detroit might very well have been undercounted.
i suspect many (most?) big messy US cities with large areas of high poverty probably are.
but this line from the article was pretty damn silly:
Quote:
Luke Shaefer, professor of public policy at UM and director of the university's Poverty Solutions initiative, noted that 2019 Census estimates put the city at roughly 670,000 people. Such a decline was "anomalous and implausible," according to the report.
|
if Mr. Shaefer thinks a drop of 30,000 people from census estimate to census count is
"anomalous and implausible", then i would love to hear what he thought of chicago's 2010 census result which came in
~155,000 people lower than the CB's 2009 estimate.
the fact is, the CB has a pretty horrible track record of accurately estimating the populations of rustbelt cities, especially when they're 9 years out from the last official count. these kinds discrepancies are hardly
"anomalous" at all. people who put any faith at all into 9 years stale census estimates are grossly misguided.