HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3681  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2017, 5:52 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by bryanscott View Post
Hi all—I thought some of you might be interested in this. For anyone else, I apologize for the shameless plug.

My latest book is now in stores—Stuck in the Middle 2: Defining Views of Manitoba.

Here's a promo video. Check it out!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ot65KpfFN3g
Looks like I will add it to my Christmas list. Great stuff.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3682  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2017, 6:40 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
I enjoyed the first one immensely... looking forward to #2.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3683  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2017, 6:52 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
All nice, but it will cost you $20,000+ to have a baby or $1,000 to cast a broken bone....if you are uninsured that is.
And what you save on personal income taxes would more than cover personal health coverage with plenty left over to spend on other things, ie. actually deciding where to spend your own money rather than the govt.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3684  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2017, 7:34 PM
Wigglez's Avatar
Wigglez Wigglez is offline
Source?
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 662
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
And what you save on personal income taxes would more than cover personal health coverage with plenty left over to spend on other things, ie. actually deciding where to spend your own money rather than the govt.
Every man woman and child for themselves!!! Screw programs to help people who aren't me! I have another Audi to buy!

This kind of logic in Canada has always amazed me. Just move to the states? You're (in theory) white, they will welcome you with open arms!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3685  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2017, 7:39 PM
Wigglez's Avatar
Wigglez Wigglez is offline
Source?
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 662
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
And what you save on personal income taxes would more than cover personal health coverage with plenty left over to spend on other things, ie. actually deciding where to spend your own money rather than the govt.
So, how much do we actually pay for our public health-care system? Using the most recent tax and health-care expenditure data, we estimate that the average unattached individual will pay about $4,257 this year, while an average family of four will pay $11,494. Of course, the payments vary according to income.
https://www.fraserinstitute.org/arti...or-health-care

Average premiums and deductibles nationwide unsubsidized shoppers: Premiums for individual coverage averaged $321 per month while premiums for family plans averaged $833 per month. The average annual deductible for individual plans was $4,358 and the average deductible for family plans was $7,983
https://resources.ehealthinsurance.c...ithout-subsidy

Math! Take all your savings from private insurance and run rrskylar!!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3686  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2017, 7:48 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
And what you save on personal income taxes would more than cover personal health coverage with plenty left over to spend on other things, ie. actually deciding where to spend your own money rather than the govt.
This economic titan of states, North Dakota has grown from a 1930 population of 680,845 to 757,952 in just 87 short years!

Actually, IMO the finances of North Dakota give a pretty interesting window into how Manitoba may have fared, if the province would have retained our more efficient "postage stamp" geographical size, with the northern part of the province kept as a territory - Hydro be damned.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3687  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2017, 8:06 PM
Roger Strong's Avatar
Roger Strong Roger Strong is offline
Speak the truth, then run
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
And what you save on personal income taxes would more than cover personal health coverage with plenty left over to spend on other things, ie. actually deciding where to spend your own money rather than the govt.
Nope. Americans pay MORE taxes per capita for healthcare than Canadians. That's the blue "Public" part of the graph below:



The difference is that Canadians then GET that healthcare while Americans must pay a second time.

Maybe Americans' taxes are lower because of higher population density. Maybe some other reason. But not because of healthcare.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3688  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2017, 9:26 PM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
This economic titan of states, North Dakota has grown from a 1930 population of 680,845 to 757,952 in just 87 short years!

Actually, IMO the finances of North Dakota give a pretty interesting window into how Manitoba may have fared, if the province would have retained our more efficient "postage stamp" geographical size, with the northern part of the province kept as a territory - Hydro be damned.
Obviously, starting with the pre-Depression population figure is going to skew any such analysis. Also, Americans are far more mobile - there are a lot more places a North Dakotan can realistically move to in the US than there are places that Manitobans can go in Canada -especially if they want to be within within a day’s drive of home. ND is far more like Saskatchewan in terms of its traditional dependence on agriculture. Manitoba is economically more like Minnesota - that comparison wouldn’t go so well for Manitoba.
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3689  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2017, 9:32 PM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Strong View Post
Nope. Americans pay MORE taxes per capita for healthcare than Canadians. That's the blue "Public" part of the graph below:



The difference is that Canadians then GET that healthcare while Americans must pay a second time.

