Quote:
Originally Posted by LosAngelesSportsFan
Makes sense. The LA area numbers seemed low to me and if you're undercountimg Latinos, well....
|
Yeah, I have long suspected a significant disconnect between the census numbers and the facts on the ground, especially in cities like Los Angeles.
First, COVID severely impacted the 2020 Census. It reduced time to do the survey overall, and especially wiped out time that is usually reserved toward the end of the count for identifying traditionally hard-to-count populations (new and illegal immigrants, the indigent, homeless, and people with high language barriers). Also, COVID reduced the census workforce through attrition, based on months-long furloughs and the fact that the pandemic made the door-to-door and group quarters counts more stressful and risky. Also, a lot of people suddenly starting moving around because of COVID, both temporarily and permanently, at the very time the count was to be taken.
Second, the Trump regime hobbled the process and participation in it. Trump repeatedly attempted to include language that would identify illegal immigrants by name and address. Even though that language was ultimately ruled out by the courts, the sentiment almost certainly suppressed said immigrants' and their family members' participation (which was the whole point). Trump also curtailed the process--already delayed by months at the front end--by at least a month. Nobody to see
here, folks!
I could be wrong, but I suspect the 2020 Census could the be least accurate in ages because of these factors, especially in cities like LA that have lots of immigrants, people with language barriers, poor and homeless people, etc.