HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3681  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2020, 12:21 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,736
Yup. It’s like saying a Honda Civic costs $90,000 because you have to include 10 years of insurance, gas, and maintenance. Are those costs related? Yes. But nobody would say it costs that much. They would say that it’s $25k, because that’s how much it costs to buy.

Strict construction costs here are still $1billion. $2.32 billion once you add property, design, and vehicle costs. That’s the comparable cost.

The comparable cost of the Kitchener LRT is $818 million, which should be compared to the $2.32 billion. Hamilton makes sense to be more expensive as the project is getting built a decade later, which with construction cost inflation at ~5%, accounts for a huge chunk of that difference, and for which the Hamilton LRT has always been a more complex project through a denser urban environment with much larger property requirements and infrastructure needs (longwood rd rebuild, rail grade separation in the east end, etc.). A big reason Waterloo was so cheap is because half the line runs in a rail corridor with no demolition costs and much cheaper construction forms. Hamilton doesn’t have that luxury.

The comparable should be Hurontario which has similar infrastructure needs and a similar timeline and costs come out quite similar.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3682  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2020, 12:29 PM
HamiltonBoyInToronto HamiltonBoyInToronto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 478
This entire fiasco is only happening because this is Hamilton...there are people out there ...in this city and outside this city ...that, for some reason, just don't like Hamilton.... We have been cut at the knees for decades now by politicians and self serving citizens...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3683  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2020, 3:19 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,397
While I don't disagree with you about opinions of Hamilton -- which seem to be changing for the better, slowly... the "self serving citizens" not so much -- transit projects often get a rough ride, some deservedly so but even the ones that make sense from an economic perspective have detractors.

And it seems like it's the first steps that are the most difficult in medium-sized cities planning on moving beyond a basic bus network to something higher order. KW's system had its critics, London's BRT plans have had a rough ride, the Hurontario LRT will stop at Brampton's border because its council disagreed with the plan. Even Ottawa has had its debates over rail (including a cancelled project) despite high transit use and decades running a successful transitway system that was clearly beyond its capacity.

I don't think Hamilton is that different.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3684  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2020, 4:00 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,736
For comparison, the Hurontario LRT final cost is $4.6 billion, for a 19km line. That includes construction, financing, operation, and maintenance for 30 years. My understanding is that this cost includes the same stuff that the $3.7 billion number for Hamilton does.

So that's $242 million per km of LRT. Hamilton LRT at $3.7 billion is $284 million / km. Very comparable, especially since Hamilton is through a much more complex urban environment, will have higher frequencies and ridership, and is subject to several more years of inflation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3685  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2020, 8:24 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,397
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
For comparison, the Hurontario LRT final cost is $4.6 billion, for a 19km line. That includes construction, financing, operation, and maintenance for 30 years. My understanding is that this cost includes the same stuff that the $3.7 billion number for Hamilton does.

So that's $242 million per km of LRT. Hamilton LRT at $3.7 billion is $284 million / km. Very comparable, especially since Hamilton is through a much more complex urban environment, will have higher frequencies and ridership, and is subject to several more years of inflation.
That is exactly the kind of comparison people need to be making.

These things aren't built in their own bubbles. There will be differences due to design issues specific to a route (bridges and tunnels, older infrastructure needing to be moved and replaced beneath which is probably more of a factor in Hamilton than Mississauga, etc.) but for systems built within a few years of each other the costs for things like an average station should be largely similar for different lines, costs of the tracks and track bed, the electrical service and signals, etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3686  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2020, 8:29 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,736
I recall the same issue with the gas plants scandal back in the day - the AG report included 30 years of higher operating costs for the plants that replaced the cancelled plant, which inflated the cancellation cost number to $1 billion. Sure those costs will occur - but are operating costs really fair to include? Most people separate capital and operating costs for a reason.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3687  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2020, 12:01 AM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
For comparison, the Hurontario LRT final cost is $4.6 billion, for a 19km line. That includes construction, financing, operation, and maintenance for 30 years. My understanding is that this cost includes the same stuff that the $3.7 billion number for Hamilton does.

So that's $242 million per km of LRT. Hamilton LRT at $3.7 billion is $284 million / km. Very comparable, especially since Hamilton is through a much more complex urban environment, will have higher frequencies and ridership, and is subject to several more years of inflation.
Very fair, however, the current government said it would be $5.5 billion. Meaning Hamilton would be over $425 millon / km. Where the heck is that number coming from?
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3...SIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3688  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2020, 12:30 AM
ChildishGavino's Avatar
ChildishGavino ChildishGavino is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 228
Well, I won't be getting much done around 9am tomorrow.

https://twitter.com/JoeyColeman/stat...75568584568840

"#HamOnt infrastructure announcement to be held Friday at 9am involving all levels of government"



With the Labour Minister and both Infrastructure Ministers involved, could this be what we've been waiting for?

