HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #321  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2026, 5:27 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdRain&Snow View Post
^A step in the right direction. Surprised that it only takes 10 days to sail from Churchill to Antwerp.
I agree. Proof of concept in a real-world situation would seem to be a big step forward. the fact that it's a Manitoba company supporting another Manitoba operation makes me smile.

That short time lag to ship to Antwerp should be a huge carrot for investors, especially European investors.
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #322  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2026, 5:44 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,180
200 tonnes is super small amount, maybe 2-3 rail cars worth. And being shipped on a barge, with other product, to Europe, across the ocean. On a barge? Seems like risky I guess haha Anywho, nice to see sdome tests being done.

On the potash front. Saskatchewan producing 25 million tonnes in 2024 vs PADCOM trying to ramp up to 10,000 tonnes this summer. 1 unit train leaving a potash mine typically ships 10,000 or more tonnes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #323  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2026, 6:44 PM
ColdRain&Snow's Avatar
ColdRain&Snow ColdRain&Snow is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
200 tonnes is super small amount, maybe 2-3 rail cars worth. And being shipped on a barge, with other product, to Europe, across the ocean. On a barge? Seems like risky I guess haha Anywho, nice to see sdome tests being done.

On the potash front. Saskatchewan producing 25 million tonnes in 2024 vs PADCOM trying to ramp up to 10,000 tonnes this summer. 1 unit train leaving a potash mine typically ships 10,000 or more tonnes.
Got to start somewhere.
__________________
"Build baby build."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #324  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2026, 7:29 PM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
200 tonnes is super small amount, maybe 2-3 rail cars worth. And being shipped on a barge, with other product, to Europe, across the ocean. On a barge? Seems like risky I guess haha Anywho, nice to see sdome tests being done.

On the potash front. Saskatchewan producing 25 million tonnes in 2024 vs PADCOM trying to ramp up to 10,000 tonnes this summer. 1 unit train leaving a potash mine typically ships 10,000 or more tonnes.
I was thinking on a barge to one of the east coast ports (Montreal or Halifax?), and then trans loaded on to a regular container ship. I think a fair amount of stuff comes to Churchill by barge so this would be backhaul for the barge shipping company.

In 2017 VIA rail shipped out their stranded passenger train by barge from Churchill to Montreal. The engines alone were around the 90 ton mark each and the shipboard cranes apparently had no issues lifting and placing both of them and the passenger cars. 2 container of potash should be less weight than the VIA load.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #325  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2026, 7:38 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdRain&Snow View Post
Got to start somewhere.
Yes of course.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cllew View Post
I was thinking on a barge to one of the east coast ports (Montreal or Halifax?), and then trans loaded on to a regular container ship. I think a fair amount of stuff comes to Churchill by barge so this would be backhaul for the barge shipping company.

In 2017 VIA rail shipped out their stranded passenger train by barge from Churchill to Montreal. The engines alone were around the 90 ton mark each and the shipboard cranes apparently had no issues lifting and placing both of them and the passenger cars. 2 container of potash should be less weight than the VIA load.

Seems rather inefficient. I guess for a test for shipping something by rail. It would make sense to also ship in containers. But for long term shipping program, a ship with berths direct to Europe is the way to go. Or maybe shipping them by container to churchill and onto a container ship is also okay. Both methods have pros and cons.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #326  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2026, 12:10 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 7,358
__________________
Winnipeg Act II - April 2024

Winnipeg Developments

In The Future Every Building Will Be World-Famous For Fifteen Minutes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #327  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2026, 9:17 PM
phone's Avatar
phone phone is offline
Unregistered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 742
I'm sure that given this whole Northern Gateway Initiative, people have been considering alternative routes to Churchill, with an obvious connector being the CN and short line route from Saskatoon/Warman to Hudson Bay, SK via Melfort as a viable alternative route for westbound traffic from Churchill, rather than having to boomerang back into MB to get onto either the westbound TCH route or Yellowhead? Looks to me that it would only need a few km of track from Crooked River to Hudson Bay, SK rebuilt, otherwise the tracks are all there and in use, at some level of service. And all CN trackage (or former trackage). A much better way to connect western commodities, goods, and people to Port of Churchill.

This would work well for passenger service, as eastbound VIA Canadian services could branch at Saskatoon before joining Churchill-bound services at Hudson Bay SK via Warman, either Humboldt or Prince Albert, and Melfort, before Hudson Bay SK, while westbound VIA Canadian services could branch at Melville, and proceed via Yorkton to meet Churchill-bound services at Canora, SK. Services could originate from Regina, too, before picking up the same route at Saskatoon.

