HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #34541  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2016, 2:42 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Troolway

What else would you call walkway under the bridge ?

Engineered troughs form the main piece is prefabricated and brought in by barge


Caissons were installed months ago the pieces are now placed on top of the supports and will rest on the rebar/concrete filler.


The trough is hung from a frame sitting on the caisson, here the extra length of caisson is cut off exposing the rebar.






cutting off the stubs from the supports - these will be covered by the pavers when done.


__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34542  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2016, 3:49 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryc View Post
Sept 14
Paulina TOD
...
Nice looking building. Would have been better twice as a tall, though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34543  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2016, 4:29 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,901
A few things from next Friday's zoning commission agenda:

1) 1550 N Talman (~North & Talman) a little east of Humboldt Park, the park. 6 stories, 30 units with 24 indoor parking spaces and ground floor commercial. It'll replace this building and some south of it. There's a few buildings across the street on North Ave that are 5 stories - that'll create a nice little area for midrise-ish density.

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.9102...7i13312!8i6656

2) 4 story building with 18 units and commercial space at 2109-11 S Halsted on a vacant lot near Skylark and Pleasant House

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8538...7i13312!8i6656

3) 1523 N Fremont trying to get zoning for the 156 room hotel. This is near New City/North & Clybourn

4) 925 W Chicago Avenue - trying to establish 48 units above Proline Golf with a 4th and 5th floor addition for some of the new units. This is right near the two new high rises at 1001 W Chicago that were just permitted for new construction over the former Gonnella Baking Co.

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8963...8i6656!6m1!1e1
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34544  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2016, 5:54 PM
streetline streetline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
I'm mildly disappointed to see the Tribune land around Chicago/Halsted still kept open for industrial use.

That's a natural for dense office and residential mixed use... you have multi-level streets to handle traffic and it's isolated from existing neighborhoods (i.e. pockets of NIMBYs). It's not right next to transit, but it's a short walk to the Blue Line. A growing cluster there with 600 W Chicago might actually force the city to provide better transit there as well (cheapest thing would be a busway on the old rail spur running up to Clybourn Metra).
If you look at the long term scenario maps towards the end of the document (http://www.cityofchicago.org/content...2ndMeeting.pdf), you'll see the Tribune property is shown as mixed use. I'd love to see that turn mixed use sooner rather than later, but at least it is in the plan.

I'd like to see the street-fronting parts of the vacant lots on the south side of Grand turn buffer/retail/commercial as well (they are not shown as such on any map). While I understand the chocolate factory wants to expand in that direction, I think making that part of Grand more pedestrian friendly would go a long way towards connecting River North, River West, and any new development on the Tribune property into a walkable and pleasant neighborhood. And a retail/commercial liner strip along Grand wouldn't preclude a Blommer expansion in the area behind it around the train tracks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34545  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2016, 6:04 PM
mattshoe mattshoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
A few things from next Friday's zoning commission agenda:

1) 1550 N Talman (~North & Talman) a little east of Humboldt Park, the park. 6 stories, 30 units with 24 indoor parking spaces and ground floor commercial. It'll replace this building and some south of it. There's a few buildings across the street on North Ave that are 5 stories - that'll create a nice little area for midrise-ish density.

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.9102...7i13312!8i6656
Thank god they added commercial to the building on Talman, originally it was just parking on the first floor, kept it at 6 stories, and keeps the cars inside. Im excited about a bit more density as well in the neighborhood (I live on this block)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34546  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2016, 8:15 PM
prelude91 prelude91 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 196
^^^Interesting, I didn't know the history, though I will shed zero tears for the demo of that building. I'm hoping the NE corner of Halsted and Diversey will see some development in the near future. the KFC recently closed, and the other tenant is a bank; not sure if this lot would count as TOD, but would be a great location for a 6-7 story building with 25-30 unites.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34547  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 1:00 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Congress Theatre - Logan Square

Aug 08
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.

