HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #33001  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 4:33 PM
msu2001la msu2001la is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Via Chicago View Post
Wow, terrible.

That is a great building that should be re-purposed, not torn down (for no apparent reason).

I don't understand how our city allows this to happen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33002  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 4:34 PM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Ameya Pawar just might be my favorite aldreman in the city

To Keep Small-Town Feel, Lincoln Square Needs To Get Bigger, Alderman Says

Source: https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/2016...eds-get-bigger
Ald Pewar gets it and have proven himself multiple times to be a defender of pedestrian friendly and urban principles.

Other enlightened alderman include Joe Moreno (1st), Pat Dowell (3rd) and John Arena (45th). If only the rest of the city council would lead instead of cower to obstructionism while ignoring larger trends that Pewar so eloquently laid out. Lincoln Square in particular is in the midst of a major demographic shift and the now widespread conversion trend of two and three flats into single family homes is eviscerating affordable apartments in this neighborhood and in others nearby while contributing to a continuing cycle of population decline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33003  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 4:47 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,623
i love how we never hear about this stuff until theres literally a hole in the wall. of course thats the entire point.

how in the world is this building not rated or subject to a demo hold?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33004  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 4:58 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,891
Quote:
Originally Posted by Via Chicago View Post
i love how we never hear about this stuff until theres literally a hole in the wall. of course thats the entire point.

how in the world is this building not rated or subject to a demo hold?
Someone on this forum actually posted about it a week or so ago as the permit was issued back then for it.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33005  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 4:59 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,623
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Someone on this forum actually posted about it a week or so ago as the permit was issued back then for it.
right, because 7 days is enough time for any sort of viable public response to be mounted, outside of a post on a niche development forum
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33006  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 5:26 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by Via Chicago View Post
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33007  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 5:38 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,623
its just crazy to me looking at these demo pics....like how easily could this have been turned into lofts/open floorplan offices...

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33008  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 5:40 PM
UrbanLibertine UrbanLibertine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Someone on this forum actually posted about it a week or so ago as the permit was issued back then for it.
Ah ha, somebody here actually does read my posts (aside from the guys on Curbed)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33009  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 6:22 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,891
Quote:
Originally Posted by Via Chicago View Post
right, because 7 days is enough time for any sort of viable public response to be mounted, outside of a post on a niche development forum
You missed my point. My point was about someone telling how people on this forum don't find out about things until after they've happened. In this case, while it was just a week, it was still posted about a week or so ago for us.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33010  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 6:56 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Via Chicago View Post
its just crazy to me looking at these demo pics....like how easily could this have been turned into lofts/open floorplan offices...

But that would cost a shit ton of money, and thus the rents would have to be high to make it all work. That would be horrible and immoral.

It's better to demolish and keep property values in the area low, to keep the neighborhood affordable.

In the spirit of preserving affordability, I'm in favor of demolition!

.....but anyhow, in all seriousness, we discussed this last week and already had our chance to lament its loss. I'm surprised it wasn't orange rated and thus triggered the demolition hold
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33011  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 7:15 PM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,815
^Yep, not Orange rated. As dumb as it may sound, my guess is the glass block windows knocked it further down the historic survey list because the windows were an alteration. The building is pretty much intact otherwise.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33012  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 7:29 PM
Ned.B Ned.B is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 610
^I posted about this issue back when the Presbyterian Hospital started demolition. The historic survey of the city really needs to be updated and revisited, as many more buildings are now eligible, and some may have been misclassified. For instance there is a largely intact George Maher house in Lakeview that is only rated yellow as well. Only reason I can figure is that the porch has been glassed in and the second floor cladding may not be original. But nothing that could not be reversed and yet the building can be torn down at anytime.

Similar thing almost happened on Burton Place, and now that house in on it's way to being part of a Landmark District.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33013  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 7:30 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
^ The only consolation is that, in this part of town, this lot won't remain vacant for long. Almost certainly a developer is going to build something here
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33014  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 8:19 PM
PKDickman PKDickman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago Shawn View Post
^Yep, not Orange rated. As dumb as it may sound, my guess is the glass block windows knocked it further down the historic survey list because the windows were an alteration. The building is pretty much intact otherwise.
Actually, these big bank buildings are under-represented in the CHRS.

There are only about 50 listed and a third of those are downtown.
Who knows what kind of political sh!t went on when they did the survey.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33015  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 8:41 PM
Ned.B Ned.B is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 610
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ The only consolation is that, in this part of town, this lot won't remain vacant for long. Almost certainly a developer is going to build something here
I have a suspicion that this will be used only to expand the already enormous parking lot next door that serves the Plumbers Union.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33016  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 8:44 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ned.B View Post
I have a suspicion that this will be used only to expand the already enormous parking lot next door that serves the Plumbers Union.
yea id like to be optimistic but lets be real here. this is the same city that knocked down the Stock Exchange only to have it sit as a rubble strewn lot in the middle of the loop for the past 15 years. all it takes is one real estate pullback (which is going to happen sooner or later) and we're stuck with another self inflicted gaping wound in our urban fabric.

Last edited by Via Chicago; Apr 29, 2016 at 8:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33017  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 9:49 PM
prelude91 prelude91 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 196
Quote:
Originally Posted by Via Chicago View Post
yea id like to be optimistic but lets be real here. this is the same city that knocked down the Stock Exchange only to have it sit as a rubble strewn lot in the middle of the loop for the past 15 years. all it takes is one real estate pullback (which is going to happen sooner or later) and we're stuck with another self inflicted gaping wound in our urban fabric.
Outside a handful of neighborhoods, people just don't care about preservation in this city. There is also the issue of how expensive it is to rehab old buildings, Chicago just doesn't have the demand to make saving these buildings feasible.

I really hate so many aspects of this city...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33018  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2016, 10:33 PM
LaSalle.St.Station's Avatar
LaSalle.St.Station LaSalle.St.Station is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 335
Red face

If only we had some city department that could coordinate new development and it's integration into the existing building stock and when needed preservation of that building stock.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33019  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2016, 12:37 AM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,623
Quote:
Originally Posted by prelude91 View Post
Chicago just doesn't have the demand to make saving these buildings feasible.
thats simply not true. the renaissance in Fulton Market, River North, River West along Milwaukee Ave, and all sorts of other places bears this out. i dont get the impression the owners of this building had any interest whatsoever in preservation regardless of the building's potential. it dosent take demand, it takes a will and someone who gives a sh*t...something sorely lacking in this city as of late.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33020  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2016, 12:52 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by prelude91 View Post
Outside a handful of neighborhoods, people just don't care about preservation in this city. There is also the issue of how expensive it is to rehab old buildings, Chicago just doesn't have the demand to make saving these buildings feasible.

I really hate so many aspects of this city...
Friggin A, with the hyperbole.

There will be demolitions, guys. Get over it.

But at lease in the parts of town not dependent on public subsidies, a lot--a fucking lot--of properties are being renovated and seeing a new light. You guys are just fixating on bad news.

The south and west sides are a different story (at least in certain sizable chunks of those areas)
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:48 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.