HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3201  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2022, 4:39 AM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between RRock and a hard place
Posts: 4,474
Delete
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3202  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2022, 6:13 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin,TX<-->Dripping Springs,TX<-->Birmingham, AL<-->Warm Springs,GA
Posts: 57,205
https://www.kxan.com/news/local/aust...rest-of-state/
Quote:
Greater Austin Metro recovered jobs from COVID-19 pandemic faster than rest of state

by: Cora Neas
Posted: Sep 16, 2022 / 04:48 PM CDT
Updated: Sep 16, 2022 / 04:48 PM CDT

AUSTIN (KXAN) — In a media call today, the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) stated that the Greater Austin Metro area recovered jobs lost during the COVID-19 pandemic after only 13 months, faster than other Texas metro areas. Texas’ recovery occurred after 21 months.

Mariana Vega, director of the TWC Labor Market Information Group, said that the area also added 1,000 jobs in August; a positive sign after 3,500 jobs were lost in the area during July. Statewide, Texas has seen employment increases in 27 of the last 28 months, and positive growth during that period in all metro areas.

“Since August of 2021, Texas has added just under 727,000 jobs. To give you context, that’s more people than live in the state of Vermont,” said TWC executive director Ed Serna. “More Texans are working than ever before. We’ve set new employment highs for the past 10 consecutive months as non-farm employment has reached over 13.5 million individuals.”

Vega’s data shows that most jobs added in August were in government (8,100 statewide), professional and business services (5,200) and education and health services (3,800). The sectors that lost jobs during August were trade, transportation and utilities (-3,900), leisure and hospitality (-3,200) and information (-1,400).

According to Texas Labor Market Information, Austin’s unemployment rate decreased from July to August and currently rests at 2.9%. Texas’ unemployment rate of 4.2% is still above the national rate of 3.8%.
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3203  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2022, 6:01 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,601
Interest rates

So interest rates have been steadily rising as the Fed tries to tamp down inflation. I can see on Zillow how the housing market in Austin has made a virtual 180 in the last 6 months -- tons more inventory on the market, and pricing continues to march downwards many areas of the city.

My question is, how will rising interest rates affect the Tall Building market here in Austin? Will the same kind of general dynamic occur between builders and investors and buyers? I've heard anecdotes about homebuilders pulling back bigly, and/or left holding the bag on projects they're finally delivering but can't break even on. Same for skyscrapers?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3204  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2022, 8:07 PM
N90 N90 is offline
Voice of the Modern World
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,106
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3205  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2022, 8:09 PM
paul78701 paul78701 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
So interest rates have been steadily rising as the Fed tries to tamp down inflation. I can see on Zillow how the housing market in Austin has made a virtual 180 in the last 6 months -- tons more inventory on the market, and pricing continues to march downwards many areas of the city.

My question is, how will rising interest rates affect the Tall Building market here in Austin? Will the same kind of general dynamic occur between builders and investors and buyers? I've heard anecdotes about homebuilders pulling back bigly, and/or left holding the bag on projects they're finally delivering but can't break even on. Same for skyscrapers?
I'm no expert, but being that it takes years to build skyscrapers, it's likely a whole different ballgame. The economics of office or hotel buildings is probably much different than residential buildings too. I also imagine that many buildings are being financed by/with big funds that aren't tied to interest rates.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3206  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2022, 4:07 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
Risk of falling home prices could make it better to rent than buy in Austin, new study says

https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n...nt-vs-buy.html

Dallas-Fort Worth and Austin both rank in the 10 U.S. housing markets most exposed to price corrections, meaning consumers in Texas’ two fastest-growing metro areas should strongly consider renting rather than buying, according to a new national report.

Austin ranks second-highest in favor of renting and DFW ranks seventh in the study measuring the relative cost of owning to renting in 100 metropolitan areas nationwide.

