|
Posted Jul 14, 2009, 10:06 AM
|
![HooverDam's Avatar](image.php?s=959e62479cf4b94d227480d2b5370355&u=14045&dateline=1167437284) |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Country Club Park, Greater Coronado, Midtown, Phoenix, Az
Posts: 4,610
|
|
West Valley casino update:
http://www.azcentral.com/community/g...asino0714.html
Quote:
Glendale officials fears casino would strain city services
9 comments by Carrie Watters - Jul. 14, 2009 12:00 AM
The Arizona Republic
Glendale leaders felt blindsided when a tribe in January rolled out renderings for a casino near the city's sports and entertainment district.
The Tohono O'odham Nation has no reservation near Glendale, although it hopes to change that with the help of a federal settlement to replace tribal lands damaged decades ago.
The tribe, which already operates three casinos in southern Arizona, wants to build a 600-room resort and a casino. As it seeks federal approval to take the Valley property into the reservation system, it is promoting the casino idea as a boon for the tribe and a win for the West Valley economy, providing thousands of construction and hospitality-related jobs.
Glendale leaders question that boon. They say the venue would strain city services from water and sewer to roadways and public safety.
And some residents worry about crime from a casino that would be less than a mile from an 800-home neighborhood and around the corner from a high school.
While few suspected that gambling would grow on a county island within Glendale's borders, the experiences of cities with nearby casinos show the two can coexist with negotiation between tribal and city leaders.
That conversation hasn't happened yet in Glendale.
Living near a casino
In Tucson, Maria Saucedo raised nine children in a home that is less than a quarter-mile from the Tohono O'odham casino on Nogales Highway.
The 40-year resident said that she's seen no increase in crime or vandalism to her home with its tidy yard and rose-covered archways.
"It's just there," she said of the casino.
Scott Sirois, CEO of the Tohono O'odham Gaming Enterprise, said the tribe understands that customers must feel safe as a matter of good business. Cameras are used in the casino and in parking lots, and security staff are trained to deal with situations before they escalate, he said.
That's not to say casinos don't generate crime. Of last year's 867 police calls to the Tohono O'odham's three casinos, 38 percent involved offenses that are classified on the FBI's crime index. Intoxication was the most common.
The rest could be less serious crimes or simply calls for assistance.
In Riverside County, Calif., where most reservations and casinos are patrolled by the county Sheriff's Department, Lt. Ray Wood compared crimes at casinos to those at any venue that attracts a lot of people, such as sporting events and music concerts.
Riverside deputies reported an average of 280 calls from 2005 to 2007 at Spotlight 29 Casino. The venue in Coachella is the most comparable in size to the casino proposed in Glendale.
Westgate City Center, the outdoor mall in Glendale's sports and entertainment district, generated 539 police calls in 2008.
Public-safety services
Glendale's public-safety concerns go beyond crime to the cost of providing police officers and firefighters, particularly as tribes do not pay taxes to municipal coffers.
On that front, Glendale could incur an expense that Scottsdale and other Valley cities with nearby casinos do not.
Scottsdale, Chandler and Tucson police rarely deal with the tribe-owned casinos near their cities because the tribes have their own public-safety departments.
But the Tohono O'odham's main reservation is more than two hours south of Glendale, making it impractical for tribal police and firefighters there to act as first responders.
Should Glendale provide public-safety services, the city estimates the cost at $2.8 million a year for fire protection, plus $14.6 million to build a fire station.
It estimates police services would run about $950,000 a year. That assumes the resort/casino would generate 8,500 public-safety calls a year.
Glendale's estimate appears overly high. It is nine times higher than the number of calls for service reported by the Tohono O'odham police in 2008 at all three of the tribe's casinos combined.
Tohono O'odham Chairman Ned Norris Jr. has said options for securing public safety in Glendale are negotiable.
The tribe's state-certified police officers could build and work from a substation at the Glendale site, or the nation could reach agreements for services with a local jurisdiction.
Such an agreement exists in Palm Springs, Calif., which is a checkerboard of city and tribal land and has a tribal casino in its downtown.
Palm Springs public-safety agencies in 2008 responded to 899 calls to the resort and casino owned and operated by the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. The city spent about $1.1 million to provide that service in the 2007-08 budget year.
The Agua Caliente, through various negotiated funding streams, provided Palm Springs $1.9 million that year.
Infrastructure
Beyond public-safety costs, Glendale worries about infrastructure costs, including roadways, which are expected to carry 1.2 million annual visitors to the casino, and water and sewer services.
Most tribes in the Valley provide their own water and sanitation, but that is not always the case.
The Tohono O'odham Nation's Desert Diamond Casino-Hotel near Tucson paid $904,851 in 2007 to connect to Pima County sanitation services. It continues to pay for usage. "They're treated simply as a customer," Pima County Administrator Chuck Huckelberry said.
As for roads, Huckelberry said the county negotiates with the tribe as needed. The tribe paid to widen a road at one of its casinos there and installed bus curbs at the other.
But transportation problems can arise.
Tribes do not have to complete traffic studies, which are standard operating procedure for projects moving through municipal planning.
In Chandler, the Transportation Department requested but never received a traffic study for the Gila River Indian Community's Lone Butte Casino, which opened last year off Loop 202.
"It would have given us some comfort," Chandler Traffic Engineer Mike Mah said.
As it turned out, casino traffic on nearby Kyrene Road was minimal, Mah said.
Scottsdale and the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community wrestled with who should pay to widen Pima Road, half in the city and half on tribal land, before jointly commissioning a study to determine who would benefit the most. The results, due in the coming months, is expected to offer a reasonable approach to fund the roadwork.
In Glendale, the Tohono O'odham envisioned the casino entrance about a quarter-mile off Loop 101 on Northern Avenue. The tribal chairman shifted gears when Glendale leaders said this would interfere with future road plans. The tribe's compromise would place the entrance off Glendale and 95th avenues.
Further conversation to determine if this is a workable solution has gone nowhere as Glendale seeks to stop the entire project.
Discussions of funding roadwork would require that the two sides talk with one another, Norris said.
|
I just cant' get my mind around why Glendale is so against this. Just work out a deal where the Tribe pays some/all of that infrastructure costs and let them build the damn thing. What insane world are people living in where they think having a casino in their area is going to lead to mobsters roaming their streets raping their kids or something?
Glendale could promote Westgate, the Casino, UofP, Jobing.com, Camelback Ranch, the US Basketball facility and Zanjero as a nice large sports and entertainment area. The casino would of course bring construction jobs which are needed right now, and people visiting would certainly also go to nearby restaurants and keep that money in Glendale instead of the E. Valley.
Ah well, no use in trying to understand NIMBYs and a city with leadership that wants Light Rail to forgo their core I guess.
|
|
|