Last edited by ChildishGavino; Dec 11, 2020 at 12:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3689  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2020, 1:12 AM
craftbeerdad's Avatar
craftbeerdad craftbeerdad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: LC <|> HMLTN
Posts: 507
Oh hot dang, last Christmas was a lump of coal, could we actually get a present this year regarding the LRT?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3690  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2020, 1:14 AM
ChildishGavino's Avatar
ChildishGavino ChildishGavino is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by craftbeerdad View Post
Oh hot dang, last Christmas was a lump of coal, could we actually get a present this year regarding the LRT?
I'm waiting with very bated breath right now. It's got all the right pieces! Plus, what else could they be announcing?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3691  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2020, 1:32 AM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,800
I'm not expecting much since my anticipation for this mess is at all time lows. Infrastructure announcement could be a number of things that have nothing to do with LRT.
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3692  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2020, 2:08 AM
TheRitsman TheRitsman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,055
My bets:

Option 1: The cancellation is cancelled. We plan to uncancel the cancelled project, until after we get re-elected because we plan to call a spring election. After which we will recancel the cancelled cancellation.

Option 2: BRT

Option 3: LRT but only to Queenstown circle, with possible expansion later

Option 4: LRT fully funded, in part by federal dollars

Option 5: Something unrelated to LRT at all. 403 expansion probably.
__________________
Hamilton Downtown. Huge tabletop skyline fan. Typically viewing the city from the street, not a helicopter. Cycling, transit and active transportation advocate 🚲🚍🚋

Follow me on Twitter: https://x.com/ham_bicycleguy?t=T_fx3...SIZNGfD4A&s=09
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3693  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2020, 2:33 AM
LikeHamilton's Avatar
LikeHamilton LikeHamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 2,756
It does not say where. That might help.

Maybe airport expansion? No needs the federal Transportation Minister.

Adding the missing 2 lanes of Hwy 6 be the airport?

Not MIP. I checked and they know nothing.

Not enough big ministers.

And anywhere from 3 to 5 billion for LRT would get both the Premier and Prime Minister.

Last edited by LikeHamilton; Dec 11, 2020 at 2:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3694  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2020, 3:23 AM
ChildishGavino's Avatar
ChildishGavino ChildishGavino is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 228
There is also the possibility those ministers and the Premier & PM are busy with other things, too. New cases are on the rise and most importantly, a vaccine is coming. Both first ministers have been very busy on planning how to get vaccines out to 38,000,000 people, and this announcement can (and will) be made just fine without them. Some sort of announcement has been teased since at least the 8th of October as "very soon", which my politicians' standards means in a few months, which is now.

I don't think it has to do with highways 403 or 6 either, while I didn't immediately dismiss the 403 because the MP for the West End-Dundas-Ancaster will be there, why would they make an announcement about a provincial concern with so many federal politicians involved? And unless there's a very large project which somehow none of us have caught wind of for the months it would've been in the works, I doubt tomorrow will be about the Airport, either. If it were, wouldn't it make sense to invite the M(P)P for the mountain as well?

I remain hopeful and optimistic. The past 361 days have been agony, and all signs are pointing to some good news indeed.

Last edited by ChildishGavino; Dec 11, 2020 at 3:55 AM. Reason: wanted to articulate my points better
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3695  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2020, 10:10 AM
ZTrade ZTrade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 161
According to the owner of that twitter account, it's not LRT. Takes too much effort to screenshot and post an image to this website, but it's at the bottom of that twitter thread.

This is most likely regarding Cootes Paradise.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3696  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2020, 2:21 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,736
yup. No people important enough to announce LRT. The transpo minister and even likely the premier would be in attendance for that. It's deputy ministers instead - likely something minor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3697  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2020, 2:35 PM
ChildishGavino's Avatar
ChildishGavino ChildishGavino is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 228
It's about funding to renovate the Griffin House in Ancaster. I don't think anybody was expecting that. I'd hardly call that an infrastructure announcement, but now I know why the MP for the West End, Dundas, & Ancaster is there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3698  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2020, 2:36 PM
King&James's Avatar
King&James King&James is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChildishGavino View Post
Well, I won't be getting much done around 9am tomorrow.

https://twitter.com/JoeyColeman/stat...75568584568840

"#HamOnt infrastructure announcement to be held Friday at 9am involving all levels of government"



With the Labour Minister and both Infrastructure Ministers involved, could this be what we've been waiting for?
https://www.newswire.ca/news-release...847265402.html

Today, the Honourable Filomena Tassi, Minister of Labour and Member of Parliament for Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas, on behalf of the Honourable Catherine McKenna, Minister of Infrastructure and Communities; Donna Skelly, Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade and Member of Provincial Parliament for Flamborough-Glanbrook, on behalf of the Honourable Laurie Scott, Ontario's Minister of Infrastructure; and His Worship Fred Eisenberger, Mayor of the City of Hamilton, announced funding for the restoration of the Griffin House National Historic Site.

These upgrades to an important cultural and historical landmark of Black settlement in Upper Canada will improve accessibility for all visitors, while restoring the heritage features of the house built in 1827. Griffin House was owned by Enerals Griffin, a Black immigrant from Virginia who was likely born a slave but settled as a free man in Canada in 1834. The home remained in his family for 154 years.

The Government of Canada is investing $399,960 in this project through the Community, Culture and Recreation Infrastructure Stream (CCRIS) of the Investing in Canada plan. The Government of Ontario is providing $333,267, while the City of Hamilton is contributing $266,673.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3699  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2020, 3:12 PM
LikeHamilton's Avatar
LikeHamilton LikeHamilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 2,756
What? Where? Never heard of it!

Most likely in Donna's area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3700  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2020, 5:10 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,397
Quote:
Originally Posted by LikeHamilton View Post
What? Where? Never heard of it!

Most likely in Donna's area.
Most likely this is the first time Skelly has heard of it too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:04 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.