahn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3750  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 12:53 PM
Taft Taft is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 638
Metropolitan Planning Commission's take on CCM Relocation

Covered in this tribune piece:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...,1559292.story

I don't want to start a dust up around this again, but I thought their arguments against the move are some of the best I've heard. From the article:

Quote:
"We deserve better than being presented with the proposal to relocate the Chicago Children's Museum to Grant Park as a faitaccompli without the benefit of a thoughtful planning process which would have added and provided answers to many of the issues circling this controversial proposal," said the statement co-writtenby MarySue Barrett, the group's president and former top Daley aide. "In the absence of those answers and a public planning process, we cannot support this plan."
Very similar to the arguments used against the Latin School soccer field dust up in Lincoln Park. Very effective as well, in my opinion.

Taft
__________________
We are building a religion, we are making it bigger.
We are widening the corridor and adding more lanes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3751  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 2:57 PM
ChiPsy's Avatar
ChiPsy ChiPsy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdrianXSands View Post
the helmut jahn sro is expanding all the way to division and then wrapping around the corner to cleveland ave...
Adrian, are you sure that SRO is expanding? I didn't think it was, but I may have missed something.

Meanwhile, demo continues on the "Reds" (Frances Cabrini Extension) as we speak. This may be the year the CHA meets its perpetually revised transformation schedule for Cabrini -- if incessant litigation doesn't delay them again. Next up: The "Whites" (the William Green high-rises north of Division).

Scheduled for demo by September 2008:
The 2 reds (out of 5 total) that they're working on now.
2 of the 3 remaining whites (1230 N. Larrabee & 1230 N. Burling)

Scheduled for demo by September 2009:
The last 3 reds (412 W. Chicago + 364 & 365 W. Oak)
The last white (660 W. Division)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3752  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 4:35 PM
Tom Servo's Avatar
Tom Servo Tom Servo is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiPsy View Post
Adrian, are you sure that SRO is expanding? I didn't think it was, but I may have missed something.
that's what i heard. and murphy/jahn has a model of the entire project sitting in their office. and a full set of drawings for it apparently. and i was told the phase 2 (?) would happen in 09. i hope the whole thing gets built because it's awesome.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3753  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 4:54 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,159
Does the Art Institute bridge look like a waterslide to anyone else?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3754  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 5:23 PM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,492
Quote:
Originally Posted by neverdone View Post
I couldn't agree with you more, Nowhereman. I love both of these buildings, but I believe they were designed by Walter Netsch and not Harry Weese.
DAMN IT! I always do that, Honte has told me 1000 times that its a Netsch, but I always mess it up. I knew I was doing it too when I wrote that! GRRR. I think Weese did the stuff up in Madison and that might be why I always mess it up. Whatever, I fail...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3755  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 6:27 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^ Not a big deal!
__________________
"Every building is a landmark until proven otherwise." - Harry Mohr Weese

"I often say, 'Look, see, enjoy, and love.' It's a long way from looking to loving, but it's worth the effort." - Walter Andrew Netsch Jr.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3756  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 7:15 PM
cbotnyse cbotnyse is offline
Chicago Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: River North, Chicago
Posts: 1,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaron38 View Post
Does the Art Institute bridge look like a waterslide to anyone else?
yeah I'm not really sold on it yet. I guess I am comparing it to Gehry's bridge in my mind. I'm sure it will be great when completed, and something the area sorely needs. Anything that makes GP more pedestrian friendly is OK with me.

Now we need some bridges over (or under I guess) LSD at the fountain.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3757  
Old Posted May 13, 2008, 7:57 PM
ethereal_reality's Avatar
ethereal_reality ethereal_reality is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lafayette/West Lafayette IN, Purdue U.
Posts: 16,493
I love the idea of the bridge, but
I don't know why Piano chose a curved bottom.
There are no curves anywhere else in his design.

And yes...it DOES look like a waterslide (albeit a boring one at that angle)
I also read a post on a Trib blog where someone compared it to a gutter.

I think it will be fine once people are using it...and enjoying the sightlines.

Last edited by ethereal_reality; May 13, 2008 at 9:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3758  
Old Posted May 14, 2008, 10:27 AM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,423
Lincolnwood Purple Hotel

Quote:
http://www.suntimes.com/business/roe...eder14.article

Barr's double trouble
REAL ESTATE

....PURPLE POWER: The buyers of the shuttered Purple Hotel in Lincolnwood have submitted plans for the property to village officials. Inland Real Estate Acquisitions Inc. and TMK Development Ltd. have proposed up to 800,000 square feet of new construction at 4500 W. Touhy, near Touhy and Lincoln. Included are 350 hotel rooms, 100,000 square feet of stores and restaurants, a Lucky Strike bowling alley, a movie theater, about 200 condos or apartments and 40,000 square feet of office space.
..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3759  
Old Posted May 14, 2008, 2:43 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by ethereal_reality View Post
I also read a post on a Trib blog where someone compared it to a gutter.
Ouch. And I thought I was being overly harsh with the waterslide dig...
It'll look fine when it's got railings on it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3760  
Old Posted May 14, 2008, 6:04 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by ethereal_reality View Post
I love the idea of the bridge, but
I don't know why Piano chose a curved bottom.
There are no curves anywhere else in his design.
I think it's supposed to look like a boat's hull.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:40 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.