Either way, this route would introduce some level of public transit to a relatively long list of towns, over a fairly wide area, each for Saskatchewan standards. This would catch Regina, Davidson, Warman, Rosthern, Prince Albert, Humboldt, Melfort, and Tisdale, as well as Yorkton on the Melville-Canora branch. Plus other small towns in east central Saskatchewan, one of the province's relatively more densely populated rural areas compared to say, Palliser's Triangle in the southwest and west central...

Another potential side benefit could be de facto local and regional service within and around Saskatoon, with services able to stop at commuter places like Clavet, Warman, and Aberdeen, as well as closer to the city centre, perhaps with a new station facility at the old Richmond sub (near Richmond Heights), as well as maybe a few local stops along the west loop that parallels Circle Drive starting south of Stonebridge up to Richmond and north parallel to Warman Road past Lawson up to Warman, then on to either Prince Albert or Humboldt...

As for CPKC interchange, if VIA ever runs on the old mainline again, access could be provided either by Regina-originating service to Saskatoon and onto Hudson Bay, or simply by running services to Churchill via Yorkton instead of Dauphin before Canora.

It's a little confusing with Hudson Bay, SK being the town where all these services would converge on the mainline from Winnipeg to Churchill, given that the service is ultimately bound for the sea at Hudson Bay, but it's a distinction without a much of difference, given that the only way on or north or down or whatever you want to call it is Hudson Bay itself.

I'm sure that more proactive minds than I have already considered this at depth, and I'm curious if anyone here has any perspective on the topic. Both from Manitoba and Saskatchewan, as we are in it together with the Hudson Bay line already.

Fortunately, this seems to be an area that both our provincial governments can work together on, which I hope comes as some reassurance to our friends in Manitoba that Saskatchewan isn't about to hold any damn referendum, no matter what fake AI news keeps pumping out.

Last edited by phone; Jun 24, 2026 at 9:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #328  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2026, 12:32 PM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 7,358
Quote:
Saskatchewan mine books space on Hudson Bay Railway
Gabrielle Piché
Tuesday, Jun. 23, 2026

A Saskatchewan mine deemed a project of national importance by Ottawa will ship its goods on the Hudson Bay Railway.

Eldorado Gold is sending nickel concentrate to Eastern Canada. To get there, it’s trucking the product to the Hudson Bay Railway’s Flin Flon stop.

The nickel concentrate is then railed to The Pas, where it’s transferred to the Canadian National Railway network.

“It’s all kicking off,” said Chris Avery, president of Hudson Bay Railway owner Arctic Gateway Group.

Prime Minister Mark Carney referred the Saskatchewan mine — the McIlvenna Bay project — to Ottawa’s Major Projects Office in September.

The mine could produce up to 4,200 tonnes daily of copper and zinc ore concentrates containing gold and silver. It’s in the Flin Flon Greenstone Belt, in east-central Saskatchewan.

Eldorado Gold Corp., owns the mine. It began production this month.

Eldorado didn’t make a spokesperson available Tuesday; its website says it plans to start active commercial production at McIlvenna Bay this fall.

Arctic Gateway expects to transport Eldorado’s goods around once a week, Avery said. The two companies are talking about extending the rail line closer to the Saskatchewan mine, which is roughly 100 kilometres away.

Avery is also pitching the company on using the Port of Churchill to reach new markets. A team in Ottawa’s Major Projects Office is working on a business case to expand the port.

Modernizing the Hudson Bay Railway to boost its industrial weight standards — to fully interoperate with Canada’s Class 1 rail network — is part of the discussions with the Major Projects Office, Avery said. “We believe that is needed to further grow the rail line and port.”

Meantime, the Hudson Bay Railway is being used to bring Hudbay Minerals’s zinc concentrate to the Port of Churchill. It’s being stored in facilities on-site, to be shipped this fall.

Hudbay can ship up to 20,000 tonnes of zinc concentrate this year, Avery said. Hudbay Minerals didn’t make a spokesperson available Tuesday.

It’ll be the third consecutive year of zinc concentrate moving through the port. The past two years have seen a delivery location of Antwerp, Belgium.

It’s up to Hudbay to decide where this year’s shipment lands, Avery said.

Representatives from both Hudbay and Eldorado, in a news release, called the Hudson Bay Railway and Port of Churchill important to connecting northern mines with international markets.
Free Press
__________________
Winnipeg Act II - April 2024

Winnipeg Developments

In The Future Every Building Will Be World-Famous For Fifteen Minutes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:46 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.