HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #321  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2007, 10:13 AM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
Skyriser
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CA/AZ Nomad
Posts: 7,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnumMike
I'm wondering about the plans to expand the Hotel San Carlos, where the heck are they going to put the tower? If they were to put up the high-rise, it would have to be on Monroe, which would be blocked.
There are basically two alternatives the Mellikans (sp?) were floating.

One involved construction of a tower on the roughly P-shaped western 1/3rd of the property that is not under any historic preservation ordinance, the shorter part where Seamus McCaffrey's (excellent, excellent food) is now. It would be very, very close to the massing of 44 Monroe. I believe this part was constructed in 1955.

The other alternative would be an addition on top of the hotel itself in either a modern architectural style or essentially bring the Italian Renaissance look of the current building to substantial height. This will require a "Certificate of Appropriateness" from the city HP committee, and we all know how fun that will be.

There is an excellent write-up of the hotel's history on http://www.hotelsancarlos.com/history.html--it is remarkably well preserved, especially for Phoenix. I am not a structural engineer, but I assume plopping a tower on top would require significant changes to the interior, which altho are not generally covered under the ordinance, it would piss off any number of anti's and preservationists. Tho who knows--they simply built buildings better back in 1927. Adding height might not be so difficult.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #322  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2007, 6:47 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by HX_Guy View Post
This is a great looking tower, but the parking base is awful. If they could put some glass around those voids, then vent the thing it would look ten times better.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #323  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2007, 7:53 PM
JimInCal's Avatar
JimInCal JimInCal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 597
I agree c-monkee. The parking podium dominates the street scene, being the first 10-11 floors. If this gets built, I hope they rethink the parking structure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #324  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2007, 11:26 PM
HX_Guy HX_Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,103


As we celebrate the 75th anniversary of the original 1931 Valley National Bank building, Grace Communities is renovating this historic landmark and reopening the doors as the Hotel Monroe. When completed, this chic newly renovated boutique hotel will be located in downtown Phoenix in the center of Copper Square at the intersection of Central Avenue and Monroe Street, arguably one of the finest locations in the valley. The Hotel Monroe provides approximately 144 rooms ranging from standard, junior suites and one and two bedroom suites. The eleventh floor of the hotel will be designated as the concierge floor featuring several unique suites & penthouses. The twelfth floor will feature a unique nightclub with sunset views of downtown and the valley. Hotel guests will enjoy a variety of cuisine options and entertainment venues including a five star restaurant and lounge, wine bar, night clubs and a barista café. Executive boardrooms and meeting rooms will be abundant. The boutique hotel's accommodating amenities are sure to please every discriminating taste-just a few examples are 24 hour room service, full service spa with saunas and whirlpool, a state of the art fitness center, yoga room and outdoor sundecks with cabanas.

The building as it stands today, with the ground floor completely unused and boarded up.


Last edited by HX_Guy; Jan 8, 2007 at 9:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #325  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2007, 3:56 AM
JimInCal's Avatar
JimInCal JimInCal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 597
The Smaller Things

There are so many things I like about the reuse of this old bank building as a small hotel. The amenities it will bring to the area are substantial, with a 5-star restaurant, wine bar and night club on the top floor. It's great to add more hotel rooms to support the convention center expansion as well. It's on the light rail line and across the street from a major new condo tower, 44 Monroe. This will give the residents of 44 Monroe some nice night-life options right outside their front door.

This reminds me of a hotel I stayed in near Union Square in San Francisco. Quaint, classic 30's architecture with a history and a personality. The high visability, grandios projects are great but it's these smaller, quieter projects that add texture, interest and soulfulness to a city. Well done Grace.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #326  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2007, 8:28 PM
JimInCal's Avatar
JimInCal JimInCal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 597
HXGuy, what happened to the rendering of the Hotel Monroe? It has disappeared from the post here and on the Phx Devel thread as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #327  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2007, 9:39 PM
HX_Guy HX_Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,103
January 08, 2007 Updates


44 Monroe - 34 Stories - 411 ft.



Sheraton Downtown Hotel - 31 Stories - 360 ft.

January 08, 2007







Summit at Copper Square - 23 Stories - 253 ft.




Last edited by HX_Guy; Jan 8, 2007 at 9:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #328  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2007, 10:17 PM
sundevilgrad's Avatar
sundevilgrad sundevilgrad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 736
Nice pics HX. SCS looks tall from the warehouse district doesn't it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #329  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2007, 11:01 PM
BANKofMANHATTAN's Avatar
BANKofMANHATTAN BANKofMANHATTAN is offline
Go Pens!
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 414
I'm sorry, but those are hideous.

I don't care for the style, they remind me of the Crescent City Residences in New Orleans (which they're overhauling to update it - thank god.)



[/QUOTE]
__________________
ONWARD & UPWARD
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #330  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2007, 3:45 AM
JimInCal's Avatar
JimInCal JimInCal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 597
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimInCal View Post
HXGuy, what happened to the rendering of the Hotel Monroe? It has disappeared from the post here and on the Phx Devel thread as well.
The rendering has mysteriously reappeared. Maybe it was my computer at work having a bad day...home has the pic...NEVERMIND
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #331  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 12:20 AM
kenc kenc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by BANKofMANHATTAN View Post
I'm sorry, but those are hideous.

