Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBoot
That's moot! I think his point was that SA is not quite near the top in metro growth.
The metro's 2% growth includes SA proper's 1.6%. More than 60% of all growth is coming from the city proper (the city constitutes a little more than 60% of the metro's overall population).
|
I’m not sure how it’s moot when he specifically made a claim that I refuted. If you want to interpret what he said to be something else, you’re more than welcome to, but that doesn’t change the fact that what he stated was what he stated nor does it moot the point.
Also, where did you pull that 60%number from? The metro growth was 48,000. Meaning, if the city growth was 24,000, then another 24,000 was attributed to the metro. So, 50% was city and 50% was metro.