HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #31581  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2015, 9:12 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,623
more garbage

also, what does, "redevelopment" entail for the Germania?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31582  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2015, 9:24 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
^ It's crap in style of course, but I really want to see North Avenue framed better with taller buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31583  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2015, 5:58 PM
IrishIllini IrishIllini is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,189
Cabrini Green Redevelopment Bids

Any one hear of any news on the Cabrini Green redevelopment bids that were scheduled to open Summer 2015?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31584  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2015, 6:28 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,442
^ No, nothing yet. CHA still hasn't even released their RFP for developers.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31585  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2015, 8:18 PM
IrishIllini IrishIllini is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
^ No, nothing yet. CHA still hasn't even released their RFP for developers.
Thanks for the response. Not sure if that's good news or not. Anyone have any insight as to why the RFPs have been delayed? Is it because of lack of interest due to the ARO/public housing? Lots of $$$ homes in the surrounding area...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31586  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2015, 9:49 PM
Tom Servo's Avatar
Tom Servo Tom Servo is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
According to Curbed, the Logan Square megamall project was approved by the plan commission (http://chicago.curbed.com/archives/2...ember-2015.php).

Also, for the building at North & Clark. There was concern over this that the Village Theater would be torn down. Here's a render though. MEH:

Is this a joke?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31587  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2015, 10:31 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Servo View Post
Is this a joke?
I wish - that building is really, really bad.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31588  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2015, 1:48 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,157
That redevelopment of the building on Huron between LaSalle and Wells seems to be coming soon,the Blue Frog bar in the back of it just posted a last day sign for Jan 16.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31589  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2015, 1:50 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by emathias View Post
That redevelopment of the building on Huron between LaSalle and Wells seems to be coming soon,the Blue Frog bar in the back of it just posted a last day sign for Jan 16.
I'm trying to remember this project. Any renderings?

Edit: nevermind, here is the link. Good to see that a parking lot will bite the dust:

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/reale...in-river-north
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31590  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2015, 2:41 PM
VKChaz VKChaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California
Posts: 587
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
I wish - that building is really, really bad.
Juxtaposed with Germania and Village, this building will appear especially weak. Pomo in this location needed to be much better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31591  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2015, 2:43 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,892
These just got a building permit. 830 N Milwaukee - 47 units + retail:

__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31592  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2015, 9:28 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,433
Another TargetExpress incoming

Target Replacing Best Buy In Lincoln Park Storefront
Quote:
By Joe Ward | December 22, 2015 2:35pm
CHICAGO — Target will take over the Best Buy storefront in Lincoln Park, opening its newest Chicago location in July 2016, the chain retailer said Tuesday.

The Minneapolis-based retailer announced that it will take over the space at 2650 N. Clark St., just south of Diversey Parkway. The announcement comes as Target continues to invest heavily in Chicago and other urban markets.
http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20151...ark-storefront
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31593  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2015, 10:08 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
This little blurb from the City of Chicago's website:

Quote:
The School of the Art Institute is moving forward with its plan for a $14 million integrated campus building in the South Loop. The school will also continue its College Arts Access Program and Inside Innovative Minds program for CPS students.

“We understand the value of investing in our neighborhoods, and we are committed to providing access to world-class creative and cultural opportunities for the residents of Chicago,” said Paul Coffey, vice provost and dean of community engagement.
^ I wonder if that is the site on south State St, just south of the University center. If so, I'm a bit disappointed since a $14 million project will likely be relatively small.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31594  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2015, 3:48 AM
Loopy's Avatar
Loopy Loopy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 665
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
I wonder if that is the site on south State St, just south of the University center. If so, I'm a bit disappointed since a $14 million project will likely be relatively small.
Wow, yeah. East-West University's "Student Life Center" on Wabash was a $35 million project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31595  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2015, 6:19 AM
Ryanrule Ryanrule is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 772
Hardly seems worth the land value.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31596  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2015, 7:29 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
According to Curbed, the Logan Square megamall project was approved by the plan commission (http://chicago.curbed.com/archives/2...ember-2015.php).

Also, for the building at North & Clark. There was concern over this that the Village Theater would be torn down. Here's a render though. MEH:

This is atrociously hideous. I recall after a very early community meeting for this project (perhaps 2 years ago?) I chatted with someone from the development team, who showed their initial concept, which would have been a rather bland, unimaginative, but serviceable modern bluish green glass curtain-wall ordeal with similar overall massing, but early on they were instructed by the powers-that-be to go the "traditional" route architecturally. This rendering suggests something even worse than I could have imagined. This monstrosity makes 65 E Goethe look like a work of timeless taste and attention to historically-respectful detail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31597  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2015, 7:52 PM
PKDickman PKDickman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
This is atrociously hideous. I recall after a very early community meeting for this project (perhaps 2 years ago?) I chatted with someone from the development team, who showed their initial concept, which would have been a rather bland, unimaginative, but serviceable modern bluish green glass curtain-wall ordeal with similar overall massing, but early on they were instructed by the powers-that-be to go the "traditional" route architecturally. This rendering suggests something even worse than I could have imagined. This monstrosity makes 65 E Goethe look like a work of timeless taste and attention to historically-respectful detail.
What does it take?

Here's a building that faced similar issued a hundred years ago.


It is handsome and statuesque, while the Clark & North project looks like a motel on an expressway bypass.

A hundred years ago they understood that if you adorn your building with classically inspired elements, it looks better if they are arranged in classically inspired ratios.

My apologies for gleeping a photo from loopnet. My own image from '06 had a construction canopy in front of it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31598  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2015, 10:41 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,138
On the way to the Botanic Gardens, passed Northshore 770, a senior residences. It's not TOD, unless you count 94. But it's pretty massive and impressive for that part of Skokie/Northbrook. Still under construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31599  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2015, 6:36 PM
george's Avatar
george george is offline
dream fast
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: east village, chicago
Posts: 3,291
12/20

Riverwalk progress east & west of Wells St









__________________
To have ambition was my ambition - Gang of Four
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31600  
Old Posted Dec 24, 2015, 8:07 PM
VKChaz VKChaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California
Posts: 587
Quote:
Originally Posted by PKDickman View Post
What does it take?...

It is handsome and statuesque, while the Clark & North project looks like a motel on an expressway bypass.
What I found interesting was how the initial inquiries evidently drove the decision to pursue larger units and more parking (OK, that is fine, there is a market for that), but evidently also sent the message that buyers did not care what the building looked like - such that the design was weakened from even the original concept. I would have expected people spending this kind of money would demand something better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:46 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.