Spokane, Wash., leads the U.S. with a price-to-rent ratio of 32.1% above the long-term average, according to the BH&J National Price-to-Rent Ratios Monthly Report from researchers at Florida Atlantic University and Florida International University.

Austin came in at No. 2 with a ratio of 29.6% and DFW’s is 23.3%. Houston ranked No. 12 at 22% and San Antonio ranked No. 24 at 18.1%.

People considering buying a house should think twice in markets with high ratios — especially those metros that rank in the top 10, said Ken H. Johnson, an economist in FAU’s College of Business and co-author of the report.

“In markets with these high ratios, it is reasonable to expect price corrections because renting is much more favorable there,” Johnson said. “Renting will slow down demand for homeownership, which will, in turn, affect prices.”

Johnson also co-authors separate monthly indexes revealing the most overvalued U.S. markets for home prices and rents.

The Florida researchers calculate the price-to-rent ratio as the average home price for an area divided by the area’s annual rents for the average property. Data is provided from the Zillow Home Value Index and the Zillow Observed Rental Index, including single-family homes, townhomes, condominiums and apartments.

Also factoring into the buy-versus-rent equation is the supply of apartments in a market. Both Austin and DFW have an abundance of apartments under construction and in the pipeline.

The Austin metro is projected to deliver 18,288 apartments by the end of 2022, according to an August RentCafe repot. That would rank No. 4 in the nation.

Contrary to the Florida researchers’ conclusions, a report released Sept. 15 by property analytics firm Attom Data Solutions ranked major Texas counties as less vulnerable than most in the U.S. to a declining housing market.

In North Texas, Denton County ranked 377th out of the 575 counties studied by Attom for vulnerability during a downturn, followed by Tarrant at 392nd, Dallas at 427th and Collin at 469th. Austin, Houston and San Antonio had similarly low-risk ratings.

The property data provider calculated risk levels by measuring unemployment rates, affordability, foreclosures and the number of homes on which owners owe more on the mortgage than their property is worth.

Attom found the highest concentrations of at-risk markets in the New York City and Chicago areas, with Southern and Midwestern states less exposed to a housing price collapse if a recession occurs.

Wide disparities in risks throughout the country come at a time when the U.S. housing market faces much higher interest rates and other factors that could slow or end an 11-year rise in home prices, said Rick Sharga, executive vice president of market intelligence at Attom.

Sales of both existing and new homes have declined as mortgage rates have almost doubled to 6% over the past year, and inflation remains near a 40-year high.

“The Federal Reserve has promised to be as aggressive as it needs to be in order to get inflation under control, even if its actions lead to a recession,” Sharga said in a statement accompanying the report. “Given how little progress has been made reducing inflation so far, the Fed’s actions seem more and more likely to drive the economy into a recession, and some housing markets are going to be more vulnerable than others if that happens.”

Another study out last week found that home affordability continues to drop sharply in Dallas-Fort Worth and Austin.

The study found Austin ranked 22nd least affordable, Dallas ranked 33rd, Irving ranked 41st, Fort Worth ranked 48th and Arlington ranked 49th among the nation's largest 100 cities, according to the RealtyHop September Affordability Index.

In Austin, 48.4% of homeowners’ median yearly household income is going toward homeownership costs, the study found. In Dallas, 41.9% of yearly household income is going toward homeownership costs.

Irving has 39.3% of yearly household income going toward homeownership, Fort Worth has 37.5%, and Arlington has 37% going toward homeownership costs.

The affordability index in Dallas was based on a median household income of $60,117 and a median home price of $360,000.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3207  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2022, 4:10 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
Commercial parkland fees approved in Austin

Plus: Residential parkland fee to grow 10%

https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n...-approved.html

Commercial real estate developers in Austin will now be required to pay an additional fee that will go toward funding parks, following a Sept. 15 City Council vote.

Council voted to collect commercial parkland fees for the first time. The members also voted to increase the parkland fee for residential development in the next city budget, but only by 10% instead of doubling it.