Last edited by harryc; Aug 15, 2016 at 9:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34548  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 3:13 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,557
^ Think you reposted your Atrium village shot here, fyi -
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34549  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 7:16 AM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlajos View Post
Good that building always creeped me out. What is going there?
Seems to have been a City-run public health clinic for STDs, equipped to handle HIV. Not so surprising given the seemingly intentionally forgettable name and appearance of the facility, which would also suggest foetus terminations could have been among their services as well. Curious to what extent the City is providing services like these throughout the neighborhoods, and how that may or may not be shifting to other providers with federal health care reform.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34550  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 7:23 AM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stockerzzz View Post
...
The new buildings are horrifically dubbed "L3" - Lakeview Luxury Living.
...
Thanks for your comprehensive post incorporating both history and before & after images. There is so much upside potential for that Halsted-Diversey corner (silly marketing notwithstanding).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34551  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 9:49 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
^ Think you reposted your Atrium village shot here, fyi -
TY - working out the kinks in moving from Picassa Web albums to Flickr.
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34552  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 5:34 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
S7L 367 W Sedgewick

Aug 13
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34553  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 5:35 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,524
Quote:
Originally Posted by streetline View Post
If you look at the long term scenario maps towards the end of the document (http://www.cityofchicago.org/content...2ndMeeting.pdf), you'll see the Tribune property is shown as mixed use. I'd love to see that turn mixed use sooner rather than later, but at least it is in the plan.

I'd like to see the street-fronting parts of the vacant lots on the south side of Grand turn buffer/retail/commercial as well (they are not shown as such on any map). While I understand the chocolate factory wants to expand in that direction, I think making that part of Grand more pedestrian friendly would go a long way towards connecting River North, River West, and any new development on the Tribune property into a walkable and pleasant neighborhood. And a retail/commercial liner strip along Grand wouldn't preclude a Blommer expansion in the area behind it around the train tracks.
I know, I would just prefer a stronger stance by the city in favor of commercial/residential. Tribune/TRONC is already selling half the Freedom Center property (north of Chicago) and with the decline of print circulation they'll probably sell the south half fairly soon as well and move to lower-cost digs. The time for a land use decision is now, not in the "long term". Really any industrial use south of Chicago should be gradually phased out, maybe with an exception for Blommer.

That being said, this is Chicago, so I expect this process to be developer-driven once the city opens the door. But it would be nice for once to have the city stake a firm claim toward establishing a bustling, mixed-use center around Chicago/Halsted. With the elevated streets you could build a mini Illinois Center or Roosevelt Collection, on the lines of Atlantic Station in Atlanta with parking, loading, and maybe transit tucked away on lower levels.

Without that, we could end up with car dealerships there or some other crappy low-intensity use under the guise of "short term planning". The dealerships are creeping in... Howard Orloff is already using some of the Finkl property to store more cars, and Fletcher Jones just built a huge storage and service facility off Elston, in addition to their big new showroom they're building at North and the Kennedy. (FWIW, I'd love Orloff to move to the Finkl site to unlock the TOD potential at their current location).

I agree on the need to make Grand walkable, although if the north side/Tribune parking lots get developed in a walkable fashion you could probably landscape the south side like Finkl did along Cortland, and you'd have a semblance of a walkable street. Really Grand isn't very walkable across the river, either... there's a nice fountain plaza at Kingsbury but then blank walls and parking lots for another 1000' until you get to Orleans.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...

Last edited by ardecila; Aug 15, 2016 at 5:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34554  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 6:55 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,283
There is no way Tribune is going to unload the printing plant and truck yard with the PMD intact if they want to extract maximum value out of the real estate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34555  
Old Posted Aug 15, 2016, 7:19 PM
MultiModal MultiModal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by k1052 View Post
There is no way Tribune is going to unload the printing plant and truck yard with the PMD intact if they want to extract maximum value out of the real estate.
I saw the plans back in April. Three High Technology Office's (whatever that means) that were around 13 stories 39,000 RSF floor plates and residential tower in the middle that was subject to zoning. There was a lot of parkland and nice riverwalk. All the parking was below street level.

