Quote:
Originally Posted by Caliplanner1
That's the big difference in the thinking of Americans vis-a-vis the thinking of Canadians. Private or public developers here in the U.S. generally tend to project optimal efficiency/profitability when planning major communications infrastructure. Thus, (for example) here in Los Angeles post World War II roads (whether built publicly or privately) are generally very wide because there is an acute awareness that travel/transportation time, is money cost, and traffic congestion due to inadequately scaled roads adversely impacts both (re: time and money)!
|
Even on this right-leaning pro-business site we still get a lot of people saying bridges/highways are too wide. I don't understand it either, unless they have an anti-car attitude in general and want to make driving as miserable as possible. I do agree with the "wide roads increase sprawl and then become clogged" argument generally, but not for Vancouver where maximum sprawl is physically limited.
America screwed up big time by letting Ford and Co. destroy public transit but there's no reason why we can't have adequate infrastructure for all modes of transportation.