Maybe Americans' taxes are lower because of higher population density. Maybe some other reason. But not because of healthcare.
The “out of pocket” piece of the bar graph looks surprisingly similar for the two countries. I bet the average CBC-listening Canadian would guess that the ratio between out-of-pocket medical expenses in the US vs. Canada was 50 to 1, or even infinity ... but the graph seems to suggest maybe 1.5:1.
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3690  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2017, 8:29 PM
Wolf13 Wolf13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
All nice, but it will cost you $20,000+ to have a baby or $1,000 to cast a broken bone....if you are uninsured that is.
So get insured? Not that their system is great, but 2% income tax certainly is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
And what you save on personal income taxes would more than cover personal health coverage with plenty left over to spend on other things, ie. actually deciding where to spend your own money rather than the govt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wigglez View Post
Every man woman and child for themselves!!! Screw programs to help people who aren't me! I have another Audi to buy!

This kind of logic in Canada has always amazed me. Just move to the states? You're (in theory) white, they will welcome you with open arms!
Stop that bullshit.

The logic you just displayed, that any affront to our infallible (and horrible) health care system amazes me that so many Canadians hold it.

I'm not saying that the US have a great system, but neither do we. That Americans and Canadians alike always resort to this health care dick-measuring contest is so unbelievably shortsighted, because it does nothing to address the horrible care and high cost we pay here... regardless of what's done in the states.

And what kind of classist nonsense is that? His "Audi"? it's primitive to constantly pit peoples' successes against each other to avoid discussions.

The white comment? Take that lazy bullshit elsewhere.

Imagine your child has seizures and you have no idea why. You go to emergency. Despite the panic in your face and the uncertainty of what's caused a child to go completely crazy out of nowhere, friends of mine had to wait 12 hrs, watching their daughter have seizures, until they got addressed. The sysrtem had their reasons for handling it that way.

2 things to that:

1) You get what you pay for when "free" matters more than "care". Except it actually costs a lot. It should be way better
2) If that's your child, you'd pay in a heartbeat. You wouldn't be singing the tune of equal treatment and "free" (again, not free) health care when in that spot. The US system is NO solution, as they have a major pharma/insurance epidemic.

But Canada's collective "better than the US" and "free" knee-jerking is lacking any critical thought.


Every man and woman for themselves? Well, are you telling others to pay more, and disguising it as compassion? Because that doesn't sound like compassion. It's a nice crutch that a lot of leftists lean on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wigglez View Post
So, how much do we actually pay for our public health-care system? Using the most recent tax and health-care expenditure data, we estimate that the average unattached individual will pay about $4,257 this year, while an average family of four will pay $11,494. Of course, the payments vary according to income.
https://www.fraserinstitute.org/arti...or-health-care

Average premiums and deductibles nationwide unsubsidized shoppers: Premiums for individual coverage averaged $321 per month while premiums for family plans averaged $833 per month. The average annual deductible for individual plans was $4,358 and the average deductible for family plans was $7,983
https://resources.ehealthinsurance.c...ithout-subsidy

Math! Take all your savings from private insurance and run rrskylar!!!!
The original praise was for a 2% income tax. Those savings alone would wipe out the "high cost of healthcare" in the states.

Also, the same problem surfaces again... you point out the US, but all I see is we're top 3. Not a good place.

So why do so many go south for help? Because they're mean rich people? Or because they're not willing to put up with the bullshit up here? Think about it... I'm not defending the US, but Canadians are willing to go to the "worst" (because it's most expensive and that's what matters) system in the advanced world over our very own iconically Canadian system...
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
Yes. Driving is the number one priority for everything in our city. Even the diametrically opposed values of fewer potholes and building more roads to maintain seems to evade the most rational of winnipegger.
In fairness to ND, every intersection along that major highway is an overpass
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3691  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2017, 9:27 PM
BAKGUY BAKGUY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,138
Hmm.. puzzled here...
I am not sure how I ended up on this health care page?
I was so certain I was going to the link of of Skyscraper Page Forum ....WINNIPEG CONSTRUCTION IX ?
Must be a broken link??

