HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 8:14 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Via Chicago View Post
A) heroin is merely one drug. True, I dont know many casual users although I suppose some might exist. There are plenty of casual users of other drugs though. Pot, LSD, MDMA, and all sorts of others are used regularly by people from all walks of life.

B) I agree. Hence why I said those responsible for enacting policies that led to a "war on drugs" are complicit in today's current situation.
...
I am pro-legalization not just to stop the violence, but to stop the destruction of lives. A very large portion of the harms of drug abuse comes from the legal consequences and not the medical consequences. If, instead of spending on law enforcement, we spend on social and medical mitigation like treatment or detox, we would save money, we would have fewer negatives for users, and the criminal allure of drugs as (il)legal rebellion would be greatly reduced.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
Blaming these problems on demand is the silliest thing I've ever heard:

A. It's not as if most people going to pick up some smack are just casual users out to grab some drugs before a long night of partying on their investment banker yacht. Once you are using Heroin you are hooked, period. The first bag is free, the second is $10, and the more you buy, the higher the unit price goes. Drug dealer economics 101. Step 1: push drugs with a loss leader Step 2: ??? Step 3: Jack the prices up once your customer is hooked. Step 4: Profit. Most of the people being blamed by Via for this are not casual consumers from the suburbs, they are hooked and blowing thousands of dollars irrationally because the reward center of their brain is royally fucked with chemicals.
1) Somewhere around 10-15% of of people who try heroin get hooked. If *everyone* tried heroin, the number would probably be lower than 5% - I think it's in the 10-15% range only because the stigma around heroin means those who try it are much more predicated toward addiction and/or lack the self-discipline necessary to prevent physical dependency from occurring (and recurring). I know people who have used heroin recreationally and never suffered from addiction. They're even known among addicts as "weekend warriors" because they only use on the weekends so that they don't build up a tolerance and don't string together enough days to become physically dependent and suffer withdrawal pains.

2) While some dealers will start someone out with a free trial bag, the price of heroin is competively set like in any other marketplace. If a dealer started overcharging an addict, the addict would find another source - they tend to be quite price-sensitive out of necessity. In Chicago, the minimum size in most areas is a dime-bag, $10. I think it's currently more common to see "dubs" (as in double), which are $20. For $100 you can get a "jab," which is between 10-13 dime-bags worth. Some dealers will sell "halves," which are advertised as half-grams of heroin, which, when available, usually have the equivalent of 6 dimebags or 3 dubs and run $50, but that's less common. If someone buys a "gram," it'll be between $120 and $200 depending on the dealer. Part of the variation there is because a "gram" will either be an uncut or nearly uncut chunk of heroin off a full brick which might weight close to a gram, or it will be about 1.4 grams of the same powder that comes in dime-bags. Buying more than a gram at a time is not usually a large part of a dealer's business unless they're up the chain and selling to lower dealers. This system and prices are pretty consistent across Chicago. There is some variation in how cut (or "stepped-on") stuff is depending on the dealer, and variation is greater in the suburbs, too, but those are the prices and they mostly only vary in special circumstances.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
B. Demand will never go away. Look at Prohibition, look at the War on Drugs. The drug markets in these areas aren't there because evil whiteys from the suburbs want black people to do their dirty work for them so they can have their party drugs. They are there because demand for these substances exists whether the government likes it or not. Banning the substances (rather than decriminalizing and treating) simply drives the prices up and the activity underground. That turns the marketplace into a perfect breeding ground of organized crime and it at the very core of what has destroyed Black America since the 1960's and 70's when Nixon had a hard on for "law and order".


