Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City
You were the one who said 'take', not me. So you think that Metro Vancouver should buy the privately owned Hills at Portal Golf Course (created in 1927), and a cattle farm, and a nursery, and some other ALR land. And then the Semiahmoo first nation will happily add that (on the other side of Highway 99) to the land where they have some of their homes, and the band office, and the piece of land where they're probably developing the gasification plant that just got a $14m Federal grant.
Well that shouldn't face any sort of problems. Come back to us and let us know when it's all arranged.
|
Pretty sure plenty of FNs have lands that are far more separated from each other than a highway.
Like pretty much every FNs in Metro Vancouver aside from Tsawwassen and Semiahmoo? They all have separated parcels.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut
Forcibly making an FN band give up their land,
|
Again, no one is 'giving up' or ‘taking’ anything.
Seriously, look back at my original comment. No jurisdiction is changing hands.
No one is proposing a Vanier Park situation except you and Changing-City.
Also, I presume you don't understand how Regional Parks work?
Because it's not some 'other City' that's responsible for it.
Quote:
in exchange for worse land on the other side of a highway - and on the pretext that only the City can properly take care of their ecosystem for them, no less - sounds like a political Darwin Award.
|
I'm not sure the FN would
even want to directly manage a nature-oriented park.
The Tsleil-Waututh originally wanted to take the Admiralty Lands (part of Belcarra Regional Park) directly, for instance, and now, they get front-rows in planning and use of Belcarra Regional Park.
http://www.metrovancouver.org/media-...-regional-park
The only buildings that would (theoretically) be lost in this proposal is the band office at the gates into the reserve proper, but I don't think they would be forced to move.
There's plenty of situations like that in regional parks, where there are private users of the land that's
technically parkland because they don't want to move (or are preserving heritage property.)
Also, it seems like the estuary of a river is worse land than mostly flat plains on the opposite site of the highway.
1. A higher % of the land is not covered by streams and rivers.
2. One of them is actually developable without the diking of the riverbed. Which is what you'd have to do otherwise.
3. The upland areas on the north side of the Campbell River (facing Surrey) are literally just as disconnected in practical terms as the other side of 99 (unless you plan on wading across the Campbell River...)
4. The amount of land is larger, and mostly flat (unlike the Campbell River Estuary, which is a canyon surrounded by uplands.)
Also, this discussion about 'connectedness' assumes Semiahmoo actually wants to develop most of that land for their own direct use, and not to generate revenue.
Which is probably untrue, especially given the small size of the nation.
The 'core' of the reserve is fronting the ocean, and most of the lots
there are barely developed.