HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #341  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2018, 11:20 PM
Rocket49 Rocket49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 163
Other than looking very cool, is there an advantage to having concave sides on the east and west sides of the building?
     
     
  #342  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2018, 11:21 PM
Notyrview Notyrview is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,648
Yeah so much of this depends on how much steam’s left in the economy. I’d say 50/50 chance of getting built. Here’s to more steam.
     
     
  #343  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2018, 11:21 PM
F1 Tommy's Avatar
F1 Tommy F1 Tommy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,121
Very nice.
     
     
  #344  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2018, 11:22 PM
Khantilever Khantilever is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kngkyle View Post
Depending on if the 1422 is the structure height or the roof height, this could actually surpass Sears in the 'official' sense because the 'claws' on top of this would count as being architectural.
Doesn’t look like it, according to the Tribune’s front page article on this. Apparently they’re fine with being second place.

I’m glad. It’d be sad if the Sears Tower were dethroned on such a technicality (as happened once already *cough* 1WTC *cough*). When it is eventually surpassed—I’m looking at you, Spire 2.0—I hope it’s by a huge margin.
     
     
  #345  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2018, 11:24 PM
chicagoisepic's Avatar
chicagoisepic chicagoisepic is offline
The Hero we deserve
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notyrview View Post
Yeah so much of this depends on how much steam’s left in the economy. I’d say 50/50 chance of getting built. Here’s to more steam.
I'm pretty sure they're going to wait till the next market cycle to build this. According to the article on the first page, they're going to start with the redevelopment of the Tribune Tower first for the first three years and then do the tower after.
     
     
  #346  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2018, 11:29 PM
donnie's Avatar
donnie donnie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 622
This looks to wide(not tall) for the space that it's in!

Floor plans, we must have floor plans..
     
     
  #347  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2018, 11:29 PM
Hawkeyes10 Hawkeyes10 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagoisepic View Post
I'm pretty sure they're going to wait till the next market cycle to build this. According to the article on the first page, they're going to start with the redevelopment of the Tribune Tower first for the first three years and then do the tower after.
The article also mentions the tower could begin construction in late 2019 I believe. No reason they shouldn't be able to do both at the same time.
     
     
  #348  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2018, 11:31 PM
ChiTownWonder's Avatar
ChiTownWonder ChiTownWonder is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 618
At first I was kind of on the edge with this one. Seemed like a basic design, but I do love those side renderings where you can see those golden vertical fins and the crown. It also fits in very well with the skyline and dominates the area without being a sore thumb. Hopefully this gets built as is but past experience says not likely.
     
     
  #349  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2018, 11:34 PM
Notyrview Notyrview is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiTownWonder View Post
At first I was kind of on the edge with this one. Seemed like a basic design, but I do love those side renderings where you can see those golden vertical fins and the crown. It also fits in very well with the skyline and dominates the area without being a sore thumb. Hopefully this gets built as is but past experience says not likely.
I agree it's not groundbreaking, but it's a good design and isn't boring.
     
     
  #350  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2018, 11:35 PM
ChiTownWonder's Avatar
ChiTownWonder ChiTownWonder is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 618
It would be great if this tower can finally bring life to Cityfront Plaza!
     
     
  #351  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2018, 11:37 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,181
That’s gorgeous.

It reminds me of the proposal for 5 WTC.



Last edited by JMKeynes; Apr 17, 2018 at 12:31 AM.
     
     
  #352  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2018, 11:43 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,779
1,422’
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #353  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2018, 11:52 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
1,422’
     
     
  #354  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2018, 11:57 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,345
O wow. Very nice. Its one for the morning papers front page headline: "Chicago is back, awe of tower causes ER visits to skyrocket".
     
     
  #355  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2018, 12:00 AM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,792
I don't think this one has been posted

     
     
  #356  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2018, 12:02 AM
Fvn Fvn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 694
Terracotta on the east-west facades? Also, damn rendering qualities in general just keep getting better and better and better...
     
     
  #357  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2018, 12:02 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
It's like someone revived the old Waldorf-Astoria proposal
I was thinking the same. The Waldorf super tall proposal was one of my favorites during that cycle, shame it didn't manifest, but on the bright side, this design is quasi-Waldorf.

     
     
  #358  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2018, 12:03 AM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,335
That view makes the rest of Streeterville look tiny. It’ll be like when Sears was first built in the Loop.
     
     
  #359  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2018, 12:04 AM
wrab's Avatar
wrab wrab is offline
Deerhoof Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fvn View Post
Terracotta on the east-west facades? Also, damn rendering qualities in general just keep getting better and better and better...
I'm hoping it's terra cotta!
     
     
  #360  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2018, 12:08 AM
seadragon seadragon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 66
Tribune Tower Addition: Chicago's Expanding Architectural Spectrum

The rendering of the proposed Tribune Tower Addition, a building with organic like form yet composed with strongly non organic materials, relative to neighboring and very intricate if not elaborate, centennial level structures and superb expressions of architectural heritage along Michigan Ave, is handsome in appearance and looks very nice as presented.

The elegant and curvaceous form and color of the Tribune Tower Addition, one that has expressions of multiple buildings found in other regions of the world with a greater concentration of contemporaneous supertalls such as Shanghai, Pearl River Delta and Dubai, though dichotomous in presentation if not monolithic and svelte in concept to the very ornate Raymond Hood designed Tribune Tower with pronounced sculpted reliefs to the organic appearance of the materials used for construction, to the incorporating of stone like flying buttress reminiscent of Gothic Cathedrals, working to solidify Chicago's position in architectural prominence.

An architectural prominence that in the past 25-30 years (I remembering construction cranes atop the yet completed John Hancock, any future renaming of the building being an expression of disrespect for our nation's Declaration of Independence along with American and Chicago history, not just the insurance company and vulgar as renaming the Sears Tower to ever trying to rename the Chrysler or Empire State Buildings, New York City, to Transamerica Pyramid, San Francisco) and starting off slowly in less developed regions of the world, is now rapidly diminishing as Chicago much like the rest of the region, e.g. rank falling O’Hare Airport along with notable architectural omissions such a building to include failed project, not simply a structure (tower) greater than 2,000 feet (610m), yields to the next generation of planed, larger cities.

Last edited by seadragon; Apr 17, 2018 at 12:51 AM. Reason: inclusion of third paragraph
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:58 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.