Point being, blaming demand is never a solution and any attempt to curtail demand usually just results in even more negative consequences. The best things we could do as a nation to resolve this problem permanently would be widespread criminal reform in regards to drug crimes combined with actual Federal laws protecting the rights of poor individuals to use their housing vouchers in any community they desire. If we could simultaneously undermine the business model of street gangs and spread out the impoverished to communities that can better serve their needs, then we would start making real progress towards finally integrating African Americans into American society after 100+ years of claiming that's what we want to do while passing legions of laws that suggest otherwise.
Demand will never completely go away. There are still drug black markets in totalitarian governments. That should tell us something about whether the "war on drugs" is even worth fighting, let alone winnable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ No, my problem is with your (and others who make this argument) continued insistence on blaming white people for the actions of thugs.
...
I am not to blame for their existence, although I understand that they are employed within the illegal drug trade. A hell of a lot of people don't do drugs either. Stop trying to make everybody feel guilty.
I think you're the one making it racial. I don't read the other comments as "blaming white people," I read them as acknowledging two things:

1) People who use drugs and who live outside of the geography of active drug markets continuing to buy in them and essentially putting financial incentive on the conditions there to be what they are.

2) People who don't use drugs and live outside of the geography of active drug markets failing to understand that the "war on drugs" basically guarantees the results we've seen and so continuing the laws that have created violent drug black markets.

Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ No, your worldview is one where you create a victim complex. The world has been rigged since humans settled into cities.

But let's not be enablers of people who murder. You want me to feel sorry for them. I just plain don't.
No one is asking you to feel sorry for them, but it would be helpful in stopping the violence to actively acknowledge that the current system greatly contributes to not only enabling but actually encouraging the situations that lead to the violence.

If you hate the violence and actually want it to stop instead of simply bitching about murderers, then you and people like you need to start *actively* petitioning government to change its strategy. Yes, the murders do ultimately happen due to personal moral failings by the murderers. But the current system motivates them to be more evil than they might otherwise be.

Your choice is to acknowledge that the current system greatly contributes to the violence and act based on that to help stop the violence, or to simply moralize and pretend there's nothing that can be done and continue to live watching those murders.

Your choice, U.P.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2016, 5:58 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,329
^ Damn right it's my choice. You don't have to be a criminal and shoot other people.

Put them in jail. They are the scum of the earth. Stop feeling sorry for scoundrels.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2016, 4:03 PM
chiphile's Avatar
chiphile chiphile is offline
yes
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: chicago
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ Damn right it's my choice. You don't have to be a criminal and shoot other people.

Put them in jail. They are the scum of the earth. Stop feeling sorry for scoundrels.


Seriously. I understand gangs are the symptoms of systematic racism and other structural things from the past and present--but sometimes the symptoms metastasize into a cancer. You can have "demand" due to drugs and other things, and a barbaric culture, at the SAME TIME.

[I can't stand how in any American political discussion, when the answer most certainly is both, you have to choose one side and shout "THIS" is the cause for everything. Ridiculous]

Some academic documentation of this barbaric culture:

DISPATCHES FROM THE RAP WARS

BY FORREST STUART
Chicago Magazine
http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/October-2016/Chicago-Gangs/

"Each rapper has one or two 'shooters.' These are the members who make good on the threats the rappers dish out in their lyrics and on social media. And, yes, that means shooting—and sometimes killing—people. CBE has about a dozen shooters."

"I began to wrap up my research this summer. CBE is now locked in an incredibly bloody war with a neighboring gang called the Pharaohs. The whole thing started because of a personal rift between two members. Who knows what they butted heads over, but it could have been as trivial as one of them failing to pass a blunt. That feud led CBE to shoot and kill a Pharaoh. The Pharaohs then declared a full-blown war on CBE and put bounties on the heads of every CBE rapper. I’ve also heard they’ve put bounties on anyone who affiliates with CBE. That’s when I decided it was probably time to conclude my research."


The above has nothing to do with selling drugs (or bullshit about demand), AT ALL. It's about rapping, insulting other barbarians with your rap songs, or insulting in another way, and then shooting in retaliation.

I wouldn't mind if they were good shots and only killed each other. We'd have a great city in ten years. The problem is they suck and have no aim because they're high all the time and end up shooting kids.

All of this is bullshit, and I'm tired of the liberal excuses for these animals (I worked for the Obama campaign so stop right there).

