HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2981  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 12:15 AM
Mr Tall Forehead's Avatar
Mr Tall Forehead Mr Tall Forehead is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2024
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 856
An East-West pipeline, electricity transmission line and limited access highway sound pretty nation building to me.

It would take a decade plus and cost billions but it would connect the country and drive the economy during construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2982  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 1:48 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,272
I'm hearing the twinning in Whitehsell is close to 1 billion dollars with the northern route option and interchanges, etc. It is part of the national highway network. In reality, the TCH portion in Ontario is the weak link as it's a very long stretch on single lane highway. But in MB, it completes that piece of the twinned highway network.

In larger nation building stuff. Twinning highway 6 to Churchill, mega project. Upgrades to Port of Churchill and new Port Nelson, mega nation building. Have both ports serve different markets and allow higher level of military support. New hydro plants on the Nelson, mega. Railways, mega. All that stuff provides Manitoba and the nation the capabilities to grow economically, socially, militarily. That's what nation building is.

In terms of urban realm stuff in Winnipeg. Mass transit. In all cases, support private sector with incentives.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2983  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 1:57 PM
TimeFadesAway TimeFadesAway is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 775
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
I'm hearing the twinning in Whitehsell is close to 1 billion dollars with the northern route option and interchanges, etc. It is part of the national highway network. In reality, the TCH portion in Ontario is the weak link as it's a very long stretch on single lane highway. But in MB, it completes that piece of the twinned highway network.
The 6ish kilometres completed so far in Ontario cost $36 million, so for roughly 2.5 times the distance in Manitoba, it's 27 times the cost.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2984  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 2:03 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,272
Ya I dont get it. It's a new corridor with interchanges. So that'll be the big hit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2985  
Old Posted May 10, 2025, 7:42 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,398
$1B for 17kms of highway?? - that’s utterly ridiculous.
The Kicking Horse Canyon section through the mountains in BC wasn’t even close to that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2986  
Old Posted May 11, 2025, 5:07 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
$1B for 17kms of highway?? - that’s utterly ridiculous.
The Kicking Horse Canyon section through the mountains in BC wasn’t even close to that.
lazzy accounting allows for insane price gouging i dunno what we do in this province but its bad dealing with this up north and seeing this in studies on infrastructure throwing numbers that make no sens
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2987  
Old Posted May 11, 2025, 6:11 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 2,335
Might be one of the benefits of blowing up trade barriers, other provinces' companies can bid.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2988  
Old Posted May 11, 2025, 6:27 PM
plrh plrh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 944
Quote:
Originally Posted by FactaNV View Post
Might be one of the benefits of blowing up trade barriers, other provinces' companies can bid.
They already do. Miller from Ontario did half of Centreport Way and Aecon, also from Ontario, did the St Mary's overpass. Oh and Flatiron from Alberta did the 59 and 101 overpass. However, they do subcontract most of the work to locals and just manage the job.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2989  
Old Posted May 12, 2025, 8:14 AM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,272
This is what I heard. But it's second hand info from someone else who also heard this. Maybe if we finally heard straight from the province we'd get first hand info.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2990  
Old Posted May 21, 2025, 4:36 AM
Carboy15's Avatar
Carboy15 Carboy15 is offline
CanAutoroute1
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Centerville of Canada
Posts: 595
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2991  
Old Posted May 21, 2025, 2:25 PM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,811
Quote:
Originally Posted by plrh View Post
They already do. Miller from Ontario did half of Centreport Way and Aecon, also from Ontario, did the St Mary's overpass. Oh and Flatiron from Alberta did the 59 and 101 overpass. However, they do subcontract most of the work to locals and just manage the job.
Didn't the out of province contractors Flatiron and SNC Lavalin Constructors Pacific both loose money on their respective interchange contracts? I vaguely remember something about geotech issues on both sites causing overruns.

It was to do the the Manitoba Gumbo being used in the bridge approach ramps doing things they were all not use to when it gets wet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2992  
Old Posted May 21, 2025, 4:10 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,272
Both projects used granular fill, wick drains, etc for the bridges in an effort to control the approach embankments. It's just bad workmanship IMO. Specifically at 59/101 and the settlement.

Noted difference between the two projects is that Centreport uses MSE approach embankments and an approach slab to connect to the bridge. This minimizes the bump at the bridge. 59 did not and that obviously had issues. Centreport I think more of the issue were in general due to the lack of understanding of the Geotechnical requirements for the clay in general.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2993  
Old Posted May 21, 2025, 4:15 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,272
At st Mary's, they used granular fill and cellular concrete for the bridge approaches, as well as approach slabs. Basically not much more you can do. Difference here is that the bridge is on the minor road. No need to worry about it for the high speed route.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2994  
Old Posted May 22, 2025, 6:23 PM
Carboy15's Avatar
Carboy15 Carboy15 is offline
CanAutoroute1
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Centerville of Canada
Posts: 595
https://www.ctvnews.ca/winnipeg/video/20...ng-against-proposed-highway-improvement/

https://www.ctvnews.ca/winnipeg/article/...roposal-getting-pushback-from-residents/

Hmmm. People are opposing the RCUT design. I understand that the RCUT would take a little bit longer to navigate, but it's better than nothing.

But I doubt that a roundabout would work any better than an RCUT.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2995  
Old Posted May 22, 2025, 6:27 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,272
Good.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2996  
Old Posted May 22, 2025, 6:53 PM
Wpgstvsouth94 Wpgstvsouth94 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carboy15 View Post
https://www.ctvnews.ca/winnipeg/video/20...ng-against-proposed-highway-improvement/

https://www.ctvnews.ca/winnipeg/article/...roposal-getting-pushback-from-residents/

Hmmm. People are opposing the RCUT design. I understand that the RCUT would take a little bit longer to navigate, but it's better than nothing.

But I doubt that a roundabout would work any better than an RCUT.


Good what the province is proposing is an absolute disgrace and mockery to the families who lost loved ones in that tragedy. The provincial and federal government should be coming to the table with funding for the interchange at this location.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2997  
Old Posted May 23, 2025, 1:47 AM
Carboy15's Avatar
Carboy15 Carboy15 is offline
CanAutoroute1
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Centerville of Canada
Posts: 595
https://stroadz.glide.page/dl/d0a5f4/s/c0a8e8/r/UNdcl0k9XoAqdAVcJiat

Just build an Interchange already. It's a simple diamond Interchange, that's all. WallyWhinerOfficial hates that we tend to opt for band-aid solutions rather than a long-term fix.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2998  
Old Posted May 27, 2025, 2:04 PM
KnickKnack KnickKnack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 108
This being Manitoba we would somehow end up spending $300 million on a simple diamond interchange in a rural area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2999  
Old Posted May 27, 2025, 4:16 PM
bodaggin bodaggin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 772
Something's happening.

Monitor Stroadz.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3000  
Old Posted May 27, 2025, 6:11 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,479
Quote:
Originally Posted by bodaggin View Post
Something's happening.

Monitor Stroadz.
Federal dollars for TCH intersection improvements?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:58 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.