Last edited by BAKGUY; Nov 3, 2017 at 11:50 PM. Reason: EDIT
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3692  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2017, 10:22 PM
Wigglez's Avatar
Wigglez Wigglez is offline
Source?
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 662
Eh, theres not really much to reply to your comment there Wolf13. You've decided to misquote me and take the casual dismissal of "crutch that a lot of leftists lean on." Of course you have also decided to provide no numbers/evidence/sources for any of your claims which I'm not surprised about. (for example, why are so many children with seizures being thrown on the streets in Canada without treatment??)

I suppose the only things worth commenting on would be

And what kind of classist nonsense is that? His "Audi"? it's primitive to constantly pit peoples' successes against each other to avoid discussions.

What discussions am I avoiding here? please do explain success shouldn't be condemned but avoiding social responsibilities while living in a society just because you believe you're above others isn't what Canada is.

My taxes go to roads I'll never use and people I'll never see (and since I guess you assume I'm a homeless "leftist" I'll haft to mention I pay A LOT in income taxes, that new Waverley underpass should be dedicated to me ), but those people my money is going to help will live a better life as a result. Not sure how that's "disguising it as compassion", that's a pretty narrow and pathetic way to view how a society functions.

Do you believe that all people that volunteer are just jerking themselves off and could care less about those they're helping? I'd ask you at my next volunteer effort but I suspect you won't be there

But as a few people have mentioned this is a construction thread for our 1 or 2 projects that don't have their own thread. No real reason to keep going as this will just devolve into your average twitter debate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3693  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2017, 5:15 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wigglez View Post
With all the hostile press/campaigns that new office on academy had I'm shocked they were able to so casually destroy that building without a lengthy consult process.

I just drove by it today and there doesn't appear to be a sign for a new building going up. Not much activity has taken place since it was razed (new parking lot for academy?)
I thought the same thing, but the only reason that happened with the doctor's office was because it was next door to Lindsey Steek, and it was her that led the crusade against it. Funny how she doesn't give a sh*t when it's not directly next door to her. She's brutal. Talk about a hypocrite, why should she get to have a retail store Academy (in an old house, no less), but other people can't? I've heard nothing but awful things about her, even before that debacle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3694  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2017, 6:06 PM
Ando Ando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,723
What happened to the moderator who so zealously removed any mention of Elon musk but is allowing this political discussion about health care to continue for pages? Wish there was some consistency.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3695  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2017, 6:49 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ando View Post
What happened to the moderator who so zealously removed any mention of Elon musk but is allowing this political discussion about health care to continue for pages? Wish there was some consistency.
called working 12 hr days up north
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3696  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2017, 10:28 PM
Ando Ando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,723
I hear ya. And thanks for what you do.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3697  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2017, 10:35 PM
Roger Strong's Avatar
Roger Strong Roger Strong is offline
Speak the truth, then run
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy6 View Post
The “out of pocket” piece of the bar graph looks surprisingly similar for the two countries.
That's "out of pocket" AFTER what insurance covers. Which an American would have also paid "out of pocket" for, only earlier, and five or six times as much. AND they pay higher taxes for healthcare.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy6 View Post
I bet the average CBC-listening Canadian would guess that the ratio between out-of-pocket medical expenses in the US vs. Canada was 50 to 1, or even infinity ... but the graph seems to suggest maybe 1.5:1.
No, 1.5:1 is about right. Americans pay 50% more for the same level of healthcare as Canadians.

Of course that's skewed demographically. Richer Americans paying more, while poorer Americans - or Americans with pre-existing conditions - go without and have shorter lifespans.

And no, Americans aren't getting better healthcare for it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3698  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2017, 11:14 PM
Roger Strong's Avatar
Roger Strong Roger Strong is offline
Speak the truth, then run
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf13 View Post
... because it does nothing to address the horrible care and high cost we pay here... regardless of what's done in the states.
Our care is roughly the same. Better in some ways, like overall life span, infant mortality, and cancer survival rates.

And "high cost?" Americans pay 50% more than we do, including higher taxes for healthcare.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf13 View Post
So why do so many go south for help?
That's largely a myth. The exceptions:

- Canadian snowbirds who get American treatment because they're living in Florida or Arizona.