It represents a victory for those who want to boost funding for parks in the fast growing city. But the fees had been opposed by those concerned about the high cost of real estate development in Austin — which has fees far outpacing those in Texas' other big cities.

"This introduces a new tool for us to be able to provide quality parks to our community and those who work in our community," Mayor Pro Tem Alison Alter said. "Parkland dedication is an established mechanism under law to be able to account for the impact of development on parkland. This will help commercial developments pay their fair share and allow us, most importantly, to provide critical trail connections to some small spaces that will really enhance our ability to provide that quality parkland that is so important for green space."

The parkland fee will be required for new projects that include offices, retail, industrial or hotel rooms. The fee will also be required for projects that require a change in zoning.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3208  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2022, 4:20 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,641
According to the experts at SkyscraperPage, Toronto actually has 82 skyscrapers > 150 m, making it tied with Seoul at 17. They also have 38 u/c, which will put them at 11, ahead of Wuhan and just behind Chicago (assuming those numbers are correct, and nothing is completed in those two cities prior to completion of the 38). They also have a whopping 180 proposals, that if all completed, would put them at #4 just behind New York's current numbers!

Edit: Meanwhile Austin has a current total (built, u/c, proposed) of less than 20, so it will be a long time (if ever) before Austin makes this list.

Last edited by H2O; Sep 19, 2022 at 5:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3209  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2022, 10:24 PM
N90 N90 is offline
Voice of the Modern World
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,106
^^

It’s not likely that Austin will ever get on the list of the Top 25 skyscraper cities in the world by volume of numbers. Those are above 150 meters and while Austin has a growing stock of those in its skyline and is making rapid inroads with many larger peer cities in the US, the rest of the world is just building far more and far quicker than we are. Even the cities towards the bottom of that list are all adding skyscrapers like crazy. Only 2 US cities made the worlds Top 25, NYC and Chicago.

Even Miami, Houston, and LA didn’t make the cut.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3210  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 4:31 AM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
Will Peter Pan Mini-Golf keep flying in modern Austin?

Longtime business' lease expires in about 18 months

https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n...in-future.html

From awkward first dates to trips with the grandkids, Peter Pan Mini-Golf has given Austinites affordable entertainment from its perch on a small hill across the river from downtown for nearly 75 years — and its owners say they are in it for the long haul.

A lot of people hope so. It's one of those iconic Austin businesses that would yield a public outcry if it closed. It's rare to have a quirky, bring-your-own-bottle miniature golf course that puts giant T-Rex and Peter Pan statues next to a world-class skyline. It's just the kind of thing a city needs if it's to be known as weird.

But the fate of Peter Pan will be tested soon. The property is caught up in a Neverland of sorts, somewhere between the public and the private sector, and sometime in the next year or so, the future of the business will be in the hands of the stewards of an unlikely government agency. And so far, there's no telling whether Peter Pan will fly in Austin after 2024 — but the owners have high hopes as a clock ticks in the background.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3211  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 4:58 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,734
https://www.kxan.com/news/local/bast...farm-proposal/

Take a read of the article - and read the whole thing. I don't know much about this project at all. I'm a huge fan of renewable energy and significantly diversifying the grid in lots of ways. However, the property owner quoted in the article was saying that they would cut down a lot of trees for this solar project and that would drastically change the ecological makeup of the area, lead to more flooding, etc. So...I just thought this would be an interesting discussion (and see if anyone knows anything about this project). Cutting down trees in that area for a solar farm does seem silly to me, especially when programs for solar on rooftops are available and could be done more efficiently than is currently available. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3212  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 5:57 PM
lonewolf lonewolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 591
property owner is 100% correct
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3213  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 7:07 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by drummer View Post
https://www.kxan.com/news/local/bast...farm-proposal/

Take a read of the article - and read the whole thing. I don't know much about this project at all. I'm a huge fan of renewable energy and significantly diversifying the grid in lots of ways. However, the property owner quoted in the article was saying that they would cut down a lot of trees for this solar project and that would drastically change the ecological makeup of the area, lead to more flooding, etc. So...I just thought this would be an interesting discussion (and see if anyone knows anything about this project). Cutting down trees in that area for a solar farm does seem silly to me, especially when programs for solar on rooftops are available and could be done more efficiently than is currently available. Thoughts?
removing trees doesn't worsen flooding unless you leave bare dirt. In fact, you can even reduce runoff with rain garden type infrastructure on the perimeter.


