HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3081  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2014, 4:15 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,830
the 404 has never been planned to go past Sutton, with a 4 lane 48 / 12 combo to disperse the traffic. A ton of traffic turns onto old 48 north of Beaverton (a highway that never should have been downloaded IMO), after which the 4 laning isn't really needed. It especially isn't needed north of 169.

The real "fix" for the 400 IMO is widening the 400 to 3+HOV through the central portion, 4+HOV south of King Road, building the Bradford Bypass, and widening through Barrie to 4+HOV. Maybe extend the 6 lane portion of the 404 to the Bradford Bypass.
     
     
  #3082  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2014, 5:43 PM
middeljohn middeljohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 1,681
Man, forgot how much I hate the 401 through the GTA. At least there's no speed cameras.
     
     
  #3083  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2014, 12:16 AM
thegx thegx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 320

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BxRX679IMAEhcTe.jpg

The final link in Edmonton's ring road coming along nicely.
     
     
  #3084  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2014, 4:56 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,900
Are they ever going to bring HWY#2 up to freeway standards?
     
     
  #3085  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2014, 4:54 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is online now
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
Are they ever going to bring HWY#2 up to freeway standards?
If you mean within the city of Edmonton I doubt it. I think once the ring road is complete the thought is a freeway through the city is not required.
Maybe they will bring it up to freeway standards as far north as Whitemud but I don't know. I believe making Yellowhead free flow is a higher priority for the city.
     
     
  #3086  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2014, 4:31 AM
middeljohn middeljohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 1,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
If you mean within the city of Edmonton I doubt it. I think once the ring road is complete the thought is a freeway through the city is not required.
Maybe they will bring it up to freeway standards as far north as Whitemud but I don't know. I believe making Yellowhead free flow is a higher priority for the city.
Kind of bothersome that there isn't a north-south freeway in the city, but at the same time I have a tough time thinking of a single road in Edmonton that could somewhat easily be converted to a freeway through the entire length of the city. Only one that could sort of be done is 97 St, however only the portion north of downtown. As it is currently is really not that slow. Having just spent the last few days in Toronto I got a good reminder of what bad traffic actually is like.
     
     
  #3087  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2014, 2:54 AM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is online now
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,450
Canada's largest interchange is about to get a little larger.

2 new connecting ramps going in at the 401-403-410 interchange in Mississauga.
-EB 401 to SB 403
-NB 410 to WB 401

http://news.ontario.ca/mto/en/2014/09/improvements-begin-on-highway-410.html

__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
     
     
  #3088  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2014, 4:14 AM
Spocket's Avatar
Spocket Spocket is offline
Back from the dead
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,609
^Actually, I've always wondered why that interchange wasn't built with those ramps in the first place. Was the traffic count estimated to be too low at the time or something ?
__________________
Giving you a reason to drink and drive since 1975.
     
     
  #3089  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2014, 5:31 AM
middeljohn middeljohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 1,681
About time, no idea why they didn't build it in the first place.
     
     
  #3090  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2014, 5:51 AM
BradFromTO's Avatar
BradFromTO BradFromTO is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 992
Quote:
Originally Posted by middeljohn View Post
Man, forgot how much I hate the 401 through the GTA. At least there's no speed cameras.
The section between the 427 and dixon/martin grove is hell on earth. Doesn't matter what time of day it is, there is a very good chance you will be in start and stop traffic
     
     
  #3091  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2014, 6:01 AM
middeljohn middeljohn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 1,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradFromTO View Post
The section between the 427 and dixon/martin grove is hell on earth. Doesn't matter what time of day it is, there is a very good chance you will be in start and stop traffic
Toronto's the only city I've been to that you need to plan for a traffic jam at 1pm. Worst part imo is where the DVP/404 crosses the 401. It's taken me half an hour or more to get across sometimes, a stretch of maybe 500 meters. 10 lanes from the 404 converge into 4 lanes, and then back to 6 on the otherside of the 401.

A few years ago when they completed the QEW widening it was pretty smooth flowing, but now it's back to old habits, although only during peak times.
     
     
  #3092  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2014, 6:04 AM
BradFromTO's Avatar
BradFromTO BradFromTO is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 992
Quote:
Originally Posted by middeljohn View Post
Toronto's the only city I've been to that you need to plan for a traffic jam at 1pm. Worst part imo is where the DVP/404 crosses the 401. It's taken me half an hour or more to get across sometimes, a stretch of maybe 500 meters.

A few years ago when they completed the QEW widening it was pretty smooth flowing, but now it's back to old habits, although only during peak times.
Yeah, the good thing about the QEW and even the Gardiner going through downtown, is that it is generally predictable and you can plan around traffic fairly effectively. The 401 on the other hand...
     
