HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #281  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2024, 9:24 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,163
I don't mind the look of the tower. The look is a product of the development parcel. 35 times lot coverage at only 52 storey is an ugly lot coverage for a skyscraper and inhibits the architect to an I don't mind the look tower. And affordable just means tiny. 630 units in 35,000 square metres. Overall, another response to the bubbly market today and a terrible precedence for the long term future of Toronto.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #282  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2024, 9:30 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,163
I don't mind the look refers to the rendering. I don't have a lot of hope that it won't be back painted glass spandreled with the players involved
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #283  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2024, 9:40 PM
hipster duck's Avatar
hipster duck hipster duck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Overall, another response to the bubbly market today and a terrible precedence for the long term future of Toronto.
Yeah, projects like this will just lower the desirability of...*checks notes*...Dundas and Sherbourne.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #284  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2024, 9:46 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 67,103
Two 22-Storey Towers Planned For First Phase Of Edmonton Mill Woods Town Centre

The City of Edmonton is currently taking public comment on the proposal for the first phase of the Mill Woods Town Centre redevelopment.

Howard Chai
February 09, 2024


https://storeys.com/edmonton-mill-wo...ent-phase-one/
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #285  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2024, 10:02 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck View Post
Yeah, projects like this will just lower the desirability of...*checks notes*...Dundas and Sherbourne.
It's not going to improve it. Please correct me that the 400ish square foot bowling alley hotel suite layout apartments within arms reach of another building with bowling alley hotel suite layout apartments are considered desirable to the tens of thousand occupying them.

Okay then. Dundas and Sherbourne is a shithole. The towers built and rising at Redpath and Broadway aren't ugly or cheap looking by Toronto standards. The environment created by the collective is oppressive to say the least. I'll speculate that the average unit layout will be narrow and cramped too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #286  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2024, 10:46 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
I don't mind the look of the tower. The look is a product of the development parcel. 35 times lot coverage at only 52 storey is an ugly lot coverage for a skyscraper and inhibits the architect to an I don't mind the look tower. And affordable just means tiny. 630 units in 35,000 square metres. Overall, another response to the bubbly market today and a terrible precedence for the long term future of Toronto.
Pure greed. Why would the skyline step up going east from Jarvis? To create the most jarring-as-possible transition to low-rise neighbourhoods apparently...

If it weren't for the St Mikes flight paths, the whole area southeast of Ryerson would be a sun-less maze of canyons a-la King/Peter
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #287  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2024, 11:12 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,163
It's happening anyways regardless of reduced heights for the flight path

Intensification started off so well on King East around Sherbourne with MoZo and East Lofts and then the hulking Globe and Mail tower got built. Since, then it's block busting, retained facades on enormous podiums topped with 30 storey towers. It's a tragic end to a neighbourhood with lots of holes to fill but so much more potential to add to the existing fabric over the demolition and/or recreating it as facades attached to podiums under skyscrapers. How many individual properties were consolidated for ROC City and Grainger and Sanderson? Then there is Metrolinx and Infrastructure Ontario's intervention with as many housing units around the new Ontario Line station as possible irrespective of anything else.

Mozo and East Lofts have building heights reflective of their time. In no way should their example be interpreted as limiting height to those buildings. There's room for a slim Spire or Theatre Park both providing open space

Last edited by WhipperSnapper; Feb 13, 2024 at 11:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #288  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 12:01 AM
yaletown_fella yaletown_fella is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,339
243-247 Davenport Road

16 Story condo with retail proposal.

DC Dev Corp & Richard Wengle Architects

South side of Davenport , just west of Avenue Rd.



__________________
Supporter of Bill 23
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #289  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 1:36 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,163
The recently completed One Forest Hill by Wengle is a confusing mess of ideas. This one is too simple given the inelegant massing although it looks like two different midrises stacked on one another. Drop the podium and build a modified upper portion. An added bonus is 6 fewer floors would be a more appropriate scale.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #290  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 4:07 AM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by yaletown_fella View Post
243-247 Davenport Road

16 Story condo with retail proposal.

DC Dev Corp & Richard Wengle Architects

South side of Davenport , just west of Avenue Rd.