Utility solar is way, way better than rooftop solar. More economies of scale in installation and maintenance, and grid connections. They're also doing 400 MW of batteries, which again works better at utility scale.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3214  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 8:14 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
removing trees doesn't worsen flooding unless you leave bare dirt. In fact, you can even reduce runoff with rain garden type infrastructure on the perimeter.


Utility solar is way, way better than rooftop solar. More economies of scale in installation and maintenance, and grid connections. They're also doing 400 MW of batteries, which again works better at utility scale.
I work with batteries as well but I don't know anything about proper runoff control. Hence the question. However, we also want to keep trees...so I'm all for having grid-level solar farms, but is this the best location for it in our area? I suppose there would be a cost/benefit for any location, anywhere. I'm genuinely asking these questions out of curiosity - no agenda here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3215  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 8:50 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
Forecast shows Austin-area population could surpass San Antonio by 2040

https://austin.culturemap.com/news/c...orecast-shows/

No one can gaze into a crystal ball and tell us what the population of the Austin metro area will be two decades from now. Forecasts from professional prognosticators give us a pretty good idea, though.
A CultureMap analysis of the most recent population projections from the Texas Water Development Board, a government agency that helps manage the state’s water supply, shows the Austin area may enter eye-popping territory by 2040. The analysis indicates the population of the Austin metro area will exceed the population of the now-larger San Antonio metro area in just 18 years.
Based on the water board’s county-by-county outlook for Texas, the population of the five-county Austin area will reach 3,340,450 in 2040. By comparison, the population of the eight-county San Antonio area will hit 3,285,451 in 2040, according to the outlook. Some officials, including Austin Mayor Steve Adler, believe the Austin and San Antonio areas are merging into a “metroplex” like Dallas-Fort Worth.
To put these numbers into perspective, the current population of Southern California’s San Diego metro area is around 3.3 million, making it the 17th largest metro in the country. Today, San Antonio ranks as 24th largest U.S. metro, with Austin four spots behind at No. 28.
Adam Perdue, a research economist at Texas A&M University’s Texas Real Estate Research Center, says the prediction that the Austin area’s population will overtake the San Antonio area’s population by 2040 is “reasonable.”
“Austin’s population growth for the last three decades has been much swifter than San Antonio’s. The thing that makes this forecasting difficult is that San Antonio’s growth has been somewhat stable while Austin’s higher growth rate is moderating,” Perdue says.
Perdue questions whether the Austin metro can sustain its higher growth rate, given its “current growing pains.” However, he says, the Austin metro has been outperforming the state’s other major metros over the past two years in terms of housing permits issued per capita. This housing growth “bodes well” for the Austin-surpassing-San Antonio scenario, he notes.
The water board’s forecast shows the San Antonio area will still be larger than the Austin area in 2030 — 2,928,335 residents vs. 2,814,237. But by 2040, the two regions will switch positions, according to the board’s projections. At that point, Austin would be the state’s third largest metro area, and San Antonio would sit at No. 4.
Dallas-Fort Worth ranks as the state’s largest metro and should remain in that position for decades to come. The Houston area almost certainly will remain the state’s second largest metro in the near and distant future.
As of 2021, the population of the San Antonio area was estimated at 2,601,788, compared with 2,352,426 for the Austin area. If the water board’s predictions come true, that population gap would narrow in 2030, and Austin would leapfrog San Antonio in 2040.
In 2050, 2060, and 2070, the population divide between the Austin and San Antonio areas should widen, according to the water board’s numbers. The agency envisions the population of the Austin area climbing past 5 million in 2070 (5,088,247, to be precise), compared with 4,253,684 for San Antonio.
These numbers don’t account for the possibility that the federal government will add counties to the Austin metro area or San Antonio metro area based on updated U.S. Census Bureau head counts.
The federal government defines a metro area as “a core area containing a substantial population nucleus, together with adjacent communities having a high degree of economic and social integration with that core.” So, if the federal government determined a county that’s now outside the Austin or San Antonio metro area had become more economically and socially integrated, it could attach that county to what’s currently the five-county Austin area or the eight-county San Antonio area.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3216  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 11:07 PM
lonewolf lonewolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
removing trees doesn't worsen flooding unless you leave bare dirt.
you are implying that the water storage capability in grass and its roots systems is equivalent to that of trees?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3217  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2022, 11:53 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonewolf View Post
you are implying that the water storage capability in grass and its roots systems is equivalent to that of trees?
Pretty similar, especially when properly designed and managed.