     
  #3093  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2014, 12:49 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by middeljohn View Post
Toronto's the only city I've been to that you need to plan for a traffic jam at 1pm. Worst part imo is where the DVP/404 crosses the 401. It's taken me half an hour or more to get across sometimes, a stretch of maybe 500 meters. 10 lanes from the 404 converge into 4 lanes, and then back to 6 on the otherside of the 401.

A few years ago when they completed the QEW widening it was pretty smooth flowing, but now it's back to old habits, although only during peak times.
Whenever I drive towards Downtown on the DVP, I always come in from the 401. From the westbound 401, particularly from the collector lanes, by-passes most of the congestion that is experienced on the southbound 404. Ideally, they need to get rid of the southbound to eastbound loop ramp from the 404 to the 401, and replace it with something with a higher capacity, but I don't see an easy solution there.
     
     
  #3094  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2014, 12:51 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
the 404 has never been planned to go past Sutton, with a 4 lane 48 / 12 combo to disperse the traffic. A ton of traffic turns onto old 48 north of Beaverton (a highway that never should have been downloaded IMO), after which the 4 laning isn't really needed. It especially isn't needed north of 169.

The real "fix" for the 400 IMO is widening the 400 to 3+HOV through the central portion, 4+HOV south of King Road, building the Bradford Bypass, and widening through Barrie to 4+HOV. Maybe extend the 6 lane portion of the 404 to the Bradford Bypass.
I don't think either the eastern leg of 48 or Hwy 169 should have been downloaded. 169 in particular, while it isn't super busy, is certainly strategic. Enough so, that the province should be regulating roadside development.
     
     
  #3095  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2014, 1:54 PM
Horus's Avatar
Horus Horus is offline
I ask because I Gatineau
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Aylmer (by way of GTA)
Posts: 1,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradFromTO View Post
The section between the 427 and dixon/martin grove is hell on earth. Doesn't matter what time of day it is, there is a very good chance you will be in start and stop traffic
Used to be, you could bypass that mess (eastbound at least) by taking the 427 north to 409 and rejoining the 401 at Islington. That would also get you past the worst of the rush hour traffic on the 401 passing by Pearson as well. I'm not sure if that is still an effective option.
     
     
  #3096  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2014, 2:35 PM
eternallyme eternallyme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horus View Post
Used to be, you could bypass that mess (eastbound at least) by taking the 427 north to 409 and rejoining the 401 at Islington. That would also get you past the worst of the rush hour traffic on the 401 passing by Pearson as well. I'm not sure if that is still an effective option.
The section of the 401 in that area narrows to 8-10 lanes from 14-18 lanes, and there is no room to expand unless either major expropriation takes place, or the express lanes are stacked above the existing highway (both very expensive propositions).
     
     
  #3097  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2014, 5:25 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Pass me the Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 51,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey View Post
Canada's largest interchange is about to get a little larger.

2 new connecting ramps going in at the 401-403-410 interchange in Mississauga.
-EB 401 to SB 403
-NB 410 to WB 401

http://news.ontario.ca/mto/en/2014/09/improvements-begin-on-highway-410.html


The Hershey Highway! Where you drive and shart your pants simultaneously.

re: Hershey sportzone in lower part of map.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
     
     
  #3098  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2014, 9:03 PM
CanadianCentaur's Avatar
CanadianCentaur CanadianCentaur is offline
Briareos Hecatonchires
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Big E
Posts: 3,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
If you mean within the city of Edmonton I doubt it. I think once the ring road is complete the thought is a freeway through the city is not required.
Maybe they will bring it up to freeway standards as far north as Whitemud but I don't know. I believe making Yellowhead free flow is a higher priority for the city.
I think there are probably plans to eventually build an interchange at 34 Avenue (between Whitemud and 23rd Ave), but you're right that it's not a priority compared to the Yellowhead.
__________________
Edmonton/Amiskwacîwâskahikan Lat. 53° 34'N Elevation 671 m (2201 ft) Pop. 1,010,899 (2021 city) 1,418,118 (2021 metro) - North America's northernmost metro area over one million.
     
     
  #3099  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2014, 4:25 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,900
You think that's bad, try Vancouver.

The Massey Tunnel northbound in rush hour has 5 lanes merging into just 1!

Also, when I was referring to HWY#2 in Alberta, I didn't mean Edmonton but the entire stretch from Airdrie to Leduc. It still has some level crossings doesn't it? I know most maps don't show it as a complete freeway but rather mostly freeway and the other sections shown as just a 4 lane road.

Is that the case still or have they brought the entire road up to freeway standards?
     
     
  #3100  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2014, 4:48 AM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey View Post
Canada's largest interchange is about to get a little larger.

2 new connecting ramps going in at the 401-403-410 interchange in Mississauga.
-EB 401 to SB 403
-NB 410 to WB 401

http://news.ontario.ca/mto/en/2014/09/improvements-begin-on-highway-410.html

Nice interchange. Shame they're going to ruin it with a loop. It should be all flyovers
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:19 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.