I don't care for the style, they remind me of the Crescent City Residences in New Orleans (which they're overhauling to update it - thank god.)



[/QUOTE]

I agree. Really ugly buildings, and we deserve better. More than any other city in America, because Phoenix is is so brand new; 21st century architecture will be norm. Shanghai in the desert. I like the rail system, but I wish the money was there for a heavy rail subway beneath Central ave., and Phoenix would become a linear dense city a la Las Vegas.
Get some Casinos.

Last edited by kenc; Jan 15, 2007 at 12:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #332  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 2:15 PM
sundevilgrad's Avatar
sundevilgrad sundevilgrad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 736
The Light Rail runs along central and will definitely help bridge the gap between midtown and downtown. Investment money is already pouring in along the rail routes and if it continues to follow the trends of Dallas, Denver and Salt Lake I bet we will see midtown and downtown merger within a decade. Heavy rail subway would not work in this city, not to mention that it is extremely cost prohibitive. Street level light rail was the right choice, although it would've been nice if they mixed in some elevated sections in the most congested areas.

As for the design of Cielo, it doesn't do much for me either. I think they should scrap the big, blank billboard facades on the top and go with nice crown of some sorts. The buildings themselves are somewhat slender, so I don't think the model does them justice. Once built I think they will look sleek and not appear as boxy as they do in the model.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #333  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 3:41 PM
soleri soleri is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by sundevilgrad View Post
The Light Rail runs along central and will definitely help bridge the gap between midtown and downtown. Investment money is already pouring in along the rail routes and if it continues to follow the trends of Dallas, Denver and Salt Lake I bet we will see midtown and downtown merger within a decade. Heavy rail subway would not work in this city, not to mention that it is extremely cost prohibitive. Street level light rail was the right choice, although it would've been nice if they mixed in some elevated sections in the most congested areas.
Light rail will play a somewhat different role here than it does in other cities. Phoenix has a very low employment hub downtown and midtown. In contrast, the downtowns in Dallas and SLC are genuine regional centers. What Phoenix is hoping for is extra urban growth where the impetus is otherwise lackluster. This will necessitate some patience since density along the route is the anticipation, not the current reality.

I still think the Val-Trans model was the correct one (modeled after Vancouver's Sky Train). Downtown would have been the hub and five spokes would have radiated outward. It was very expensive (paid for by property taxes!) but it would have addressed some of the systematic problems with a sprawl-based city. It would have made downtown functional and connected it to the Camelback Corridor. It lost because Phoenix has a perpetual vision problem outside of cheap fixes like freeways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #334  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2007, 6:21 PM
NorthScottsdale NorthScottsdale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 301
Here are a few of Will Bruder's renderings of the W downtown phoenix hotel that is proposed to go right next to US Airways Center. I absolutely love this design and i hope it works out and gets built to look like this!!!!
This first one is a scale.

And a view looking southeast

A view looking east towards Chase field

And finally an overhead shot


I LOVE IT! I LOVE IT! I LOVE IT!
I hope that the hotel gets approved and goes ahead with construction. and i hope that they use this design for the building. it would look great
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #335  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2007, 7:35 PM
phillyskyline's Avatar
phillyskyline phillyskyline is online now
Monomania w/ Skyscrapers
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In the sky with other skyscrapers
Posts: 2,573
I love the colors of the new W but it looks a bit wide for my taste.
__________________
"OK gang, you know the rules, no humping, no licking, no sniffing hineys."
Harry Dunne
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #336  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2007, 8:23 PM
sundevilgrad's Avatar
sundevilgrad sundevilgrad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 736
Quote:
Here are a few of Will Bruder's renderings of the W downtown phoenix hotel that is proposed to go right next to US Airways Center. I absolutely love this design and i hope it works out and gets built to look like this!!!!
This first one is a scale.
From what I know the Bruder design was not the design that was selected. That is part of the reason that the building is going through such a tough time getting approved. The design they chose requires removing the roof of a historic warehouse that part of Phoenix's old China town. The Bruder design, from what I've heard, would not affect the historic building and would be easier to get approved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #337  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2007, 9:33 PM
PHX602's Avatar
PHX602 PHX602 is offline
UrbanPHX
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 871
Here is the final design for the W.







__________________
View My Diagram
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #338  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2007, 1:19 AM
NorthScottsdale NorthScottsdale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 301
I think Bruder's design would look a lot better in the skyline. just my personal opinion... if anybody cares
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #339  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2007, 11:06 AM
oliveurban's Avatar
oliveurban oliveurban is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,907
^ We care .

Most of us tend to agree--at least I do--that Bruder's overall design was better, and more exciting.

But, I think at this point just getting the damn thing built at all (and soon) is more important than the ultimate design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #340  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2007, 7:22 PM
nbrindley's Avatar
nbrindley nbrindley is offline
-_-
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: PHX->IC,IA->ATL
Posts: 254
yeah, I think the general consensus is that the Bruder design is much more attractive. I think the white version is a bit goofy looking, but as long as it gets built, I don't mind.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:02 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.