HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3401  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2020, 5:36 PM
eschaton eschaton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,245
I remain frustrated that although Gold 4 is going to be redeveloped over the next three years - and Gold 2 has to be redeveloped eventually - there are apparently no plans at all to develop the surface parking sections of Gold 1. It's been utterly absent from any discussions in the media.

I mean, when the Gold 1 garage was built, I presumed it was sunk way back on the parcel next to the T tracks because the eventual plan was to totally surround it with development, making it largely invisible from the street. But apparently no...this section of the sea of parking will stay indefinitely.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3402  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2020, 7:40 PM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,609
I have a feeling that Lot 1 might always be surface parking. I think it will be quite hard to wrest it away from the Steelers control, given that it’s the prime tailgater lot.

Which to me, is totally dumb. But then again, I think hanging out on an asphalt parking lot surrounded by vehicles and fat, drunk people in Steelers jerseys is totally dumb.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3403  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2020, 7:59 PM
WillyC WillyC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 99
Peduto tweeted no to the new Strip proposal. Zero chance if the mayor office is already coming out swinging.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3404  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2020, 9:20 PM
Don't Be That Guy Don't Be That Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillyC View Post
Peduto tweeted no to the new Strip proposal. Zero chance if the mayor office is already coming out swinging.
Every attorney in Allegheny County with a twitter account just saved a screenshot of that tweet.
I recently spoke with a more knowledgeable friend about this and he thinks that at this point developers in Pittsburgh should just assume that they will have to get their approvals from the courts and not the Planning Commission. He also said that project likely couldn't be done by-right without variances, so who knows?

Last edited by Don't Be That Guy; Feb 23, 2020 at 9:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3405  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2020, 9:36 PM
Minivan Werner Minivan Werner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillyC View Post
Peduto tweeted no to the new Strip proposal. Zero chance if the mayor office is already coming out swinging.
What’d he say? Can’t find the tweet, unless it was deleted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3406  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2020, 2:10 AM
eschaton eschaton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,245
I believe that area of the Strip (up to the 16th Street Bridge) has downtown zoning, meaning there is no height limit whatsoever. There are however FAR requirements which I believe may preclude building something of this square footage on that parcel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3407  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2020, 3:31 AM
WillyC WillyC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 99
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3408  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2020, 7:50 PM
Jonboy1983's Avatar
Jonboy1983 Jonboy1983 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The absolute western-most point of the Philadelphia urbanized area. :)
Posts: 1,721
As I stated, I would rather see twin structures reaching a total height of around 21 floors rather than having one single building with that kind of massing. It does look a bit out of place.
__________________
Transportation planning, building better communities of tomorrow through superior connections between them today...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3409  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2020, 10:34 PM
mikebarbaro mikebarbaro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 116
The apartment building next to The Cork Factory is officially under construction. This is the one where the balconies resemble a cruise ship....

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3410  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2020, 11:03 PM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,609
The Gulf Tower looked terribly out of place when it was built, so did the Steel building, and so does the Cathedral of Learning.

Should they not have been built?

A 20 story building will only look “out of place” until the next taller buildings are built on all the Strip parking lots bordering downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3411  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2020, 12:57 AM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj3000 View Post
The Gulf Tower looked terribly out of place when it was built, so did the Steel building, and so does the Cathedral of Learning.

Should they not have been built?

A 20 story building will only look “out of place” until the next taller buildings are built on all the Strip parking lots bordering downtown.
Exactly. Everything on the Downtown side of the 16th Street Bridge should be considered on its way to a Downtown vibe, not still part of the Strip-type built environment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3412  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2020, 6:35 PM
fonzi fonzi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj3000 View Post
The Gulf Tower looked terribly out of place when it was built, so did the Steel building, and so does the Cathedral of Learning.

Should they not have been built?

A 20 story building will only look “out of place” until the next taller buildings are built on all the Strip parking lots bordering downtown.
I rarely chime in on this forum, but had to show emphatic agreement with this logic. With at least one other rejected mid rise proposal in the strip, I think Peduto and the overall NIMBY-ism are only delaying the inevitable. It's the best place for downtown to expand.