I wouldn't take much stock into what I saw, really it just all seemed like a placeholder.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34556  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2016, 3:16 AM
streetline streetline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
I know, I would just prefer a stronger stance by the city in favor of commercial/residential. Tribune/TRONC is already selling half the Freedom Center property (north of Chicago) and with the decline of print circulation they'll probably sell the south half fairly soon as well and move to lower-cost digs. The time for a land use decision is now, not in the "long term". Really any industrial use south of Chicago should be gradually phased out, maybe with an exception for Blommer.

That being said, this is Chicago, so I expect this process to be developer-driven once the city opens the door. But it would be nice for once to have the city stake a firm claim toward establishing a bustling, mixed-use center around Chicago/Halsted. With the elevated streets you could build a mini Illinois Center or Roosevelt Collection, on the lines of Atlantic Station in Atlanta with parking, loading, and maybe transit tucked away on lower levels.

Without that, we could end up with car dealerships there or some other crappy low-intensity use under the guise of "short term planning". The dealerships are creeping in... Howard Orloff is already using some of the Finkl property to store more cars, and Fletcher Jones just built a huge storage and service facility off Elston, in addition to their big new showroom they're building at North and the Kennedy. (FWIW, I'd love Orloff to move to the Finkl site to unlock the TOD potential at their current location).

I agree on the need to make Grand walkable, although if the north side/Tribune parking lots get developed in a walkable fashion you could probably landscape the south side like Finkl did along Cortland, and you'd have a semblance of a walkable street. Really Grand isn't very walkable across the river, either... there's a nice fountain plaza at Kingsbury but then blank walls and parking lots for another 1000' until you get to Orleans.
Grand isn't quite that bad east of the river; the only real blank walls are a small parking ramp, and the ComEd facility. The doors/windows/stairways on the other buildings might not be that interesting for people who don't live or work there, but they exist and provide some human scaled texture. Once the corner lots along Orleans are eventually redeveloped, it should be nice enough.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34557  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2016, 3:28 AM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by MultiModal View Post
I saw the plans back in April. Three High Technology Office's (whatever that means) that were around 13 stories 39,000 RSF floor plates and residential tower in the middle that was subject to zoning. There was a lot of parkland and nice riverwalk. All the parking was below street level.

I wouldn't take much stock into what I saw, really it just all seemed like a placeholder.
I saw a very similar plan around that time as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34558  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2016, 2:16 PM
Pilton Pilton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 281
^ In the Transitional Zone, ther big winners seem to be the Tribune (mixed use allowed) and Blommer (expanded manufacturing use). Both decisions seem entirely rational.

But, very few people walk along the Blommer side of Kinzie or Des Plaines. Blommer needs to step up now that expanded manufacturing has been written into the plan.

Smells good; looks barren. Blommer needs large delivery trucks to be kept off Kinzie and a little "Finkl-style" landscaping along Kinzie and Des Plaines, IMO.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34559  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2016, 3:12 PM
chikid chikid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 15
Just wanted to share with you a video on a recent project from the University of Chicago that was a pretty cool design and engineering feat.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY0j0oePngI
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34560  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2016, 3:41 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilton View Post
^ In the Transitional Zone, ther big winners seem to be the Tribune (mixed use allowed) and Blommer (expanded manufacturing use). Both decisions seem entirely rational.

But, very few people walk along the Blommer side of Kinzie or Des Plaines. Blommer needs to step up now that expanded manufacturing has been written into the plan.

Smells good; looks barren. Blommer needs large delivery trucks to be kept off Kinzie and a little "Finkl-style" landscaping along Kinzie and Des Plaines, IMO.
the loading dock situation is dire too. ive seen some trucks take 20 minutes trying to back in properly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.