Police brutality is an awful issue and needs to be addressed, and nationwide, Black Lives Matter is an important movement. But here in Chicago it appears only certain black lives matter, not all black lives matter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 4:36 AM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ Damn right it's my choice. You don't have to be a criminal and shoot other people.

Put them in jail. They are the scum of the earth. Stop feeling sorry for scoundrels.
I never said they weren't scoundrels. I never said that we should go easy or excuse murderers. Don't make up my positions to avoid acknowledging your personal responsibility in allowing the current situation to continue.

The US already locks up a greater percentage of our population than any other country on earth. Less than half of all murders are solved. We need a different approach because yelling "lock them up" isn't working. We need a different approach because you can either believe that some huge percentage of our citizens are just naturally evil people, or you can look at the facts and realize that the current system is making people evil. You can acknowledge that without excusing the behavior of individuals. It isn't in anyone's best interest to excuse bad behavior of individuals, but it's also not in anyone's interest to allow the current situation to continue.

It's not safe. It's not fair. It's not, by any definition, the kind of freedom this country was founded for. Racism plays into it. Economic inequity plays into it.

We can't make a perfect world, but we can make this world better. But in order to do that, people have to stop pretending that making something illegal fixes things. It doesn't and sometimes, it makes things worse.

Stop saying that pro-legalization people are "excusing" individual choices. We're not. What we are saying is that the laws aren't working, aren't enforceable, aren't effective and are causing way more problems than they're fixing. Legalization cuts the profit motive away. It cuts away stigmas that put people into positions where making a bad choice may actually benefit them more than making a good choice.

And, best of all, it makes us all freer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 1:56 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by emathias View Post
I never said they weren't scoundrels. I never said that we should go easy or excuse murderers. Don't make up my positions to avoid acknowledging your personal responsibility in allowing the current situation to continue.
^ I stopped reading after this statement. Go have a powwow with your white guilt liberal brethren, but leave me out. My people did nothing to anybody, hell we were British subjects for 150 years. Screw this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 3:28 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,443
Well we know why everyone hates Rahm, he's cutting everyone's pork. The 2017 budget he proposed today reduces the deficit to $138 million on a total budget just shy of $10 billion. Compare that with the $600 million + mess we were in when he took office. Some of it is through slashing waste, much of it is from raising taxes, but Chicago is looking like it is headed towards solvency for the first time in decades.



http://www.bondbuyer.com/news/regionalne...city-back-on-solid-ground-1115605-1.html

Sorry for the wonky source, but all the new outlets are just talking about all the bullshit programs that will be funded and not actually talking about the numbers. I couldn't find a single source that actually mentioned what the projected deficit was except for "bondbuyer.com" lol. Pathetic reporting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2016, 4:00 PM
Vlajos Vlajos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
Well we know why everyone hates Rahm, he's cutting everyone's pork. The 2017 budget he proposed today reduces the deficit to $138 million on a total budget just shy of $10 billion. Compare that with the $600 million + mess we were in when he took office. Some of it is through slashing waste, much of it is from raising taxes, but Chicago is looking like it is headed towards solvency for the first time in decades.



http://www.bondbuyer.com/news/regionalne...city-back-on-solid-ground-1115605-1.html

Sorry for the wonky source, but all the new outlets are just talking about all the bullshit programs that will be funded and not actually talking about the numbers. I couldn't find a single source that actually mentioned what the projected deficit was except for "bondbuyer.com" lol. Pathetic reporting.
Thanks for posting this. Rahm has done a pretty good job getting the city's finances in better shape. Though the CTU/CPS agreement appears to be a complete cave to the union, which will have terrible long term consequences on the City and its taxpayers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2016, 10:27 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
Some of it is through slashing waste, much of it is from raising taxes, but Chicago is looking like it is headed towards solvency for the first time in decades.
Well, at least $88M of that budget is from raiding the TIF funds to pay teacher salaries.

It's a pretty basic principle of accounting that you don't pay for ongoing costs with one-time revenues. It's a band-aid solution. Not really any better than borrowing the money.

Meanwhile that TIF money could be spent to actually invest in neighborhoods through capital projects. Admittedly $88 million doesn't go very far, maybe two new L stations or two new schools, but it could also be invested in small neighborhood-level projects, beautification, etc.

