HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2961  
Old Posted Feb 29, 2016, 6:17 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,891
Quote:
Originally Posted by emathias View Post
There is a commercial low-rise proposal for it. There is also a (probably stagnant) proposal for the SW corner of Illinois and Lasalle.
I think Hubbard and LaSalle is the site of a former commercial low rise proposal that recently got changed to about 11 stories.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2962  
Old Posted Feb 29, 2016, 6:17 PM
maru2501's Avatar
maru2501 maru2501 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,668
^^yeah that's different from the original one I recall

anyway, the lot was cleared of cars today with a DIRTT vehicle on street at site (unclear if related)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2963  
Old Posted Feb 29, 2016, 6:26 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,431
^ Highly unlikely as DIRTT is a company that makes cubicles and other furnishings for commercial interiors...
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2964  
Old Posted Feb 29, 2016, 7:14 PM
chris11 chris11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 73
Updated. Continue adding to the proposals I'm missing or feel free to use the picture for you more skilled photoshoppers

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2965  
Old Posted Feb 29, 2016, 7:31 PM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
^ Highly unlikely as DIRTT is a company that makes cubicles and other furnishings for commercial interiors...
Maybe someday DIRTT will get into plug and play office buildings
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2966  
Old Posted Feb 29, 2016, 7:51 PM
maru2501's Avatar
maru2501 maru2501 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,668
well they should change their name to CHAIRR
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2967  
Old Posted Feb 29, 2016, 9:28 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,556
Sinclair (TOJ)

So in a post last week on chicagoarchitecture.org, it was reported that the overall FAR for The Sinclair/new Jewel was just 6.7........is this right?! If so, that's crazy.....anything less than a 10-12 for this particular overall parcel should be considered criminal......
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2968  
Old Posted Feb 29, 2016, 10:10 PM
J_M_Tungsten's Avatar
J_M_Tungsten J_M_Tungsten is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,379
^not sure about that, but there will be 2 Tower cranes for this one.
Now
The Sinclair/New Jewel

Last edited by J_M_Tungsten; Feb 29, 2016 at 10:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2969  
Old Posted Feb 29, 2016, 10:14 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
So in a post last week on chicagoarchitecture.org, it was reported that the overall FAR for The Sinclair/new Jewel was just 6.7........is this right?! If so, that's crazy.....anything less than a 10-12 for this particular overall parcel should be considered criminal......
Originally the developers were proposing a nearly 50 story building for that site.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2970  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 1:06 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,443
800 South Michigan
Essex Tower

585'
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2971  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 1:29 AM
BuildThemTaller BuildThemTaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Island City, NY
Posts: 1,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
800 South Michigan
Essex Tower

585'
Updated rendering, courtesy of Chicago Architecture Blog



EDIT: Second image of revised "stilts," which is being described as indoor/outdoor winter garden:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2972  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 1:53 AM
mattshoe mattshoe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 80
^Disappointing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2973  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 1:56 AM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Monterey CA
Posts: 4,252
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattshoe View Post
^Disappointing
Hardly.

Besides, the renderings are not even that clear.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2974  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 2:05 AM
BuildThemTaller BuildThemTaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Island City, NY
Posts: 1,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
Hardly.

Besides, the renderings are not even that clear.
I agree. The stilts haven't been removed from the design and remain prominent. I also like the diamond pattern. This could be a distinctive tower for Chicago, and great addition to the skyline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2975  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 2:11 AM
J_M_Tungsten's Avatar
J_M_Tungsten J_M_Tungsten is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,379
Great addition to the skyline and Michigan Ave. That is going to add an awesome visual effect to the historic street wall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2976  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 2:40 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,613
Better by far.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2977  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 2:45 AM
Kumdogmillionaire's Avatar
Kumdogmillionaire Kumdogmillionaire is offline
Development Shill
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattshoe View Post
^Disappointing
Yes, the picture quality is disappointing, other than that you can't draw any conclusions...
__________________
For you - Bane
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2978  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 2:52 AM
PKDickman PKDickman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
So in a post last week on chicagoarchitecture.org, it was reported that the overall FAR for The Sinclair/new Jewel was just 6.7........is this right?! If so, that's crazy.....anything less than a 10-12 for this particular overall parcel should be considered criminal......
That's right. But they're still building a 35 story tower. The bulk of subarea C1 will be the Jewel which is actually less than 1 FAR with 3 floors of parking.

The over all FAR for the entire PD is 3.25. but it is frickin enormous.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2979  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 4:49 AM
streetline streetline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 251
The winter garden is certainly less daring, but it is a bit more useful year round...
It makes me wonder just how difficult and expensive it would be to make the multi-story glass walls of the winter garden operable (perhaps sliding up, or back along the sides, in pleasant weather).

Also, I notice the lower floors, which used to show cars in previous renderings, now show people.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2980  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 4:50 AM
VKChaz VKChaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California
Posts: 584
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
I'm not sure. The developer deleted the roof over parking last summer, and replaced the garden wall along Milwaukee with a long narrow retail space/"retail bar".

Deviation from the approved plan would require a PD amendment/minor change from the Zoning Administrator, not just a revised permit.

It's possible this is just for construction staging purposes, with the retail "bar" to be built at a later date after the towers are more complete. Trucks and equipment can't get into the site from Milwaukee after the retail bar is built, they would have to go down Belden or Washtenaw which is probably a no-no with the neighbors. Also the rooftop terrace on top of the retailbar is a big amenity to help lease the building, I can't believe Buono would just get rid of it entirely.
fyi:
brief update via Curbed

http://chicago.curbed.com/2016/2/29/...-square-towers
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:16 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.