Trees on the other hand can actually make flooding worse, if limbs and debris fill or obstruct streams and creeks. That’s why Austin actually actively clears such from creeks to help prevent flooding.
I’m guessing the current unused, unincorporated land doesn’t have much active management
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3218  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2022, 3:08 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin,TX<-->Dripping Springs,TX<-->Birmingham, AL<-->Warm Springs,GA
Posts: 57,205
https://www.kxan.com/news/local/aust...-year-history/
Quote:
UT Tower to be upgraded for first time in its 85-year history

by: Abigail Jones
Posted: Sep 20, 2022 / 09:05 PM CDT
Updated: Sep 20, 2022 / 09:05 PM CDT

AUSTIN (KXAN) — University of Texas President Jay Hartzell gave the annual State of The University Address Tuesday afternoon. He talked about record-breaking enrollment, but something that’s also record-breaking is planned renovation for the UT Tower.

It’ll be the first time in the tower’s 85-year history that it’s upgraded.

Hartzell said an announcement is expected to come from Chairman Kevin Eltife and the UT System Board of Regents about a future restoration and renovation project on the Tower.
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3219  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2022, 10:21 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,594
https://imgur.com/gallery/Dgj2na4

This is really cool.
__________________
UnitedStateser

Last edited by kingkirbythe....; Sep 24, 2022 at 3:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3220  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2022, 1:30 AM
N90 N90 is offline
Voice of the Modern World
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,106
Skyscrapers over 500+ feet

Miami: 66 (60 built | +6 u/c)
Houston: 37 (35 built | +2 u/c)
Los Angeles: 31 (27 built | +4 u/c)
San Francisco 25 (25 built | 0 u/c)
Boston: 23 (20 built | +3 u/c)
Seattle: 21 (20 built | 0 u/c)
Dallas: 20 (20 built | 0 u/c)
Atlanta: 19 (19 built | 0 u/c)
Austin: 18 (9 built | +9 u/c)
Las Vegas: 15 (15 built | 0 u/c)
Philly: 15 (13 built | +2 u/c)
Pittsburgh: 11 (11 built | 0 u/c)
Minneapolis: 10 (9 built | +1 u/c)
Detroit: 9 (8 built | +1 u/c)
Charlotte: 8 (7 built | +1 u/c)
Denver: 8 (8 built | 0 u/c)
Baltimore: 4 (4 built | 0 u/c)
Portland: 3 (3 built | 0 u/c)
St. Louis: 3 (3 built | 0 u/c)
San Diego: 1 (1 built | 0 u/c)

By the end of this decade in 2029 Austin will either be between Houston and LA or between Miami and Houston on this list. And all of Austin’s 500 footers will be in downtown or directly adjacent neighborhoods.

Last edited by N90; Sep 28, 2022 at 1:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:04 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.