This is just like how Daley pissed away the $1.2B we received from the parking meter lease. With a frugal spending plan, that much money could build out a city-wide BRT network, by eliminating parking spots instead of travel lanes. Instead Daley just shoveled it to special interest groups so he could keep everyone happy and avoid tough decisions.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2016, 4:53 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Well, at least $88M of that budget is from raiding the TIF funds to pay teacher salaries.

It's a pretty basic principle of accounting that you don't pay for ongoing costs with one-time revenues. It's a band-aid solution. Not really any better than borrowing the money.

Meanwhile that TIF money could be spent to actually invest in neighborhoods through capital projects. Admittedly $88 million doesn't go very far, maybe two new L stations or two new schools, but it could also be invested in small neighborhood-level projects, beautification, etc.

This is just like how Daley pissed away the $1.2B we received from the parking meter lease. With a frugal spending plan, that much money could build out a city-wide BRT network, by eliminating parking spots instead of travel lanes. Instead Daley just shoveled it to special interest groups so he could keep everyone happy and avoid tough decisions.
The nice thing about TIF is that it is not a one time line item. It's an ongoing accumulation of property taxes in a fund that can be used to complete one time improvements. So while I don't support raiding TIF to throw a bone to Karen Lewis, it's not money that won't build up again like the meter deal.

The nice thing is, despite the latest deal with the CTU, Rahm is gradually grinding down the moochers and cleaning house. At this point he is pushing a relentless March towards fiscal solvency which is more important than how much more in taxes I pay or how many teachers get laid off. Once we are solvent, then we can talk about improving services and really addressing other long term issues we face. But we need to stop burning millions on forbearance of debt and interest first.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2016, 8:18 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
The nice thing about TIF is that it is not a one time line item. It's an ongoing accumulation of property taxes in a fund that can be used to complete one time improvements. So while I don't support raiding TIF to throw a bone to Karen Lewis, it's not money that won't build up again like the meter deal.
Potentially. For 2017, all TIF districts are projected to bring in close to $400M, and there are $150M being used to patch the hole at CPS in 2017.

So, yes, you could continue to patch the CPS hole every year using TIF money. But when you factor in all of the committed projects for 2017, there's only $35M in actual surplus available to be used. So the $150M is either four years' worth of surplus being spent in one year, or it is $115M of committed projects that will now be canceled or postponed.

I'm not trying to get super wonky (or maybe I am), but TIF is a crucial economic development tool for a city that never gets enough resources from Springfield or Washington. Now $150M of important infrastructure and econ-dev projects just won't get done next year. To put in in perspective, that's probably enough money to eliminate all the slow zones on CTA at once. All I can hope is that this is a one-year tactical move by Rahm to build political capital before raising new revenues/raising taxes again next year.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2016, 2:53 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,940
^ That article is very suspicious to me. The author changed literally every proper name in the story, which means it is not falsifiable.

The author could have written literally anything he wanted to, and there would be no way to prove him wrong.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...

Last edited by ardecila; Sep 25, 2016 at 3:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2016, 11:42 PM
chicagogreg chicagogreg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
^ That article is very suspicious to me. The author changed literally every proper name in the story, which means it is not falsifiable.

The author could have written literally anything he wanted to, and there would be no way to prove him wrong.
The author is a professor at U of C. Not that his position necessarily frees his work from scrutiny, but I would tend to trust his academic integrity...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 4:25 PM
chiphile's Avatar
chiphile chiphile is offline
yes
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: chicago
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
^ That article is very suspicious to me. The author changed literally every proper name in the story, which means it is not falsifiable.

The author could have written literally anything he wanted to, and there would be no way to prove him wrong.
The flagship magazine of the Tribune and a U of C professor are suspicious? No response needed.

This rap war nonsense has been well-documented before, this is just one in-depth article. Other documentaries (including the BBC one) and stories discuss this too. The only problem is they make it seem like bad weather or some other unlucky circumstance, as opposed to pointing out the obvious and apparent barbarity of the rap/hood culture.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 5:15 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiphile View Post
The flagship magazine of the Tribune and a U of C professor are suspicious? No response needed.