- Specialized treatment like gamma knife radiation and proton beam therapy for some cranial tumors and specialized programs to treat severe brain injuries. With Canada having only 1/10th the population of the U.S., it's cheaper for the Canadian government to pay to send people to those clinics rather than set up similar clinics in Canada. (Winnipeg got it's own gamma knife a few years ago.) This is a function of population density. The U.S. and Canada could swap health care systems, and it wouldn't change a thing.

- People living along the border, for which we have agreements with nearby American hospitals to treat them. That goes both ways, of course. Like Sarah Palin getting her health care in Canada when she lived in Juneau.

- And yes, the very rich. Like independently wealthy Newfoundland Premier Danny Williams getting "minimally invasive" surgery to repair a leaky heart valve. Not only was the treatment available in at least four Canadian cities, but it was developed in Canada.

The difference: Luxury facilities. "If for example he came to the Ottawa Heart Institute he would be in a little private room where there's just a chair for his wife to sit on and his family [would]have to stand around the end of the bed. He goes to one of the American luxury institutions and he gets a suite for his wife and family and so forth."

Even proponents of the Canadian system will fully agree that the American systems is better for the wealthy.

Canada also has its specialties. U.S. insurers send Americans to Canada for hernia treatment using the Shouldice technique, for example. Also cosmetic dentistry and laser eye surgery. And of course Americans flock to Canada for prescription drugs and flu shots.

In the late '90s Ontario had to replace their health care cards because of all the Americans using fake cards to get treated in Canada.

Nearly 1 million people in California alone seek medical care in Mexico each year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf13 View Post
The US system is NO solution, as they have a major pharma/insurance epidemic.
American healthcare and insurance companies are INVESTMENT companies. The shareholders, not the patients, are the customers. They have a Congressionally granted exemption from anti-trust laws that is the wet dream of every other industry.

And of course you won't see anything in Canada's public system like the CEO of America's United Health Group stepping down as CEO, due to his involvement in an employee stock options scandal, with a $1.1 Billion golden parachute. Not for a job well done, but for resigning in disgrace. The voters would freak.

No answering to the voters, the American system can simply, logically, "go where the money is." Service the wealthy, and who cares about everyone else?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3699  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2017, 7:41 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,354
I'm not going to argue that the American Medical system is better overall, but to suggest that it's not better for those who have either have money or good insurance is ludicrous. And it's not just rich people but anyone with decent insurance, which is more than half of the people in the US. In Canada it doesn't matter how much money you have, you're not allowed to pay for better or quicker Healthcare. It's illegal for almost all significant procedures. In Canada you can pay for the best stylist to do your hair but not for the best surgeon to do your lifesaving surgery. I understand the public policy behind this but It does seem absurd on the surface.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3700  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2017, 8:49 PM
Roger Strong's Avatar
Roger Strong Roger Strong is offline
Speak the truth, then run
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
In Canada it doesn't matter how much money you have, you're not allowed to pay for better or quicker Healthcare. It's illegal for almost all significant procedures.
It's illegal for surgery. Pretty much everything else, you can pay for faster treatment. For *lifesaving* surgery, you're going to get that in Canada just as fast as in the US, and with doctors who are at least as good.

As for waiting lists, the reality is often much different from the theory:

The waiting list for sleep apnea testing in Manitoba for example is over a year. Of course I didn't wait a year; instead I was at RANA medical within a week. The overnight sleep/respiration/blood oxygen test cost me $196, and a CPAP machine cost me $2000. My private insurance through work paid for it, private insurance that costs FAR less than in the US because of what the public system covers.

That overnight test actually cost more, but the government paid RANA what it would have cost the public healthcare system had I waited.

I compared notes with an American friend. His insurance company made him wait for well over two years, insisting that he didn't need testing. When he finally got the test - that same overnight test cost his insurance company $7000 - yes, he needed treatment. AND THEN he got his CPAP machine right away.

So despite the year-long Canadian wait list, and the American getting his treatment "right away" on paper at least, I had my testing and treatment much faster than the fully insured American.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:48 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.