I like the profile of this one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #291  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 4:37 AM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 9,328
The Davenport Road one looks decent to me. The only thing that I don't care for is that the facade is overly dominated by uniform window grid, and perhaps overly large windows for the style. The profile and silhouette seem to be trying to evoke Neo-Classical, Deco, and Art Moderne forms but those styles aren't so heavily dominated by window. There needs to be more of a focal element to break up all the window. For instance, the central stripe of darker frames should be more than just darker frames. It should be either protruding bay windows or ornate balconies with that line carrying up to some sort of crown element. One St Thomas, while not perfect, does a good job of reinterpreting a legacy style without it being overly compromised by contemporary demands for unimpeded views.

A facade consisting almost entirely of a uniform grid of square windows works well with modernist styles but for me, modernism doesn't work well with that silhouette. It dabbles in tacky pomo territory. But this is far from the worst offender so I can't complain to much. Just a minor note.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #292  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 3:01 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,848
Pretty soon Toronto will have to start importing in 1800's to early 1900's era house facades to place on all of their new tower podiums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maldive View Post
239 Dundas East | 163.6m | 52s | Metropia | Turner Fleischer l pre-construction

__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #293  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 6:39 PM
thomax's Avatar
thomax thomax is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,380
New rendering of Hamilton's 310 Frances Ave


source


source
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #294  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 7:07 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 9,328
^ I like the design of the towers which looks very sleek with the vertical lines.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #295  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 8:05 PM
Maldive's Avatar
Maldive Maldive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,500
Royal Ontario Museum - OpenROM Project | Siamak Hariri

Fueled by by a $50-million donation from the Hennick Family Foundation (the largest cash gift in ROM’s history), OpenROM includes an architectural transformation of the Museum’s main floor and a redesigned Bloor Street entrance. Highlights include large founatains wrapping around the heritage ROM building, an expansive bronze canopy sheltering the Bloor Street entrance and four-storey atrium capped with a sweeping, high-performance diagrid glass ceiling. Total budget for the reno is $130million.

“OpenROM’s expansive architectural design, coupled with year-round free admission to the Museum’s entire main floor, as well as unlimited access to special programming, live performances, and hands-on activities, will make ROM an even greater cultural anchor and gathering place”. 



UT

UT

UT

UT

UT

Fly through link: https://youtu.be/_bcs_LlfhpI
__________________
circa 2008: home of the 3rd best skyline in N.A. +++ circa 2028: home of the 2nd best skyline in N.A. (T-Dot)

Last edited by Maldive; Feb 14, 2024 at 9:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #296  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 8:17 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,826
This was a very unexpected surprise. How rich is that family to just gift 50 million?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #297  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 8:23 PM
rbt rbt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,378
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoDrew View Post
This was a very unexpected surprise. How rich is that family to just gift 50 million?
Somewhere around 2 billion according to Forbes.

https://www.forbes.com/profile/jay-h...h=4da057c6c9d4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #298  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 9:17 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,163
This canupy compromises the integrity of the Liebeskind crystal. I hate stairs too.

This is an opportunity to spread the wealth to small museums that large donors ignore or buy, renovate, build an off site annex instead of constantly reinventing award worthy architectural design. I guess the dude's foundation wants the family name on another big name institution
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #299  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 10:09 PM
Maldive's Avatar
Maldive Maldive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
This canupy compromises the integrity of the Liebeskind crystal.
The huge swath of transparent glass along Bloor, which exposes some the wacky structural steel required to build the thing, is great imo.

The little mall entrance that's presently there doesn't exactly scream "yay... we're here!".


UT

As for the stairs, there's a ramp plenty big enough for you to use.
__________________
circa 2008: home of the 3rd best skyline in N.A. +++ circa 2028: home of the 2nd best skyline in N.A. (T-Dot)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #300  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2024, 10:33 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,163
Sometimes SSP just makes me want to throw my phone against the wall. I purposely said canopy or was it my spelling error that threw you off to start talking about the glazing. Its a swath of ground floor glazing that UTers complain about constantly. More glass is welcoming. This is just boring and unsympathetic to the star architecture Crystal hence the in vain attempt at the canopy as a buffer. The ROM went and hired an architect at the very peak of stardom. You don't have to be a Liebeskind fan or a Crystal fan to say that this is getting ridiculous like another Batman origin movie.


I don't like stairs out in the elements. They should be avoided whenever possible. These do absolute nothing to accentuate the architecture unlike classical design with columns, plinths and steps.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:52 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.