This rap war nonsense has been well-documented before, this is just one in-depth article. Other documentaries (including the BBC one) and stories discuss this too. The only problem is they make it seem like bad weather or some other unlucky circumstance, as opposed to pointing out the obvious and apparent barbarity of the rap/hood culture.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and this story provides absolutely zero personal or geographic details that could be used to verify anything.

But let's assume it is true. That means these clowns are not primarily engaged in the sale of drugs. They're just wannabe rappers who use violence to build street cred, and often pay for it with their lives or kill innocents in the process. The reason they can do this is because people in America and elsewhere who lead normal lives are consuming this music.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 7:51 PM
chiphile's Avatar
chiphile chiphile is offline
yes
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: chicago
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and this story provides absolutely zero personal or geographic details that could be used to verify anything.

But let's assume it is true. That means these clowns are not primarily engaged in the sale of drugs. They're just wannabe rappers who use violence to build street cred, and often pay for it with their lives or kill innocents in the process. The reason they can do this is because people in America and elsewhere who lead normal lives are consuming this music.
No, No, and No. There are no consumers of this music in the sense people pay for this, these guys upload directly to youtube and facebook--both platforms don't pay much in terms of views or ad revenue unless you get tens of millions of hits, which these guys don't. The ONLY reason they "can do this" is because all you need is a smartphone and a laptop to produce a music video and upload to the internet. That's it. Now, if a record label signs up one of these goons, they should be prosecuted under RICO for affiliating with organized crime. That talentless punk "Chief-Kief" got signed in a similar way--someone should go after that label.

Most mass consumers of music are listening to decent guys like Chance the Rapper--who is anything but a gang banger and a great voice for Chicago. Being successful in anything requires some degree of socialization to human norms. These banger kids have no hope for that.

Your insane demand-side economics theory on all this is just excuses, and if you apply it anywhere else you'll see how stupid it sounds. Is child porn the fault of the demand for those videos, or those who actually produce it and harm children? Is sex trafficking the fault of those who create demand by seeking out prostitutes, or those who kidnap girls and make them slaves?

You can't say with a straight face that more than 50% of the fault, in the above examples, lies with the consumers of those illegal products. Most "consumers" of those things would simply move on and not avail themselves of such things if those products did not exist, because most people, even vile consumers of child porn, aren't willing to commit the crimes necessary for their product. In the same way, if this trash rap from Chicago were never produced, those youtube viewers would simply move on.

Anyway, I'm willing to concede structural inequities and other systematic problems, because those are facts, but to pin THIS - this insane rap culture - on those other than the perpetrators, shows me that you won't assign personal responsibility for anything on these goons. That I cannot accept.

Assuming you have the sense to know that complex social issues have multiple causes, how much are you willing to allocate to culture and values? Generally, I say 60/40. 60% of the problems in the south and west sides are structural and come from a legacy of exclusion, redlining, de-industrialization, poverty, the drug war (and its associated gangs), and direct racism which has decimated those neighborhoods, while keeping those residents out of the suburbs (and the jobs that went there too); while 40% is due to insane bastard child birth rates, declining morals and values due to decreased church/mosque attendance and other socialization factors, and an overall coarseness of culture (sagging pants, vulgarity) and other things that degrade neighborhoods and community and generally make people unemployable and reliant on the state.

However, for this rap stuff, it's 90/10 in my book. 90% barbaric culture of insulting others and then shooting them, and often missing and killing children. 10% everything else.

Assuming all of this could be resolved by some mythical $1 billion program (probably in the hundreds of billions, but for easy math), how much are you willing to allocate to fight those above issues? Would you spend that entire $1 billion on dissuading middle class consumers from watching rap videos on youtube? Or would you split 50/50 and allocate $500 million to address systemic issues and another $500 million on socialization programs (including birth control?). Putting it all in one basket is stupid.

