HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3501  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 6:25 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,394
I'm surprised this isn't common knowledge. In Richmond development is built on pilings that mitigate the risk of liquifaction. As the city continues to densify the land is becoming more stable over time.

Quote:
Some degree of liquefaction can occur during an earthquake depending on the location, size and duration of an earthquake. Some homes and buildings could settle and crack and roads and other surfaces could become uneven due to soil failure. The best geotechnical information available to date indicates that there are only limited areas that are at risk of liquefaction. All new structures in Richmond are built on densified or otherwise improved ground and use foundation systems such as piles or raft slabs that are specifically designed to eliminate or mitigate the risk of liquefaction
.
http://www.richmond.ca/safety/prepar...?PageMode=HTML
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3502  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 7:09 PM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
I'm surprised this isn't common knowledge. In Richmond development is built on pilings that mitigate the risk of liquifaction. As the city continues to densify the land is becoming more stable over time.

.
http://www.richmond.ca/safety/prepar...?PageMode=HTML
The real issue Vanman is the presence of fault lines locally around the coastline in question. If a given earthquake lowers the coastline (as seen in Earthquake Park, Alaska) flooding and the destruction of infrastructure will occur (no matter how much piling is used in construction).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3503  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 9:29 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 12,778
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
I'm surprised this isn't common knowledge. In Richmond development is built on pilings that mitigate the risk of liquifaction. As the city continues to densify the land is becoming more stable over time.

.
http://www.richmond.ca/safety/prepar...?PageMode=HTML
Not pilings, raft slabs. Either way most major projects will be just fine.

Single family homes and older low rise developments might be a little more at risk though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3504  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 10:23 PM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Not pilings, raft slabs. Either way most major projects will be just fine.

Single family homes and older low rise developments might be a little more at risk though.
........I am happy to know that god is not only "right wing" but has the power to save human development/wealthy investors from that deadly demon...........mother nature!

Last edited by Caliplanner1; Sep 14, 2016 at 11:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3505  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2016, 10:36 PM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,377
Just got a card in the mail about this - it doesn't include Queensborough or downtown New West
Build Our Future City! Official Community Plan Workshop

Also https://www.newwestcity.ca/ourcity
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3506  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2016, 11:25 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 23,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-paladin View Post
I think the main concern with Richmond is not an eventual sea level rise in hundreds of years from now, but the potential for liquefaction during 'the big one'
Please see the pdf here, it's a government map of Richmond by liquefaction potential: http://www.empr.gov.bc.ca/MINING/GEO...es/2010-3.aspx
So basically all of Richmond is a high danger for liquefaction.

Somebody mentioned earlier nobody is concerned about it, but I know at least two people who work in Richmond who deliberately chose not to live there for that reason. Fact is until the big one hits, nobody really knows how the soil will behave.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3507  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2016, 11:32 PM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
So basically all of Richmond is a high danger for liquefaction.

Somebody mentioned earlier nobody is concerned about it, but I know at least two people who work in Richmond who deliberately chose not to live there for that reason. Fact is until the big one hits, nobody really knows how the soil will behave.
All this politically motivated apathy/pro development rhetoric in Richmond is expected. What honestly do people expect of the powers-that-be in Richmond?? These Richmond politicians/urban planners and city fathers need investors to be confident in the security of their investment dollars there......so it's just common sense to put out news bites/propaganda that promotes the seismic safety of Richmond!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3508  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2016, 2:15 AM
SkytrainCar026's Avatar
SkytrainCar026 SkytrainCar026 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 84
Construction beginning at Yuanheng's project

Over the last month or so, Yuanheng's project at Capstan & No.3 has started preliminary construction. I got some shots from the Skytrain.

According to their website, they'll announce their plan in "Fall 2016."

http://yuanheng.ca/



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3509  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2016, 10:26 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,884
Cool, thanks!

I wonder if there'll be much retail and/or a hotel?
Maybe a hotel on the waterfront?

We can assume what the heights will be!


http://yuanheng.ca/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3510  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2016, 11:18 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,158
The ocd in me wishes they could straighten out river road and develope that warehouse in the middle. Looks like that isn't part of this project

Edit. From skytraincar pics it looks like that warehouse is included? (And is now that pile of dirt)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3511  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2016, 11:44 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,884
Maybe it's a separate project by someone else?
(i.e. a more advanced project?)

Google maps shows River Road being straight.
That curved line is the former railway RoW - not sure if it's slated for a road (?)
or maybe it's already a road (looks preloaded) that lines up with jagged Corvette Way (?).


https://www.google.ca/maps/place/Bri...4d-123.1048001

Last edited by officedweller; Sep 19, 2016 at 11:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3512  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2016, 11:52 PM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,158
No. I mean the new river road alignment that connects to corvette way. And yes it I believe it is to be a road. From Gilbert Rd to capstan. (I think)

Another words I wish corvette way could be straightend
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3513  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2016, 12:03 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,884
Gotcha - River Road has been realigned on the railway RoW shown in the [old] aerial pic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3514  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2016, 4:02 AM
Sin_City Sin_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Las Vegas, NV & Richmond, BC
Posts: 62
Does Yuanheng's development get to benefit from having the future Capstan Station without contributing to it like Concord and Pinnacle?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3515  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2016, 3:27 PM
VanK VanK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sin_City View Post
Does Yuanheng's development get to benefit from having the future Capstan Station without contributing to it like Concord and Pinnacle?
No. Yuanheng is contributing a significant portion - $7,000,000 in fact along with the other big 3: Concord, Pinnacle & Polygon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3516  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2016, 12:24 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,884
Richmond Cadence - punched window finishes:


Before&After @CresseyGroup #cadence site. Again our men did a fantastic job on this architectural concrete monument
https://twitter.com/TheQuorumGroup
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3517  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2016, 12:35 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,158
That's very cool. Love it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3518  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2016, 2:06 AM
Sin_City Sin_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Las Vegas, NV & Richmond, BC
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by VanK View Post
No. Yuanheng is contributing a significant portion - $7,000,000 in fact along with the other big 3: Concord, Pinnacle & Polygon.
I'm surprised that Polygon has to contribute as well since their project is a little further away from "Capstan Village."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3519  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2016, 4:28 AM
VarBreStr18 VarBreStr18 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sin_City View Post
I'm surprised that Polygon has to contribute as well since their project is a little further away from "Capstan Village."
How much does the station costs? I am surprise at the $7, 000,000 by one company alone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3520  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2016, 2:52 AM
Sin_City Sin_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Las Vegas, NV & Richmond, BC
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarBreStr18 View Post
How much does the station costs? I am surprise at the $7, 000,000 by one company alone.
I think it may be budgeted at $25 million +.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:21 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.