HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #301  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2014, 11:26 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by biguc View Post
Also, how about manufacturing takes advantage of the other kind of infrastructure that carves up our city and is, really, the whole reason this city exists? Good old rail.
Fabricate details in St. James and ship them by rail to Transcona for assembly?

Rail was abandoned 40 years ago for this purpose as it is far too slow and cumbersome. For JIT it would be the last choice in every case.

Rail is really only good for containerized overseas and bulk shipments like crude oil, coal and grain.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #302  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2014, 11:32 PM
rypinion's Avatar
rypinion rypinion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Exchange, Winnipeg
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman View Post
Fabricate details in St. James and ship them ... to Transcona for assembly
Do companies do this? Do they own both fabrication and assembly? If so that seems way inefficient.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #303  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2014, 11:47 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
Sometimes, but I was referring to sub-contract fabrication which is done extensively here and everywhere.

Chrysler Corp. for example is in the business of designing, assembling and marketing automobiles. They do not make any of their own parts.

Last edited by Riverman; Feb 6, 2014 at 12:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #304  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2014, 12:35 AM
Chrisforpm Chrisforpm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 106
I was recently in Bridgewater Forest and I noticed that they have put up a new set of traffic lights at North Town Road and the future Kenaston Blvd expansion. They are the same style lights as at Donald and Graham (straight arm). Does anyone know if the city is changing the style of traffic signals to this design?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #305  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2014, 9:22 PM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrisforpm View Post
I was recently in Bridgewater Forest and I noticed that they have put up a new set of traffic lights at North Town Road and the future Kenaston Blvd expansion. They are the same style lights as at Donald and Graham (straight arm). Does anyone know if the city is changing the style of traffic signals to this design?
Yes they are going to a new style of signal pole and ped corridor pole, they tendered for the new style a few months ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #306  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2014, 9:50 PM
JDSunny JDSunny is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrisforpm View Post
I was recently in Bridgewater Forest and I noticed that they have put up a new set of traffic lights at North Town Road and the future Kenaston Blvd expansion. They are the same style lights as at Donald and Graham (straight arm). Does anyone know if the city is changing the style of traffic signals to this design?
That style of straight angle post gas been the staple for most of Western Canada, Ontario and the US for many years now, even in any parts of Manitoba outside of Winnipeg. Winnipeg itself has a unique style of traffic light post, with several bends and angles that makes us unique with regards to traffic light post style in North America, although I have seen them in European cities a few times. I'm kind of sad they will be phasing them out to look like everywhereelsenoethamerica (especially Ontario it just has that look to it), but what can you do.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #307  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2014, 10:41 PM
Chrisforpm Chrisforpm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by cllew View Post
Yes they are going to a new style of signal pole and ped corridor pole, they tendered for the new style a few months ago.
So far I've only seen them with one traffic light on them. I wonder if they will eventually have multiple lights mounted on one arm at larger intersections?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #308  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2014, 10:52 PM
JDSunny JDSunny is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 37
If they are going to go this new route with the traffic light posts, I wouldn't mind seeing them mount the light horizontally like they do in the rest of the prairies. I find it suits straight arm posts much nicer than vertically mounted lights.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #309  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2014, 12:03 AM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,179
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #310  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2014, 1:20 AM
Chrisforpm Chrisforpm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 106
Thanks for posting that. I do like the dual light heads, especially for wider streets such as Bishop and Kenaston.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #311  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2014, 1:57 AM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,179
I wonder if they will also order the old style for traffic accident replacements? If not we could see both the new and old style poles at the same intersection next winter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #312  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2014, 6:54 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
This is pretty good:

Vandal playing politics with Provencher truck route issue

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opi...243907201.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #313  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2014, 7:19 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman View Post
This is pretty good:

Vandal playing politics with Provencher truck route issue

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opi...243907201.html
So according to the Trucking Association, we should continue to hold back the potential of a major urban neighbourhood so that big trucks don't have to bother taking an inconvenient detour on their way to Transcona.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #314  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2014, 7:29 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
So according to the Trucking Association, we should continue to hold back the potential of a major urban neighbourhood so that big trucks don't have to bother taking an inconvenient detour on their way to Transcona.
As I read it the article is more about the report, as done by a professional engineer, saying that eliminating the truck route is a bad idea.

The street in itself is a perfect truck route - nice and wide, wide medians with lots of room for trucks to turn. As far as developing a walkable street is concerned, Marion is a far better choice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #315  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2014, 8:13 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman View Post
As I read it the article is more about the report, as done by a professional engineer, saying that eliminating the truck route is a bad idea.

The street in itself is a perfect truck route - nice and wide, wide medians with lots of room for trucks to turn. As far as developing a walkable street is concerned, Marion is a far better choice.
Sometimes when making these kinds of decisions, you have to take into account considerations beyond those related strictly to engineering and transportaiton. I'm sure that a traffic engineer would recommend a relatively simple solution to rush hour traffic jams in Osborne Village... just demolish the buildings along either side of Osborne, expand the road to 8 lanes and boom... a perfect engineering solution. However, that won't make Winnipeg a better place.

Same with Provencher. Is shutting it down to trucks going to impress engineers or win friends among truckers? No. But who cares, some things are more important than either of those are.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #316  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2014, 9:22 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,015
provonchea dead ends into a industrial park
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #317  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2014, 1:08 AM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
I'm sure that a traffic engineer would recommend a relatively simple solution to rush hour traffic jams in Osborne Village... just demolish the buildings along either side of Osborne, expand the road to 8 lanes and boom... a perfect engineering solution.

You're sure of that? I'm sure engineers are a lot more creative than that. In fact, what you have said is just silly.


Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Same with Provencher. Is shutting it down to trucks going to impress engineers or win friends among truckers? No. But who cares, some things are more important than either of those are.

It's not about impressing anybody.The study was commissioned by Vandal himself and it showed that he was wrong. There is no reason to support changing Provencher from what it is when there is a far superior street for shops, bars etc, in Marion. Removing trucks from Marion makes far more sense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #318  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2014, 6:03 AM
Bdog's Avatar
Bdog Bdog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman View Post
Removing trucks from Marion makes far more sense.
Really? With the Dugald-Marion alignment currently in the works, and basically running through the heart of the St. B industrial park, it seems like Marion would make more sense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #319  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2014, 4:39 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Reg: Traffic Lights

Officials say employees in the public works department have been testing a number of products to better protect the electrical connections, and have settled upon a gel-like waterproof cover.

Up to 80 locations will be outfited with the new covers this year, with the tentative plan being to add the waterproof covers at all 645 signalized intersections next year. The total cost is estimated at $550,000, city officials said.
-SunMedia

Seems like a reasonable solution. I don't have any experience in this field. Does it seem like a plausible solution ? Cost affective?
__________________
♥ ♥
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #320  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2014, 3:58 PM
alittle1 alittle1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 446
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyro View Post
Reg: Traffic Lights

Officials say employees in the public works department have been testing a number of products to better protect the electrical connections, and have settled upon a gel-like waterproof cover.

Up to 80 locations will be outfited with the new covers this year, with the tentative plan being to add the waterproof covers at all 645 signalized intersections next year. The total cost is estimated at $550,000, city officials said.
-SunMedia

Seems like a reasonable solution. I don't have any experience in this field. Does it seem like a plausible solution ? Cost affective?
Well, well, isn't that typical of Winnipeg, putting a French safe on a electrical connection where a Bandaid just did fine for years. I wonder if they have them in different colors? $550,000 for that??????
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:45 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.