Last edited by chiphile; Sep 26, 2016 at 8:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2016, 10:08 PM
jpIllInoIs's Avatar
jpIllInoIs jpIllInoIs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,227
Chicago State U enrolls only 86 freshman

Chicago SunTimes

Quote:
Chicago State University — still reeling from a scandal in which its president got $600,000 in severance to leave the South Side school after only nine months on the job — has only 86 total students in its freshman class this fall.

That’s less than a tenth the size of its freshman class five years ago, when 1,058 first-year students enrolled, university figures show. And the 86 freshmen now on campus include part-time and full-time students, a university spokeswoman said.
I'm posting this in politics section because ultimately any solutions will be so riddled with political grappling and so far removed from economic sensibilities that it doesn't deserve to be discussed in the Chicago Econ thread.

With 86 new freshman and no President and no budget- CSU looks doomed.

I would fold it into the City Colleges program right now and put the campus up for sale. And of course we just built a brand new Malcolm X up the Dan Ryan which could have been merged into this space.

As for the pharmacy school- Send it to UIC or to City Colleges also.

I know there are different Board of Regents running the aforementioned schools,,,thus the political discussion designation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2016, 10:35 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiphile View Post
Assuming all of this could be resolved by some mythical $1 billion program (probably in the hundreds of billions, but for easy math), how much are you willing to allocate to fight those above issues? Would you spend that entire $1 billion on dissuading middle class consumers from watching rap videos on youtube? Or would you split 50/50 and allocate $500 million to address systemic issues and another $500 million on socialization programs (including birth control?). Putting it all in one basket is stupid.
If I had a billion to throw at the problem, it would all go towards a focused campaign to crush the NRA and institute common-sense gun control measures. Or, hell, repeal the 2nd Amendment. A billion is a colossal amount of money in political-spending terms, it would equal NRA's entire budget for four whole years.

Maybe throw 5% of that billion at civilian-driven programs like CeaseFire which aim to stop gun violence while ignoring drug dealing and other nonviolent crime. It's ultimately a stopgap but it does seem to work in the short term...
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2016, 10:21 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,940
^ The new Malcolm X is designed to feed into the Illinois Medical Center and includes specialized facilities for medical training. It's also centrally located in the city and right next to public transit, so it serves folks on the West Side and North Side equally to the South Side. Plus it serves redevelopment goals in Near West Side. How is a sprawling, outdated campus at 95th and King with no L access a good substitute?

The reality is that Chicago State in its present form was designed to serve a black middle class that no longer exists on the south side; there's a small community left in Bronzeville/Kenwood, but the rest of the South Side is emptying out either to the south suburbs or to cities like Atlanta and Houston. Plus, the cat's out of the bag that CSU offers a shitty education, even to those students who need extensive remedial studies. Governors State, or various for-profit schools, are now the education of choice for the black students that used to be CSU's bread and butter.

Meanwhile, CSU's traditional role as a teachers' college for the inner city has been shaken by big changes in the training process for new teachers. Teach for America offers a pipeline for young people from across the country to teach in the inner-city, new charter schools in the K-12 space recruit nationally instead of from local/traditional sources of teachers, and other institutions like Northeastern and NIU have stepped onto CSU's turf and beaten them at their own game.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...

Last edited by ardecila; Sep 27, 2016 at 10:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2016, 1:05 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,358
I'm expecting that Rahm will get some of that back by further closures due to declines in enrollment. Cuts that aren't prohibited under the contract.

While not wild about raiding some of the TIF funds the overall amount doesn't concern me that much. Politically he needed a little breathing room after raising taxes so substanitally and a CPS strike wasn't going to provide that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2016, 2:52 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,329
Yeah the best solution is to close another 50 schools.

Actually just close them all. Who cares about public schools in the city? Everybody knows that you either go private or to the burbs. Public schools in Chicago are just a safety net thing as well as adult payroll dispensaries for remaining CTU members.

If you really wanna raise your kids in the city on the cheap, home school them. Oh wait, I'm sure the CTU somehow got that outlawed through their tool in Madiganistan
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:53 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.