It's rather irksome to have a mayor try to stifle a 21 story project, when your immediate and near immediate big metro neighbors either having a new tallest in progress, or are being proposed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3413  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2020, 7:43 PM
Jonboy1983's Avatar
Jonboy1983 Jonboy1983 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The absolute western-most point of the Philadelphia urbanized area. :)
Posts: 1,721
I'm not opposed to this being a 21 story building. I just think the architectural style could be different. I'd love to see a 20-plus story building go up in that part of the city.
__________________
Transportation planning, building better communities of tomorrow through superior connections between them today...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3414  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2020, 11:44 PM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonboy1983 View Post
I'm not opposed to this being a 21 story building. I just think the architectural style could be different. I'd love to see a 20-plus story building go up in that part of the city.
I can see some reasonable controversy over just the design/style parts of it. I was persuaded by some of the renderings, but those can be deceptive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3415  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2020, 5:28 PM
East Edge's Avatar
East Edge East Edge is offline
World Class City
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 144
Agreed! The smart ass comment from the mayor doesnt show a spirit of welcoming development in the city. There is definitely a more productive way as Mayor to express his vision for higher quality design. Just goes to show that this power has gone to his head and how out of touch he is with his constituents.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fonzi View Post
I rarely chime in on this forum, but had to show emphatic agreement with this logic. With at least one other rejected mid rise proposal in the strip, I think Peduto and the overall NIMBY-ism are only delaying the inevitable. It's the best place for downtown to expand.

It's rather irksome to have a mayor try to stifle a 21 story project, when your immediate and near immediate big metro neighbors either having a new tallest in progress, or are being proposed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3416  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2020, 6:15 PM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by East Edge View Post
Agreed! The smart ass comment from the mayor doesnt show a spirit of welcoming development in the city. There is definitely a more productive way as Mayor to express his vision for higher quality design. Just goes to show that this power has gone to his head and how out of touch he is with his constituents.
His tweet was a bit too smug. To me, it would have been much more mayoral to tweet something more in-line with his follow-up comments, but it would be no less ridiculous.

Quote:
Peduto offered a basic statement further explaining his tweet in an email to the Pittsburgh Business Times on Tuesday afternoon.

"The architectural design doesn't match the Strip District," he said. "The design makes the building stand out in an area where there's been a lot of growth, but where there's been an attempt to make the new buildings blend in with the historic nature of the area, and the design of that building should do the same."
I find this excuse to be a lazy cop out. First, the Strip district does not have a specific "design". Second, trying to "match" or "blend in" with buildings that are a century-plus older rarely results in anything good, and third, if there in fact has been some attempt to make new buildings blend in as the Mayor asserts, well, they've done a really shitty job.

In addition, on the blocks bounded by the 16th Street Bridge and the Convention Center (the tract where the proposed building will go), few buildings even exist there currently... and all of the sizable buildings there are relatively newer anyway... and the Homewood Suites and AC Hotel certainly don't respect the "historic nature of the area".

Should the citizens of Pittsburgh demand that the developer "blend in" like what Buncher did up and down Liberty Ave. in the past? You know, to match the long, low train terminal?
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.4465...7i16384!8i8192

Do these new developements "blend in"??
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.4567...7i16384!8i8192

https://www.google.com/maps/@40.4559...7i16384!8i8192

Is this a nod to the historic nature of the area?
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.4530...7i16384!8i8192
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3417  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2020, 6:34 PM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
Chillin' in The Burgh
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spring Hill, Pittsburgh
Posts: 13,100
I just found an actual photo of BrianTH in real life...

__________________
Check out the latest developments in Pittsburgh:
Pittsburgh Rundown III
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3418  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2020, 6:35 PM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
Chillin' in The Burgh
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spring Hill, Pittsburgh
Posts: 13,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by East Edge View Post
Agreed! The smart ass comment from the mayor doesnt show a spirit of welcoming development in the city. There is definitely a more productive way as Mayor to express his vision for higher quality design. Just goes to show that this power has gone to his head and how out of touch he is with his constituents.
Agreed
__________________
Check out the latest developments in Pittsburgh:
Pittsburgh Rundown III
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3419  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2020, 1:03 AM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austinlee View Post
I just found an actual photo of BrianTH in real life...

Ha! I have them on t-shirts too . . . .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3420  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2020, 1:05 AM
BrianTH BrianTH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,073
I also agree with East Edge et al. I really don't think the Mayor should be involved in design stuff to begin with, and if he is going to comment anyway, at least make it diplomatic and constructive, not snarky and dismissive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:45 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.